Playboy Awarded $19M in Legal Battle Against Former Brand Licensees

Playboy Awarded $19M in Legal Battle Against Former Brand Licensees

CHICAGO — A Chicago judge on Friday sided with Playboy Enterprises Inc. and tripled a jury award against a pair of former licensees, Play Beverages LLC and CirTran Beverage Corp., that were alleged to have infringed on its trademark.

Last October, a jury unanimously found that the beverage companies intentionally sold Playboy Energy Drinks under Playboy's trademarks knowing that they were counterfeit. The jury awarded Playboy $5 million in damages for infringement, along with $1.6 million in a breach-of-contract claim.

Friday’s tripling of the jury’s award means that Play Beverages and CirTran are on the hook for $15 million in damages. The judge also awarded to Playboy attorneys' fees and costs of suit.  

The enforceable judgment as modified by the court now totals about $19 million, Playboy’s trial counsel said.

The court earlier issued a permanent injunction against the beverage companies and persons associated with them, including their principal, Iehab Hawatmeh, along with their agents and distributors.

The injunction ordered them to immediately stop manufacturing, selling, promoting and advertising Playboy Energy Drinks, as well as any other Playboy products or services.

The legal feud between the companies that were once business partners has been going on for more than five years and has worked its way through bankruptcy court, federal district courts in California and Illinois and the Chicago-area county court.

After several of CirTran’s creditors began an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding against the company in 2011, Playboy told CirTran it was terminating the licensing deal over missed royalty payments.

CirTran’s distributor Play Beverages, in response, filed claims accusing Playboy of interfering with its sales and distribution of the drinks.

The parties agreed to drop litigation to try to negotiate themselves but, in the meantime, the original deal expired and Play Beverages was unable to raise $2 million to keep its business alive.

Later, CirTran and Play Beverages sued Playboy, reasserting breach of contract allegations and claiming the company told them they intended to extend CirTran’s five-year licensing deal and encouraged them to sign contracts with distributors to sell the drink.

CirTran then claimed that Playboy actually had no intention of re-entering into the licensing deal because it was negotiating with other suitors.

Playboy moved its claims on to another venue, federal court in California, asking a judge to enter a preliminary injunction barring the company from selling the products after the license’s expiration.

After the federal court dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction, Playboy refiled its case in Illinois federal court, where a judge there said the dispute should be resolved in state court, where CirTran’s suit was still pending.

Playboy then brought several counterclaims, alleging it was CirTran that breached the contract and accusing the company of infringing on Playboy’s trademark.

In a statement today, Playboy officials said that they plan to collect on the judgment in the long-running case.

“Playboy will continue to strongly enforce its judgment and injunction against Play Beverages/CirTran Beverage to stop Iehab Hawatmeh's companies from engaging in infringing and counterfeiting activities,” Playboy said. “In addition, Playboy will continue to defend its trademarks vigorously throughout the world as Playboy has done in this case.”

Related:  

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Nebraska Legislature Passes Republican's Age Verification Bill With No Votes Against It

Nebraska’s unicameral legislature has passed the state’s version of the age verification bills being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists.

Performers in Meta Blacklisting Lawsuit Seek to Preserve Antitrust Claims

Adult Performance Artists Guild board officers Alana Evans, Kelly Pierce and Ruby have informed a California court that, although they want to drop their lawsuit claiming that Meta conspired with OnlyFans to blacklist rival premium fan platforms’ talent, they may still have antitrust claims that they may pursue in the future.

Xgen Now Shipping ZOLO's 'Stroke Off' Collection

Xgen Products is now shipping the Stroke Off collection of 11 handheld strokers and four masturbators modeled after lifelike body parts.

Nobü Unveils 'Gyrä' Vibrating Grinding Pad

Nobü has introduced the new Gyrä vibrating grinding pad.

Orion Introduces New 3-Motor Vibrator From 'Sweet Smile' Line

Orion Wholesale has debuted the new three-motor RC G- & P-Spot Vibrator from its Sweet Smile line.

C1R Debuts 'Vers' Suction Dildo, Butt Plug

C1R has introduced its new Vers liquid silicone suction dildo and butt plug.

FSC, Co-Plaintiffs to Ask US Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Texas Age Verification Law

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) and its co-plaintiffs in the challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law have filed a petition before the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit asking to stay its recent upholding the law because they intend to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the law’s constitutionality.

Blush Erotica, The Kinky Candle Company Partner for Branded Candle

Blush Erotica has partnered with The Kinky Candle Company for an official branded candle.

FSC Vows to Fight Florida Age Verification Law

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) issued a statement vowing to continue fighting Florida’s age verification law, which was signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday as part of a comprehensive bill targeting minors’ use of social media.

Kansas Republican Aims to Create New Bureaucracy to 'Investigate' Porn Websites

Republican state legislators succeeded Monday in moving forward Kansas’ version of the age verification bills being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists, despite serious concerns raised by House Democrats about the cost of establishing a new bureaucracy tasked with investigating websites for pornographic content.

Show More