6 Credit Card Networks Sued Over 'Bad Lists'

6 Credit Card Networks Sued Over 'Bad Lists'

SAN FRANCISCO — Half a dozen credit card networks discriminate in keeping “bad lists” that prohibit the selling of adult-oriented materials, psychic services and paraphernalia such as bongs and hookahs, according to a class-action suit filed on Thursday.

The class suit, filed by convenience store operator Abu Maisa, alleges that Google, Intuit, Square, Stripe, Flint Mobile and PayPal each incorporate a “bad list” that sets boundaries of what the operator can and can’t sell.

Abu Maisa claims in the suit, filed at San Francisco federal court, that it has been so handcuffed on the types of products it sells, it can’t even offer Penthouse magazine on its shelves for fear of risk that its accounts would be shut.

Attorney William McGrane of McGrane LLP, who filed the case on behalf of Abu Maisa, told XBIZ that the claim aims at the civil rights violations of business categories that are being arbitrarily being discriminated against because of their lawful occupation.

The suit, which includes exhibits of each of the six credit card companies’ “bad lists,” involves “attempts by many large credit card processing companies … to infringe free speech by outlawing those who are engaged in [legal businesses],” McGrane said.

“[E]ach and every other category of ‘bad lists’ are either so vaguely described as to be unintelligible or else constitute an entirely lawful business/business activity under any and all applicable federal and state laws,” the suit said, noting that the practice is contrary to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act.

Under the Unruh Civil Rights Act, all persons are entitled to full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments, including both private and public entities.

McGrane estimates that the six credit card companies could be on the hook for $1 billion in minimum statutory liability in the Abu Maisa claim, which seeks other class members, including those who similarly sell adult-oriented products and have been faced with the companies’ “bad lists.”

If the case is certified for class action, plaintiffs could be entitled to recover minimum statutory damages of $4,000.

View lawsuit

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Tenga Marks 20th Anniversary With New 'Flip 360' Strokers

Pleasure brand Tenga is celebrating its 20th anniversary with the debut of its new Flip 360 stroker sleeves.

Wellness Brand 'Aia*' Launches

The wellness brand Aia* has officially launched.

Orion Debuts 5 New Styles From 'Cottelli Party' Line

Orion Wholesale has expanded its Cottelli Party line with five new styles.

OnlyFans Institutes Criminal Background Checks for US Creators

OnlyFans will screen creators in the United States for criminal convictions, CEO Keily Blair has announced in a post on LinkedIn.

Pineapple Support to Host 'Healthier Relationships' Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group on enhancing connection and personal growth.

Honey Play Box, Dildos Assorted Ink European Distro Deal

Honey Play Box has signed a deal with Dildos Assorted (DA) for distribution throughout Southern Europe.

Calvista, Lovense Sign Exclusive Australia/New Zealand Distro Deal for 'Spinel'

Calvista has signed an exclusive Australian and New Zealand distribution deal for Lovense's Spinel thrusting and heating dildo.

Blush Introduces 'Riana' Vibe

Blush has debuted the Riana vibrator.

Lovense Debuts 'Spinel' Mini Sex Machine

Lovense has introduced its new app-controlled Spinel mini sex machine.

Strike 3 Rejects Meta 'Personal Use' Defense in AI Suit

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings this week responded to Facebook parent company Meta’s motion to dismiss Strike 3’s suit accusing Meta of pirating VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Show More