6 Credit Card Networks Sued Over 'Bad Lists'

6 Credit Card Networks Sued Over 'Bad Lists'

SAN FRANCISCO — Half a dozen credit card networks discriminate in keeping “bad lists” that prohibit the selling of adult-oriented materials, psychic services and paraphernalia such as bongs and hookahs, according to a class-action suit filed on Thursday.

The class suit, filed by convenience store operator Abu Maisa, alleges that Google, Intuit, Square, Stripe, Flint Mobile and PayPal each incorporate a “bad list” that sets boundaries of what the operator can and can’t sell.

Abu Maisa claims in the suit, filed at San Francisco federal court, that it has been so handcuffed on the types of products it sells, it can’t even offer Penthouse magazine on its shelves for fear of risk that its accounts would be shut.

Attorney William McGrane of McGrane LLP, who filed the case on behalf of Abu Maisa, told XBIZ that the claim aims at the civil rights violations of business categories that are being arbitrarily being discriminated against because of their lawful occupation.

The suit, which includes exhibits of each of the six credit card companies’ “bad lists,” involves “attempts by many large credit card processing companies … to infringe free speech by outlawing those who are engaged in [legal businesses],” McGrane said.

“[E]ach and every other category of ‘bad lists’ are either so vaguely described as to be unintelligible or else constitute an entirely lawful business/business activity under any and all applicable federal and state laws,” the suit said, noting that the practice is contrary to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act.

Under the Unruh Civil Rights Act, all persons are entitled to full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments, including both private and public entities.

McGrane estimates that the six credit card companies could be on the hook for $1 billion in minimum statutory liability in the Abu Maisa claim, which seeks other class members, including those who similarly sell adult-oriented products and have been faced with the companies’ “bad lists.”

If the case is certified for class action, plaintiffs could be entitled to recover minimum statutory damages of $4,000.

View lawsuit

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Hankey's Toys Releases 'Roxas Caelum' Dildo

The Roxas Caelum dildo from Mr. Hankey's Toys has been unveiled.

FSC: Federal Report Confirms Unfair Banking Discrimination Against Adult Industry

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) today announced that a federal report on debanking has concluded that several U.S. banks engaged in discriminatory banking practices against members of the adult industry.

Ghettoff Founder Nefertiti Mitchell Passes Away

Nefertiti "Neff" Mitchell, founder and CEO of adult retail store Ghettof, has passed away.

Pineapple Support Names Natalie Pereira Executive Assistant

Pineapple Support has appointed Natalie Pereira as its new executive assistant.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches by Country for October, November

AEBN has released the list of popular searches from its straight and gay theaters by country in October and November.

Nobü Adds to 'Essentials' Collection

Nobü is expanding its Essentials collection with three new pleasure products.

FSC Summit Event Schedule Announced

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has revealed its slate of networking events and symposiums for its annual summit, set for January 15 during XBIZ 2026.

Orion Debuts 'Skull Masturbator' From Rebel Line

Orion Wholesale has released the Skull Masturbator from its Rebel collection.

Pornhub Releases 2025 'Year in Review' Report

Pornhub has released its “Year in Review Insights” report for 2025, the 12th edition of the site’s annual statistics, data analysis, and infographic initiative.

Washington AV Bill Jumps on 'Health Warning' Bandwagon

A new age verification bill in the Washington state legislature would require adult sites to post notices warning users of alleged health risks, despite a previous federal court ruling against such requirements.

Show More