6 Credit Card Networks Sued Over 'Bad Lists'

6 Credit Card Networks Sued Over 'Bad Lists'

SAN FRANCISCO — Half a dozen credit card networks discriminate in keeping “bad lists” that prohibit the selling of adult-oriented materials, psychic services and paraphernalia such as bongs and hookahs, according to a class-action suit filed on Thursday.

The class suit, filed by convenience store operator Abu Maisa, alleges that Google, Intuit, Square, Stripe, Flint Mobile and PayPal each incorporate a “bad list” that sets boundaries of what the operator can and can’t sell.

Abu Maisa claims in the suit, filed at San Francisco federal court, that it has been so handcuffed on the types of products it sells, it can’t even offer Penthouse magazine on its shelves for fear of risk that its accounts would be shut.

Attorney William McGrane of McGrane LLP, who filed the case on behalf of Abu Maisa, told XBIZ that the claim aims at the civil rights violations of business categories that are being arbitrarily being discriminated against because of their lawful occupation.

The suit, which includes exhibits of each of the six credit card companies’ “bad lists,” involves “attempts by many large credit card processing companies … to infringe free speech by outlawing those who are engaged in [legal businesses],” McGrane said.

“[E]ach and every other category of ‘bad lists’ are either so vaguely described as to be unintelligible or else constitute an entirely lawful business/business activity under any and all applicable federal and state laws,” the suit said, noting that the practice is contrary to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act.

Under the Unruh Civil Rights Act, all persons are entitled to full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments, including both private and public entities.

McGrane estimates that the six credit card companies could be on the hook for $1 billion in minimum statutory liability in the Abu Maisa claim, which seeks other class members, including those who similarly sell adult-oriented products and have been faced with the companies’ “bad lists.”

If the case is certified for class action, plaintiffs could be entitled to recover minimum statutory damages of $4,000.

View lawsuit

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

SWR Data Publishes 2026 'Hot List' Report

Adult industry market research outfit SWR Data has published its 2026 Hot List report on the top creator platforms of 2025.

Calvista Now Shipping 'Romp' Line From WOW Tech

Calvista has reintroduced WOW Tech’s Romp line of pleasure products to the Australian and New Zealand markets.

OTouch Debuts 'Inscup 4' Stroker

OTouch has introduced its Inscup 4 masturbator.

Full Circle Introduces 2 New Display Planograms

Full Circle has debuted new display planograms for its jewelry line and its bullet vibe collection.

Adult Chat Platform Arousr Sets Human-Only Host Policy

Adult chat platform Arousr has announced a policy to only use verified human hosts, not chatbots.

Creative Conceptions Debuts 'Skins' Non-Latex Condoms

Creative Conceptions has introduced the new Skins line of non-latex condoms.

Arizona State Legislator Proposes Porn Ban

A member of Arizona’s House of Representatives on Wednesday introduced a bill that would make it illegal to produce or distribute adult content in that state.

Rouge Group Taps Sean Macauley for Global Sales Manager

U.K. pleasure brand Rouge Group has appointed Sean Macauley as its new global sales manager.

Male Power Debuts 'Gridlock'd' Collection

Male Power has introduced its new Gridlock’d collection of men's underwear.

B-Vibe, Gigi Engle Partner for 'Kink Starter Kit'

B-Vibe and author Gigi Engle have partnered for the limited-edition Kink Curious Kit.

Show More