Apple Wants Fines, Penalties For Jailbroken iPhones

CUPERTINO, Calif. — Enterprising iPhone users who want to "crack" their device's operating system might face a $2,500 fine if Apple has its way.

Consumer advocacy group the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has petitioned the Library of Congress to protect all mobile phone owners who "crack" their phone's operating systems. In the case of Apple's iPhone, cracking the native OS means that users can install whatever applications they want, including thousands not authorized by Apple.

Apple has fought against such measures since the release of the iPhone by making it difficult and hazardous to crack the iPhone OS and with their latest objection to the EFF's filing.

Apple's objection would hit consumers with a fine of "up to $2,500" if they crack their iPhones, with the additional danger of a potentially five-year criminal penalty if they crack their iPhone for "financial gain." Apple did not specify what that criminal penalty might be.

According to Apple, cracked iPhones and unauthorized apps befoul the iPhone's "ecosystem," and to be sure, Apple has built a tightly run ship for its users to ride on. One important side-effect of Apple's pristine ecosystem has been the relegation of all adult apps to the iPhone's flourishing black market.

The EFF has countered Apple's objection by citing a wide "body of law" that protects consumers rights to tinker with hardware to make it work better — or however they want.

"One need only transpose Apple's arguments to the world of automobiles to recognize their absurdity," the EFF petition reads. "Sure, GM might tell us that, for our own safety, all servicing should be done by an authorized GM dealer using only genuine GM parts. Toyota might say that swapping your engine could reduce the reliability of your car. And Mazda could say that those who throw a supercharger on their Miatas frequently exceed the legal speed limit."

For more information on the EFF, visit EFF.org. In addition, the EFF has set up a website for consumers to follow the case at FreeYourPhone.org.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Virginia Becomes Latest State to Weigh 'Porn Tax'

The Virginia House of Delegates is considering a bill that would impose a 10% tax on the gross receipts of adult websites doing business in that state.

Elizabeth Skylar Launches Production Banner on VRPorn.com

Elizabeth Skylar has launched her own virtual reality production banner on VRPorn.com.

CrakRevenue Introduces 'Trend Explorer' Feature for Affiliates

CrakRevenue has debuted the new Trend Explorer feature for its affiliates.

Tube Sites Submitter Introduces 'AI Video Description Generator' Feature

Tube Sites Submitter has introduced its new AI Video Description Generator feature for its platform.

Pineapple Support Releases End of Year Review for 2025

Pineapple Support has released its End of Year Review for 2025, detailing the organization's achievements, challenges, and new initiatives.

XBIZ Miami 2026 Lets the Good Times Roll at New South Beach Venue

Pack your favorite shades and sexiest poolside looks, because XBIZ Miami is splashing into a new hotspot — the chic Goodtime Hotel in the heart of Miami Beach — May 11–14.

UPDATED: Arcom Threatens to Block, Delist 2 Adult Sites Over AV Violation

French media regulator Arcom has sent enforcement notices to the operators of two adult websites that the agency says have failed to implement age verification as required under France’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law.

Final Defendant Sentenced in GirlsDoPorn Case

Former adult producer Doug Wiederhold, previously a business partner of GirlsDoPorn owner Michael Pratt, was sentenced on Friday in federal court to four years in prison for conspiracy to commit sex trafficking.

FTC Takes Another Step Toward New 'Click to Cancel' Rule

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is negotiating the latest procedural hurdle in its effort to renew rulemaking concerning negative option plans, after a federal court previously vacated a “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions.

Show More