Michigan Children's Protection Registry Act Stalled

LANSING, Mich. — The idea behind the Michigan Children's Protection Registry Act was simple: protect children from viewing adult content online by letting parents sign up for a registry that would officially bar purveyors of adult products from emailing any addresses on the list.

Problem is, state officials have found enacting such legislation is incredibly complicated, to say nothing of wrought with First Amendment and free speech issues.

As such, the Act still remains in the Michigan House, quietly awaiting approval of two last-minute bills designed to clean up some of its vague language. One bill stipulates the maximum amount violators of the Act can be fined, while the other is trying to make it more affordable for smaller businesses to comply with the Act’s compliance requirements.

State officials said the Act could be up and running as soon as Oct. 30, four months after nearly 3,000 parents and 27 schools signed up for the registry.

The wait time has angered many state residents, adding fire to the already controversial legislation that began last summer when Michigan and Utah became the first states to offer Do-Not-Email registries specifically for children.

The law doesn’t merely target porn producers. Emails that advertise alcohol, tobacco, gambling, lotteries, illegal drugs, firearms and even fireworks are also banned, and Michigan holds companies individually responsible if emails for any of the above products reach an email address submitted to the registry. Violations are currently punishable by up to three years in jail and a $30,000 fine.

The severity of the punishments has caused quite a stir in the business world, with many citing the cost of compliance as a primary issue with the Act. As it stands now, companies must remove email addresses from their marketing campaigns within 30 days of their registration, but to do this they have to pay the state $.007 for each address checked.

Consequently, scrubbing 2 million email addresses would cost $14,000. Checking it every month would add up to $168,000 a year in compliance costs.

Enforcement is another major issue, begging the question how the state will even be able to track down violators in the first place.

“Everyone's looking for a silver bullet, but this is not it,” said Trevor Hughes, executive director of the Email Service Provider Coalition “This law suggests every pornographer should scrub their lists against the registry in Michigan. It's very difficult to enforce that.

“We frequently say many spammers enjoy the impunity of anonymity,” he said.

For now, state officials who support the Act said they would continue to spread the world throughout the state, hoping the recent legislative delays haven’t forced the Act from the public’s consciousness.

“There are thoughts about how we will re-educate the public about this law,” said Dennis Darnoi, a spokesman for Sen. Mike Bishop, who helped sponsor the law. “There's definitely concern too much time has passed.”

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Final Defendant Sentenced in GirlsDoPorn Case

Former adult producer Doug Wiederhold, previously a business partner of GirlsDoPorn owner Michael Pratt, was sentenced on Friday in federal court to four years in prison for conspiracy to commit sex trafficking.

FTC Takes Another Step Toward New 'Click to Cancel' Rule

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is negotiating the latest procedural hurdle in its effort to renew rulemaking concerning negative option plans, after a federal court previously vacated a “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions.

AV Bulletin: Health Warnings, VPNs and Exemptions

Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, more state age verification laws have been introduced around the United States, as well as at the federal level and in other countries. This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Pornhub to Block UK Users Without Accounts Starting Feb. 2

Pornhub parent company Aylo will block access to its free video-sharing platforms in the United Kingdom starting Feb. 2 unless users have already set up accounts prior to that date, the company announced Tuesday.

Aylo Wins Another Major Piracy Lawsuit

For the second time in recent weeks, Pornhub parent company Aylo has prevailed in a copyright infringement case against sites pirating its content.

Arizona State Legislator Proposes Porn Ban

A member of Arizona’s House of Representatives on Wednesday introduced a bill that would make it illegal to produce or distribute adult content in that state.

SCOTUS Won't Hear Appeal in NYC Adult Businesses Zoning Case

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal by a group of adult businesses of a lower court’s decision allowing enforcement of a 2001 zoning law aimed at forcing adult retail stores out of most parts of New York City.

Florida Congressman Files Latest Bill to Repeal Section 230

Rep. Jimmy Patronis of Florida has become the latest member of Congress to propose legislation that would repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

Irish Parliamentary Committee Weighs Stricter AV Laws

The Irish national parliament’s Joint Committee on Arts, Media, Communications, Culture and Sport met Wednesday to discuss regulation of online platforms and improving online safety, including calls for stricter age verification by adult sites.

Ofcom Issues Guidance on Age Check Placement for Adult Sites

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Wednesday published its recommendations for where and how adult sites should deploy age checks as required for compliance with the Online Safety Act.

Show More