FBI Violated Surveillance Laws

WASHINGTON — In cases that range from snagging bank records to eavesdropping on emails, classified documents obtained by the Washington Post today suggest the FBI has violated state and federal surveillance laws in a number of its investigations.

According to records declassified in an ongoing Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought on by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), hundreds of potentially illegal activities were authorized by the FBI in recent years, especially following the terrorists attacks in New York on Sept. 11.

The papers include cases where emails and bank records were obtained without proper warrants, “unconsented physical” searches of suspects were authorized and even years of covert surveillance in the U.S. of suspects who were tracked without the Justice Department’s knowledge, which is a violation of Justice guidelines.

The documents have already sparked debate in the House and Senate, where politicians must once again face the controversial freedoms laid out in the Patriot Act, which made searching and surveillance easier for law enforcement after Sept. 11 but has consistently ignited controversy as a potential time bomb of civil liberties abuse.

“We're seeing what might be the tip of the iceberg at the FBI and across the intelligence community,” EPIC's General Counsel David Sobel said. “It indicates that the existing mechanisms do not appear adequate to prevent abuses or to ensure the public that abuses that are identified are treated seriously and remedied.”

The FBI, however, is taking the cases lightly, saying the “abuses” were little more than a result of clerical errors or minor miscommunications.

“Every investigator wants to make sure that their investigation is handled appropriately, because they're not going to be allowed to keep information that they didn't have the proper authority to obtain,” one senior FBI official told the Post, speaking anonymously during the ongoing case. “But that is a relatively uncommon occurrence. The vast majority of the [cases] reported have to do with administrative timelines and time frames for renewing orders.”

Nonetheless, Sobel said 287 violations were found between 2002 and 2004 alone, and is calling for legislation that would require the attorney general to report any FBI violations to the Senate. To aid their case, Sobel and other EPIC representatives sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee today claiming the new documents prove very little is known about how the FBI conducts itself.

The adult community is, of course, no stranger to the eye of the FBI. The EPIC case comes just weeks after the offices of Max Hardcore’s Max World Entertainment were raided by the FBI and a month after the FBI established an anti-obscenity squad to target obscenity abuses throughout the country.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Politicians Aim to Study Effects of FOSTA-SESTA on Sex Workers

In an encouraging sign for sex workers, California State Representative Ro Khanna and U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts have reintroduced the SAFE SEX Workers Study Act, which aims to study the effects of FOSTA-SESTA.

Texas Bill Aims to Ban Sex Toys at 'Big-Box' Retailers

Republican State Representative Hillary Hickland has introduced a bill in the Texas legislature that would restrict the sale of pleasure products at "big-box" and other non-adult retailers.

U.S. Solicitor General to Participate in FSC v Paxton

The Supreme Court on Monday granted a motion by the U.S. solicitor general to participate in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the case challenging Texas’ controversial age verification law.

Judge Pauses Lawsuit Over Indiana AV Law

A U.S. district court judge has paused a lawsuit over Indiana’s age verification law, pending the Supreme Court's ruling in the Free Speech Coalition-led challenge to Texas’ age verification law, HB 1181.

ASACP Urges Compliance With UK Online Safety Act

LOS ANGELES — The Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) has issued a statement advising adult companies to prepare to comply with the age assurance provisions of the U.K.'s Online Safety Act, which go into effect in 2025.

Pornhub Rejects Claim It Plans to 'Avoid' Age Verification in UK

Pornhub parent company Aylo told XBIZ on Monday that a recent report claiming the site will use a “loophole” to sidestep age verification requirements under the U.K.’s Online Safety Act is “misleading,” and that the company will always ensure its sites are compliant.

FSC Sues Tennessee Over AV Law, Seeks Preliminary Injunction

Free Speech Coalition, along with a group of adult industry stakeholders, has filed a legal challenge to Tennessee’s age verification law and requested an expedited preliminary injunction against enforcement.

Satisfyer Helps Dutch Police Dismantle Counterfeit Network

Satisfyer has teamed up with Dutch authorities to help dismantle a counterfeit network that sold fake products online, including items purporting to be the brand's Pro 2 and Penguin vibrators.

Indiana, Ohio AGs File Amicus Brief in Support of Texas AV Law

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, along with Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and officials from 22 other states, on Friday filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law.

Kansas Law Firm Deploys Religion, Bunk Science While Recruiting Plaintiffs Under AV Law

Kansas-based personal injury law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley is promoting debunked scientific theories and leveraging religious affiliation against the industry while it seeks potential plaintiffs for lawsuits against adult companies under the state’s age verification law.

Show More