Adult Industry Again Shut Out of Congressional Hearings

WASHINGTON — For the third time this year, federal legislators held a hearing on the adult entertainment industry without inviting or allowing a single representative from the industry.

“This is the third time we’ve been frozen out,” Adult Freedom Foundation spokesperson John Pauly told XBiz of the Nov. 10 hearing before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution.

“We’ve sent letters, made phone calls, followed up with emails,” Pauly said. “The first time we were frozen out, they said it was too late because they had already posted the witness list. Then, at one point, Congress postponed the hearing, and we wrote another note saying what a golden opportunity it would be to let us have our say. But they came up with another excuse.”

All three hearings have been chaired by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., a vocal critic of the adult industry.

Free Speech Coalition Communications Director Tom Hymes said the FSC has been similarly not been allowed to provide an expert witness at previous hearings. The FSC has, however, submitted written testimony countering claims by anti-adult witnesses invited to speak at the hearings.

Witnesses at the Nov. 10 hearing, titled “Why the Government Should Care About Pornography: The State Interest in Protecting Children and Families,” include:

  • Jill Manning, a Utah-based marriage and family therapist and doctoral student at Mormon-operated Brigham Young University;
  • Pamela Paul, author of “Pornified: How Pornography Is Transforming Our Lives, Our Relationships and Our Families”;
  • Richard R. Whidden Jr., executive director and senior counsel for the National Law Center for Children and Families in Fairfax, Va.
  • Pauly pointed out that every witness on that list is hostile to the adult industry and that their testimony, like the testimony at the two previous hearings, presents a biased and one-sided view of the issues being discussed.

    For example, Manning has called for government regulation of adult websites.

    “Research [has shown] that sexually explicit material on the Internet is very intrusive,” she said. “So even the families that are diligent about protecting themselves need some help. This cannot be done just by individuals choosing not to be exposed. It's too intrusive.”

    Other witnesses at past hearings have presented questionable data trying to link pornography with sex crimes and pedophilia and have claimed that adult entertainment destroys families and is as addictive as heroine and crack cocaine.

    However, Pauly added that there is a ray of hope on the horizon. He said the AFF has been in communication with committee co-chair Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wisc., and he is confident that Feingold will seriously consider including a representative from the AFF as a witness at future hearings.

    Prepared testimony from witnesses at the Nov. 10 hearing is available at Judiciary.Senate.gov.

    Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
    Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

    More News

    Florida Congressman Files Latest Bill to Repeal Section 230

    Rep. Jimmy Patronis of Florida has become the latest member of Congress to propose legislation that would repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

    Irish Parliamentary Committee Weighs Stricter AV Laws

    The Irish national parliament’s Joint Committee on Arts, Media, Communications, Culture and Sport met Wednesday to discuss regulation of online platforms and improving online safety, including calls for stricter age verification by adult sites.

    Ofcom Issues Guidance on Age Check Placement for Adult Sites

    U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Wednesday published its recommendations for where and how adult sites should deploy age checks as required for compliance with the Online Safety Act.

    Former IEAU Officer Sentenced to 4 Months

    Amanda Gullesserian, who performed in the industry under the name Phyllisha Anne and founded the now-defunct International Entertainment Adult Union (IEAU), has been sentenced to four months’ imprisonment for making a false statement in an IEAU federal financial report.

    Utah State Legislator Proposes New 'Porn Tax'

    A Utah state senator introduced a bill on Monday that would impose a 7% tax on the gross receipts of adult websites doing business in that state, plus require adult sites to pay an annual $500 fee.

    Arcom-Targeted Sites Implement Age Verification in France

    Five high-traffic adult websites based outside of France have implemented age verification as required under the nation’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, after receiving warnings from French media regulator Arcom.

    Florida Attorney General Dismisses AV Suit Against Segpay

    The Florida attorney general’s office on Monday agreed to dismiss claims against payment processor Segpay in a lawsuit over alleged noncompliance with the state’s age verification law.

    FTC Weighs Reboot of 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking Process

    The Federal Trade Commission has invited public comments on a petition to renew trade regulation rulemaking concerning negative option plans, after a federal court previously vacated a “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions.

    New Federal Bills Aim to Repeal Section 230

    Members of Congress this week introduced two bills calling for the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

    House of Lords Approves UK Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

    The House of Lords, the U.K.’s upper house of Parliament, has agreed to amendments to the pending Crime and Policing Bill that would make depicting “choking” in pornography illegal and designate it a “priority offense” under the Online Safety Act.

    Show More