Maryland Lawmaker Seeks to Ban True Voyeur Content

BALTIMORE — Mentioning sites such as Upskirt.com and ChurchUpskirts.com by name, Delegate Neil F. Quinter, D-Howard, says he is determined to pass a law making it illegal to take voyeuristic photos or videotape or to post voyeur content on the Internet.

Quinter held a news conference this week to announce that he is introducing a bill that would ban upskirts and downblouses, and he is doing it early enough in the 90-day legislative session to ensure that both the Maryland House and Senate have plenty of time to weigh and vote on its merits.

A bill that would have outlawed upskirting died in the state Senate last year because the session ended before it came to a vote. Another law that would have made it possible to prosecute webmasters who post voyeur content also never came to a vote because time ran out.

Quinter said he became passionate about the issue while he was doing research and typed the word "upskirt" into Google.

"I was not prepared for what I got, which was all these porn sites," he said.

Even if the law does pass, it would only apply to residents of Maryland.

Quinter was accompanied at the press conference by Shelley Lebel, a woman who testified at hearings on the bills that died in the last legislative session that she had been traumatized by when pictures of her cleavage were posted online. She said she will be back to testify again, if necessary.

“If Britney Spears can get her baby pictures taken off the web, then why can't Maryland women get unsolicited pictures of themselves taken off the web?” she asked.

Lebel said she was shocked and frustrated to find out downblousing is not illegal and she could not prosecute the man who took her picture. Voyeurs in the digital age are frustrating prosecutors across the U.S. because snapping pictures up skirts and down blouses is not against the law in most states.

Although 38 states have privacy laws concerning the use of cameras, only 19 specifically punish video voyeurism, and half of those do so only for “private” areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Public areas, such as malls, usually do not fall into this category.

Federal law also does prohibit taking photos of a person without his or her consent in private places such as bathrooms and dressing rooms but offers no protection against such photographs in public places. Also, there are currently no specific laws against posting upskirt and downblouse photos on the Internet.

Prosecutors sometimes can go after offenders by charging them with other crimes, such as disorderly conduct.

First Amendment attorney Lawrence Walters warned that Maryland lawmakers should be careful not to go too far in any attempts to regulate the Internet, adding that, in his opinion, the majority of online voyeur content is staged.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Two Texas Bills Restricting Sex Toy Sales Fail to Pass

Two bills aimed at restricting sales of sex toys have failed to pass the Texas state legislature during its 2025 session.

NYC Adult Stores Petition for Rehearing in Zoning Law Case

A group of adult businesses on Tuesday petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit to rehear a case involving a zoning law that could severely limit adult stores’ operations in New York City.

Ofcom Releases Transparency Reporting Guidelines

Ofcom, the U.K. media regulator, has made public its official guidance detailing how online service providers — including adult sites — will be required to publish annual transparency reports on their efforts to protect children from online harms.

New AV Rules Take Effect for Ireland-Based Sites

Ireland’s Online Safety Code came into force Monday, including a provision requiring adult sites headquartered in Ireland to implement age assurance measures beyond self-declaration.

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

JuicyAds Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

JuicyAds has won its World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) case against a website using a similar domain to impersonate the company's site and defraud customers.

France Reinstates Age Verification Rule for EU Sites

France’s highest court, the Council of State, on Tuesday reinstated age verification rules for EU-based sites under the country’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, ruling in favor of the French government and against Hammy Media.

European Commission Approves AV Guidelines, Unveils Prototype App

The European Commission on Monday released its final, approved guidelines for protecting minors online under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and made public a “white label” age verification app intended to help sites and platforms comply with age verification rules under the DSA.

Federal Appeals Court Vacates FTC 'Click to Cancel' Rule Pending Review

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit on Tuesday vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions, pending further review.

Show More