Texas Justices Weighing Free Speech Rights With 'Pole Tax'

AUSTIN, Texas — Oral arguments are slated for March 25 in a Texas Supreme Court case that may decide whether the government can tax content protected by the 1st Amendment.

The issue at hand is the legality of charging a $5-per-person “pole tax” to customers of Texas’ 115 strip clubs and other adult entertainment venues, which Texas justices have decided to weigh.

The state, which has collected more than $12 million in fees that have been held in escrow pending the final outcome of the case, lost a round at court when a judge struck down the pole tax in March 2008. The state lost again in June when a state court of appeals decided the tax’s fate.

The law, passed in the 2007 legislative session, originally directed revenues collected from the fee toward sexual abuse and violence treatment and prevention programs, but it has been mired in legal challenges since it took effect.

Last year, an alternative measure was introduced that would include a 10 percent tax to those sexually oriented businesses that charge an admission fee. But the measure was postponed nine months ago.

That bill was hammered out with the help of members of the Texas Entertainment Association, an industry trade association for Texas strip-club owners.

Texas litigator David A. Furlow, who has represented businesses in numerous cases involving 1st Amendment protections, told the Houston Chronicle that the central issue of the pole tax is whether the government can levy a tax on speech.

“When you say certain types of messages and certain types of entertainment can be taxed, you begin down a slippery slope that can allow the government to destroy a form of business by taxing it out of existence,” he said.

To defend the law, the government has been forced to argue that strip clubs lead to greater violence against women, a claim for which there is no evidence, Furlow said.

The Utah Supreme Court upheld a similar law last year, ruling that taxing strip club patrons did not have the effect of restricting expression and served “an important state interest.”

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Le Wand 'Dive' Featured in InStyle's List of Recommended Sex Toys

Le Wand’s Dive submersible wand vibrator is featured in “The 7 Best Sex Toys Sexperts Want You to Stash In Your Nightstand” roundup from InStyle.

Kiiroo Debuts 'PowerShot Case' Stroker Add-On

Kiiroo has introduced the PowerShot Case add-on for its Keon, PowerBlow, and PowerShot Strokers.

UPDATED: Court Approves Class Action in Labor Claims Against VMG

A U.S. district court has granted class certification in a civil lawsuit filed against Vixen Media Group (VMG) by retired performer Kenzie Anne, making it possible for additional performers to join in a class action against the company.

LELO Debuts 'Boomerang' Double-Sided Vibrator

LELO has introduced its new Boomerang, the pleasure brand's first double-sided vibrator.

Brazil Invites Public Input on Guidelines for New Digital Law

Brazil’s National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) is soliciting public comments to help improve interpretation and application of the country’s Digital Statute for Children and Adolescents (Digital ECA), which requires adult websites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Svakom Debuts 'Klitty' 3-in-1 Vibe

Svakom has introduced its new Klitty three-function vibrator.

Magic Silk Debuts 'Wisteria Mist' Collection

Magic Silk has introduced its new Wisteria Mist line of lingerie.

Orion Expands 'Beau Coeur' Collection

Orion Wholesale has introduced three new pleasure products from its Beau Coeur collection.

PinkCherry Launches 'Scream Your Own Name' Campaign

PinkCherry has launched its Scream Your Own Name promotional campaign.

UK Outlaws Content Featuring Choking, Adults Portraying Underage Characters

The U.K.’s Crime and Policing Bill received final passage in Parliament on Monday, including provisions criminalizing depictions of “non-fatal strangulation” as well as sexual content in which adults portray underage characters.

Show More