Texas Justices Weighing Free Speech Rights With 'Pole Tax'

AUSTIN, Texas — Oral arguments are slated for March 25 in a Texas Supreme Court case that may decide whether the government can tax content protected by the 1st Amendment.

The issue at hand is the legality of charging a $5-per-person “pole tax” to customers of Texas’ 115 strip clubs and other adult entertainment venues, which Texas justices have decided to weigh.

The state, which has collected more than $12 million in fees that have been held in escrow pending the final outcome of the case, lost a round at court when a judge struck down the pole tax in March 2008. The state lost again in June when a state court of appeals decided the tax’s fate.

The law, passed in the 2007 legislative session, originally directed revenues collected from the fee toward sexual abuse and violence treatment and prevention programs, but it has been mired in legal challenges since it took effect.

Last year, an alternative measure was introduced that would include a 10 percent tax to those sexually oriented businesses that charge an admission fee. But the measure was postponed nine months ago.

That bill was hammered out with the help of members of the Texas Entertainment Association, an industry trade association for Texas strip-club owners.

Texas litigator David A. Furlow, who has represented businesses in numerous cases involving 1st Amendment protections, told the Houston Chronicle that the central issue of the pole tax is whether the government can levy a tax on speech.

“When you say certain types of messages and certain types of entertainment can be taxed, you begin down a slippery slope that can allow the government to destroy a form of business by taxing it out of existence,” he said.

To defend the law, the government has been forced to argue that strip clubs lead to greater violence against women, a claim for which there is no evidence, Furlow said.

The Utah Supreme Court upheld a similar law last year, ruling that taxing strip club patrons did not have the effect of restricting expression and served “an important state interest.”

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Paradise Debuts 'Illumination' Line

Paradise Pleasure Products has introduced its new Illumination collection of pleasure products.

Orion Debuts New Styles From 'Svenjoyment' Line

Orion Wholesale has released four new styles from its Svenjoyment undergarment line.

Viben Acquires Get Lucky, Mini Halo Brands

Viben has acquired the Get Lucky and Mini Halo pleasure product brands.

Paul Reutershan Joins National Sales Team

Paul Reutershan has joined the sales team at National Distribution.

Starship Introduces New Wellness, Pleasure Product Lines

Starship has debuted its new On My Mind lubricant line and Devil Got Bound bondage collection.

Eldorado, Paradise Ink US Distro Deal for 'Art of Illumination' Collection

Eldorado Trading has inked an exclusive U.S. distribution deal with Paradise Pleasure Products for the new Art of Illumination collection of pleasure products.

Sliquid Expands Massage Oil Collection

Wellness brand Sliquid has introduced two new scented oils to its Massage collection.

Nexus Debuts 'Ascend' Rotating, Thrusting Massager

Nexus has introduced its new Ascend thrusting and rotating massager.

Lovense Debuts 1st 'AI Companion' Love Doll

Lovense has introduced its first AI Companion Doll at the 2026 Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas.

Former IEAU Officer Sentenced to 4 Months

Amanda Gullesserian, who performed in the industry under the name Phyllisha Anne and founded the now-defunct International Entertainment Adult Union (IEAU), has been sentenced to four months’ imprisonment for making a false statement in an IEAU federal financial report.

Show More