Top Attorneys Focus on Legal Landscape at XBIZ LA

LOS ANGELES — A renowned panel of adult industry attorneys covered a wide variety of legal topics impacting today's adult entertainment industry from file-sharing suits, 2257, obscenity prosecutions, .XXX and a new law that affects webmasters who engage in cross sales.

Nearly a hundred attendees filled the seats at the Adult Law: Today's Legal Landscape seminar at XBIZ LA to learn how to leverage the current laws to better protect themselves in the ever-changing legal landscape.

Moderated by XBIZ's executive director of publishing, Don Parret, the panel included attorneys Al Gelbard, Evan Stone, J.D. Obenberger, Greg Piccionelli and Marc Randazza.

One topic that was briefly touched on was the new law that prohibits cross sales, the passing of a customer's credit card information to a third party. More specifically, if webmasters have a free trial offer with a negative option, they might be violating the law.

"The best thing to do is to make sure you're not violating the law," Obenberger said.

He said the free trial offer may be flawed and suggested webmasters look at their terms of service and change the structure if necessary.

"This can be done legally and can be accommodated under the new statute," he added.

Another hot-button issue was the BitTorrent litigation, spearheaded by Evan Stone, who currently has 16 BitTorrent lawsuits pending.

"The sites that are hosting these file-sharing sites are located overseas, so the only alternative is to pursue the end users," Stone said.

Stone said his method of joining together hundreds of users in one lawsuit has worked fairly well, securing wins in most of his cases. He said in order for the case to work, he has to prove that all the pirates had worked together to download the infringing content.

But the one thing he didn't anticipate was the unwillingness of Internet service providers to give evidence such as the names and addresses of the infringers.

Randazza said he respectfully disagreed with Stone's methodology, saying that filing lawsuits against hundreds of BitTorrent users will more than likely get an unusual response from the presiding judge. He said he disagreed with filing the suits in jurisdictions that are comfortable for the attorneys.

"I'd rather go quietly and successfully rather than a big rumble," he said.

Piccionelli said he agreed that BitTorrent litigation is a way to stem the tide of copyright infringement, but not something that should be counted on as a new revenue stream.

He added content producers should consider a few things before going to court. For example, litigation may help producers improve their brand value. He also said producers need to do their homework to make sure how this can be done correctly.

In regards to obscenity prosecutions, Gelbard said he believed the Obscenity Prosecution Task Force, which prosecuted and lost the John Stagliano trial, has been disbanded.

But Obenberger said if that is true, it doesn't mean the pressure is off the adult industry.

"It doesn't mean the federal government isn't interested in porn prosecutions. They'll give the cases to more seasoned lawyers," he said.

The conversation then moved on to the latest developments with 2257.

"While we're making headway, you've got to make sure you're in compliance with 2257," Piccionelli said.

Obenberger added that if 2257 is ruled as constitutional, it will be enforced and there will be inspections.

"Please," he said. "90 percent of people aren't in compliance. If you don't comply, your day of reckoning is going to come."

The discussion then moved on to how 2257 can be used as a weapon in BitTorrent lawsuits where the infringer, who downloaded the illegal content, can be charged with violating the statute. Both Obenberger and Gelbard said this wasn't a good idea.

"It's dangerous to use 2257 as a sword when you're trying to show it's unconstitutional," Gelbard said.

In regards to .XXX, Obenberger said it would give the government too much power.

"It's a death switch. This is evil and it hurts freedom," he said.

Both Randazza and Piccionelli took a more subtle approach and agreed that if .XXX is approved by ICANN, the best thing is to perhaps come up with some kind of compromise and to at least get the two sides talking.

The panel did agree on one thing and that is anyone involved in adult should retain a lawyer who knows about their particular area and always get a second opinion.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC Unpacks SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling in Webinar

The Free Speech Coalition conducted a public webinar Tuesday to help adult industry stakeholders understand the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FSC v. Paxton, and its potential implications.

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Show More