AOL Settles With Playboy

DULLES, Virginia -- Barely a week after Playboy Enterprises was given the greenlight by an appeals court to proceed in a trademark infringement suit against Netscape Communications Inc., a unit of multimedia giant AOL/Time Warner, the two companies have settled, an AOL spokesperson announced.

Prior to today's announcement, there was industry-wide speculation that Playboy could potentially take AOL to the cleaners for damages that date back as far as five years. However, the two companies have decided to settle quietly outside of court.

"A settlement has been reached on this pending litigation," said Nicholas Graham, a spokesman for AOL. "The terms of the settlement are not disclosable."

The U.S. Appeals Court determined on Jan. 15 that a lower court had wrongly ruled in the case against Playboy. Charges stemmed from a 1999 case against now-defunct Excite.com and Netscape for infringing on the "Playboy" and "Playmate" trademarks using misleading search engine banner ads that had nothing to do with Playboy content.

The appeals court gave Playboy the right to sue Netscape for liability.

At the time the infringement occurred, Netscape was using Excite's search engine technology on its site.

In its original lawsuit, Playboy named around 400 words the two companies had used that insinuated a relationship with Playboy Enterprises and deliberately confused consumers. Playboy contended that the misleading banner "tarnished and diluted" its brand name.

The case was originally lost in 2001, but the appeals court last week decided that the Playboy trademark was equally protected in the virtual world as it was in more traditional mediums.

The appeals court decision to overturn an earlier ruling was one of the first times an appellate court has weighed in on the issue of search engine advertising as it relates to trademark infringement.

"The decision makes clear that the rules apply in the actual world with equal force to the virtual world," Playboy's attorney was quoted as saying at last week's ruling. "In the Internet as in the actual world, trademarks are not to be used in a way that is confusing or that dilutes the value of the mark."

In a similar vein, Google filed a complaint in a San Jose court in November 2003 in an effort to make sure that its method for keyword search advertising is within the boundaries of the law, in particular, trademark law.

Google has been in battle with a company called American Blind & Wallpaper Factory that has threatened to sue Google if it doesn't stop selling keyword phrases that the company claims violate its trademarks, CNET reports.

Google reportedly agreed to block keywords that directly infringe on American Blind & Wallpaper trademarks, but the search engine has refused to block all other similar phrases that American Blind feels infringe on its trademark.

Google is no stranger to similar trademark infringement threats. The search engine has also had rifts with eBay over trademark disputes, and luggage maker Louis Vuitton fined Google last year for trademark infringement in a French court.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

New Membership Site 'Sluts Corner' Launches

R18 Entertainment has launched a new membership site, SlutsCorner.com.

Roxie Rae Relaunches Site Through XSiteAbility

Roxie Rae has relaunched her site through XSiteAbility.

Federal Appeals Court Vacates FTC 'Click to Cancel' Rule Pending Review

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit on Tuesday vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions, pending further review.

FSC Drops Florida AV Lawsuit in Wake of SCOTUS Decision

A U.S. district court judge granted on Tuesday a motion by Free Speech Coalition to dismiss the trade association’s lawsuit over Florida’s age verification law, a case that had been on hold pending the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the constitutionality of state AV laws.

Ukrainian President Responds to Porn Legalization Petition

President Volodymyr Zelensky responded Tuesday to an OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine, stating that he would wait for the legislative process to play out “in accordance with established procedure.”

Only Tax Deductions Joins Pineapple Support as Sponsor

Adult industry accounting firm Only Tax Deductions has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

Adult Empire Launches 'Conversations' Podcast Series

Adult Empire has launched a new official podcast series hosted by Nicole Chappelle and Charlie.

Sex Work CEO Launches 'Teams Plan' for AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Teams Plan for its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

2025 XBIZ Amsterdam Website Launches With Call for Speakers

XBIZ is pleased to announce that the website for its annual European conference, XBIZ Amsterdam, is now live.

NC Governor Vetoes Bill Targeting Adult Industry, Override Possible

North Carolina Governor Josh Stein today vetoed a bill imposing new regulations that adult industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Show More