Court Rules Against Perfect 10 in Google Copyright Battle

SAN FRANCISCO — The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Perfect 10 yesterday in its long-running copyright infringement battle with Google.

Perfect 10 claimed that Google’s Image Search significantly poached and posted free images from its website between 2005 and 2010 that resulted in loses of over $50 million from 1996 to 2007, pushing the company close to bankruptcy.

The federal appeals court in Pasadena affirmed a lower court's decision not to grant a preliminary injunction against Google Inc., finding that the Perfect 10 website could not show it had or would suffer irreparable harm.

Judge Sandra Ikuta wrote in the ruling, "While being forced into bankruptcy qualifies as a form of irreparable harm, Perfect 10 has not established that the requested injunction would forestall that fate.

"Perfect 10 has not shown a sufficient causal connection between irreparable harm to Perfect 10's business and Google's operation of its search engine.”

U.S. District Judge A. Howard Matz and a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit unanimously blocked the bid to grant the injunction. The panel found that Perfect 10 had failed to "submit a statement from even a single former subscriber who ceased paying for Perfect 10's service because of the content freely available via Google."

The panel also said that Perfect 10 did not prove that it was in sound financial shape before the alleged infringements.

It wasn’t all bad news for Perfect 10 this week however. The company scored a legal victory in its $5 million copyright suit against file-sharing membership site Megaupload, after a judge advanced the case by ruling that the file-storage site may be liable for direct and contributory infringement.

And in June Perfect 10 filed a separate copyright infringement suit against file storage site Depositfiles.com's for harboring its content. The site's operators were hit with a $5 million suit by Perfect 10, which called the business "not a legitimate file storage company and has none of the characteristics of one."

XBIZ was not immediately able to reach Perfect 10 for comment on yesterday's ruling at post time.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

What Changes in DC Could Mean for the Adult Industry

On November 5, 2024, American voters were called to the polls. The results of that election revealed an unquestionably uncomfortable truth for everyone, regardless of party or ideology: the “united” part of United States does not appear to be holding strong.

Kansas Sues Adult Website Operator Under AV Law

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach has filed suit against SARJ LLC, alleging that the company’s adult websites have failed to implement age verification as mandated by state law.

Judge Pauses FSC Lawsuit Over Florida AV Law

A U.S. district court judge has paused Free Speech Coalition’s lawsuit over Florida’s age verification law, pending the Supreme Court's ruling in the FSC-led challenge to Texas’ age verification law, HB 1181.

Will Co. Wins Legal Battle Against Pirate Sites

After a nearly four-year court battle, Japanese adult entertainment producer Will Co. has been awarded $4.5 million in damages and ownership of domains formerly belonging to the operator of now-shuttered MissAV.com and other high-traffic pirate sites.

Ofcom Releases Age Assurance Guidelines

U.K. communications regulator Ofcom released on Thursday its finalized official guidance on what constitutes “highly effective” age assurance, which adult sites are required to implement under the U.K.’s Online Safety Act (OSA).

Supreme Court Hears Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the case challenging Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Federal Judge Upholds Injunction Against Tennessee AV Law Pending Appeal

A federal judge has denied Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti's motion to lift an injunction against enforcement of the state's new age verification law, which was scheduled to go into effect Jan. 1.

Politicians Aim to Study Effects of FOSTA-SESTA on Sex Workers

In an encouraging sign for sex workers, California State Representative Ro Khanna and U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts have reintroduced the SAFE SEX Workers Study Act, which aims to study the effects of FOSTA-SESTA.

Texas Bill Aims to Ban Sex Toys at 'Big-Box' Retailers

Republican State Representative Hillary Hickland has introduced a bill in the Texas legislature that would restrict the sale of pleasure products at "big-box" and other non-adult retailers.

U.S. Solicitor General to Participate in FSC v Paxton

The Supreme Court on Monday granted a motion by the U.S. solicitor general to participate in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the case challenging Texas’ controversial age verification law.

Show More