Walters: Some Aspects of Calif.'s SB 255 Go Too Far

SACRAMENTO — Both the state Senate and Assembly passed SB 255 this week, possibly giving California law enforcement officials their first tool to battle so-called “revenge porn."

Gov. Jerry Brown has 30 days to sign the bill into law. If signed, SB 255 would take effect immediately.

SB 255, introduced by state Sen. Anthony Cannella, would amend a section of the Penal Code and make it a crime to "cause serious emotional distress" to others by distributing over the Internet nude or semi-nude images of them.

Images in violation, as defined by the bill, would include portions of genitals and, in the case of a female, portions of breasts below the top of the areola, that is either "uncovered or visible through less than fully opaque clothing."

SB 255 would punish convicted operators with six-month jail sentences and imposing fines of $1,000 — even if the pictures were originally taken with consent.  Subsequent fines would amount to penalties not exceeding $2,000, along with one-year jail sentences.

The bill would prohibit only images taken by the person posting them, meaning that self-photos aren’t protected.

XBIZ asked adult entertainment attorney Lawrence Walters of the Walters Law Group on Friday to discuss the piece of legislation's ramifications, particularly for online adult operators.

XBIZ: Larry, what's your take on California's legislation to curb revenge porn?

LARRY WALTERS:  It goes without saying that the activity of ‘revenge porn’ is reprehensible and slimy. The perpetrators should face legal consequences.

But SB 255 goes too far in some ways, and is oddly inadequate in others. Initially, I have a fundamental concern with criminalizing the publication of material that is still considered protected speech. The agreement to maintain the privacy of intimate photographs does not take those images outside the realm of First Amendment protection. Imposing jail time against those who record and publish such images seems counter to free speech principles, and somewhat of an over-reaction to the problem.

A better solution may have been to create a private civil cause of action against those who released such private photos, along with statutory damages and attorneys fees. Injunctions could also be available against the publishers of material found to violate the state. There would be no shortage of California attorneys coming to the rescue of ex-girlfriends (and boyfriends) who have been victimized by this conduct, so long as there was a financial incentive to do so.

 A crushing financial judgment would be sufficient punishment in these cases, without slicing off another piece of content that would otherwise be protected by the First Amendment, and putting it in the criminal realm. The state of Florida rejected a similar revenge porn proposal last term, after serious constitutional questions were raised about the proposed statute’s validity. 

XBIZ: How about self-photos? The bill was changed by lawmakers in the last hours to not protect those types of pictures.

WALTERS: While the bill seeks to severely punish those who record and release intimate moments, it does nothing to address the more common phenomena of "selfies";  i.e., pictures taken by one’s self, with one’s own camera. The California bill requires that the perpetrator also be the photographer. The same injustice is done to a victim who’s private photo is released by an ex-boyfriend who received a self-produced, erotic "gift" before the relationship soured.  Under SB 255, those victims appear to be out of luck.

XBIZ: How about other concerns with the bill?

WALTERS: The final concern with the bill relates to its potential application of the criminal penalties to online service providers or websites that might ultimately distribute these pictures uploaded by users, without any knowledge that they were made public without necessary consent. There is no realistic way that a website operator could determine whether each erotic image provided by a user was accompanied by the necessary level of approval or consent by the person(s) depicted.  Section 230 and DMCA safe harbor specifically recognize that such burden would be unreasonable.

However, given the potential for application of accomplice liability theories, such as "aiding and abetting" or "conspiracy," an online service provider could theoretically get dragged into a criminal prosecution under this new bill, as a party who substantially assisted in the publication of the image, or who formed an agreement to publish the image.  Exemptions should be built into any law like this, protecting unwitting website operators who merely provide web space for users to upload material of their choosing. Both the First Amendment and the policies underlying Section 230 immunity require this sort of exemption.

View SB 255 (amended Sept. 3)

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

XBIZ Miami's Host Hotel Sold Out, General Registration Now Open

Guest rooms at XBIZ Miami’s exclusive conference venue, Nautilus Sonesta Miami Beach hotel in South Beach, are now completely sold out.

Adult Industry Educational, Networking Platform 'Imperfectly You' Launches

Imperfectly You, an educational and networking platform for adult industry workers, has officially launched.

Segpay to Launch News Network for High-Risk Merchants

Segpay has announced that it will launch the Segpay News Network (SNN) on April 15.

Age Verification Watch: Patching the Holes

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Pineapple Support to Host Autism Spectrum Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group for performers and creators who are, or suspect they may be, on the autism spectrum.

ImLive Launches Revamped Member Loyalty Program

Cam platform ImLive has revamped its member loyalty program.

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

Show More