Randazza: Copyright Ruling May Have Implications for Adult Industry

LAS VEGAS — This week, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that actors and actresses have copyright rights in their performances when they act in a video. 

On February 26, 2014, the court issued its opinion in Garcia v. Google Inc., No. 12-57308, arising from the controversial “Innocence of Muslims” film.

The plaintiff, Cindy Lee Garcia, claimed that she never signed a release for the production, and moreover was lied to about the nature of the work she’d be doing.

Garcia claimed she was promised a role in a desert adventure movie – but instead was depicted in an anti-Islamic film, where her lines were dubbed over with criticism of the Prophet Muhammed.

When Garcia began receiving death threats for her role in the film, she sent take-down notices to Google under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, claiming she had rights in her performance in the video. Google refused to remove the video. 

Garcia sued Google in federal court, seeking an injunction against Google displaying the video.  The trial court denied Garcia’s request for an injunction, and she appealed to the 9th Circuit.

The 9th Circuit’s opinion held that Garcia had a sufficient copyright right in her performance, despite the fact that she only appeared in the film for a few seconds, to remove the film from circulation.

The court found that Garcia had created an original work in her performance, which was copyrightable, and that she retained those rights because she did not execute a valid model release transferring them to the film’s creator. The court also found that film producers normally have an implied license in the performance of actors and actresses appearing in their creations, but that the film’s creator far exceeded that license in this case.

Under the Copyright Act, it is novel – though not unprecedented – for the court to find a performer has copyright rights in his or her performance.  An actor’s performance contains originality and may be preserved in a fixed form, satisfying the standards for copyrightability under the Copyright Act.

Nevertheless, no court has ever found these rights to be quite this expansive, nor has a court ever granted rights on such a limited performance.

Most commentators have criticized the ruling, stating that there should be no such copyrights.  Nevertheless, whether these rights should exist or not, they can be assigned to a producer using a proper model release form. 

In the Garcia case, there were many issues with the model release that the 9th Circuit did not resolve, ranging from whether Garcia was fraudulently induced to sign it, to whether her signature was forged. Because there was not a valid release assigning the copyright rights in her performance to the producer, she retained the rights to her performance. A strong and valid model release could have avoided this problem entirely.

As to the producer’s implied license to Garcia’s performance, this too could have been avoided with a proper model release.

The 9th Circuit’s opinion turned on the producer’s representation to Garcia that she would be acting in a desert adventure movie. If “Innocence of Muslims” had been a desert adventure movie, its producer would have had an implied license to her performance even if she retained the rights.

However, because the final film was so radically different from what Garcia says she agreed to appear in, the producer violated the implied license to use her performance.

The 9th Circuit did not articulate a clear standard for when there may be an implied license violation, and this decision has the potential to create much confusion.  A broad and clearly written model release can avoid any question about what license a performer gives a producer to use her performance. This should be a non-issue if the model release transfers the actor’s performance rights to the producer.

But, to the extent any copyright rights in the actor’s performance remain with him or her, the implied license to use the performance cannot be violated if it is broadly written and clearly stated. For example, a strong model release should expressly state that the performance is to be used for a pornographic video, and that the footage of him or her can be used for any purpose at all.  his way, there is no confusion as to what use of the actor’s performance is allowed.

The 9th Circuit’s ruling in Garcia has the potential to cause great turmoil between performers and producers. 

Most adult producers are familiar with the concept of “actor’s remorse.” This decision ensures that there will be more “actor’s remorse” claims, as it gives revengeful actors a strong tool with which to create mischief. 

By using appropriate model releases, though, adult producers can minimize the risks that will present themselves in the wake of this decision.  All of the potential uncertainty caused by the Garcia decision could have been avoided if the film’s producer used a model release that assigned the actress’ performance rights to him, and accurately disclosed how her performance would be used.

Marc Randazza is the managing partner at Randazza Legal Group. The firm has offices in Las Vegas and Miami, both specializing in intellectual property, First Amendment and Internet law. The author recently completed an LLM degree in international intellectual property Law administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization and the University of Turin Faculty of Law in Italy.

(c) Marc Randazza.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Haley Spades Stars in Latest From Immoral

Haley Spades stars with Charlie Dean, Matt Bird, and Dean Van Damme in a new three-part release from Immoral Productions, directed by "Porno Dan" Leal.

Octavia Red Makes Her Vampired Debut

Octavia Red has made her Vampired debut alongside Talia Mint and 2023 XMA Europas Female Performer of the Year Tiffany Tatum in the new feature “Hunters.”

Lily Starfire Fronts Latest From Brazzers

Lily Starfire stars with Kyle Mason in the latest release from Brazzers, titled "Eating Ass Is the Game."

Country Hotwife Makes Her WIFEY Debut

Content creator Country Hotwife has made her debut for Vixen Media Group (VMG) studio imprint WIFEY, alongside her husband StagHubby and former XMAs Male Performer of the Year Isiah Maxwell.

Vixen Media Group Celebrates 10 Years of 'Tushy'

Vixen Media Group (VMG) is celebrating the 10-year anniversary of studio imprint Tushy.

Cherry Kiss Stars in Latest 'Blind Dates' From Bellesa

Cherry Kiss headlines the 16th volume of "Blind Dates," from Bellesa.

Emma Rosie Toplines Pat Myne's 'Gape For Days 5'

Emma Rosie headlines director Pat Myne's "Gape For Days 5," from Evil Angel.

Adult Time Drops 2nd Installment of Bree Mills Thriller 'Escape From Camp Conversion'

Adult Time has debuted the second episode of the Bree Mills-helmed thriller "Escape From Camp Conversion," from studio brand Girlcore.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Eris Jolie Makes Her TransAngels Debut

Eris Jolie has made her TransAngels debut alongside Bree Brooks in "A Very Filthy Cookout."

Show More