U.S. Appeals Court Delivers Key Ruling on PC Privacy at Work

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court has ruled that an employee whose office was not shared with coworkers and was kept locked had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his workplace computer.

But the 9th U.S Circuit Court of Appeals also said in an opinion published Wednesday that the employee’s 4th Amendment right wasn’t violated when a warrantless search turned up a history of child porn visits on the company PC.

Employee Brian Ziegler, who worked for third-party online processor Frontline Processing, had appealed to the higher court after he failed to win a motion to suppress evidence from the U.S. District Court over his 2001 arrest by the FBI.

(A Frontline executive told XBIZ that the Montana-based company does not process online adult accounts.)

Ziegler came to the agency’s attention when the owner of Frontline’s ISP notified the FBI that a Frontline employee had visited child porn websites from a workplace computer, court documents said.

Ziegler, who was the company’s director of operations, pled not guilty and moved to suppress the images retrieved from the search of his workplace computer after being indicted on charges of receiving and possessing child porn in May 2003.

In court documents, Frontline employees said they obtained a key to Ziegler’s private office from a Frontline executive and opened the computer, making two copies of the hard drive.

Later, the employees voluntarily turned over the content to the FBI, explaining that all of the company-owned PCs in the office were routinely monitored.

The FBI explained in a court filing that because the company voluntarily turned over the PC, which had numerous cache images of child porn, it had no need to ask for a search warrant.

On rehearing, the 9th Circuit said that the federal judge was correct in denying the motion to suppress evidence, but the three-judge panel arrived at the conclusion on different grounds from U.S. District Court.

The circuit judges said that Ziegler did have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his office and workplace computer, but the search of his workplace computer was excepted from the constitutional warrant requirement because it was authorized by an officer of the company.

Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, who wrote for the panel, explained in the ruling that warrantless searches are valid where the government obtains voluntary consent either from the criminal suspect or from a third party with “common authority” over the premises or items the government seeks to inspect.

O’Scannlain also said that Frontline exercised common authority over Ziegler’s computer because it had complete administrative access to all of its employees’ computers and, with employees’ knowledge, had installed a firewall to monitor their Internet traffic.

“Although Ziegler retained a legitimate expectation of privacy in his workplace office, Frontline retained the ability to consent to a search of Ziegler’s office and his business computer. And because valid third-party consent to search the office and computer located therein was given by his employer, the district court’s order denying suppression of the evidence of child pornography existing on Ziegler’s computer is affirmed.”

The case is U.S. vs. Ziegler, 05-30177.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Federal Judge Upholds Injunction Against Tennessee AV Law Pending Appeal

A federal judge has denied Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti's motion to lift an injunction against enforcement of the state's new age verification law, which was scheduled to go into effect Jan. 1.

Politicians Aim to Study Effects of FOSTA-SESTA on Sex Workers

In an encouraging sign for sex workers, California State Representative Ro Khanna and U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts have reintroduced the SAFE SEX Workers Study Act, which aims to study the effects of FOSTA-SESTA.

Texas Bill Aims to Ban Sex Toys at 'Big-Box' Retailers

Republican State Representative Hillary Hickland has introduced a bill in the Texas legislature that would restrict the sale of pleasure products at "big-box" and other non-adult retailers.

U.S. Solicitor General to Participate in FSC v Paxton

The Supreme Court on Monday granted a motion by the U.S. solicitor general to participate in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the case challenging Texas’ controversial age verification law.

Judge Pauses Lawsuit Over Indiana AV Law

A U.S. district court judge has paused a lawsuit over Indiana’s age verification law, pending the Supreme Court's ruling in the Free Speech Coalition-led challenge to Texas’ age verification law, HB 1181.

ASACP Urges Compliance With UK Online Safety Act

LOS ANGELES — The Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) has issued a statement advising adult companies to prepare to comply with the age assurance provisions of the U.K.'s Online Safety Act, which go into effect in 2025.

Pornhub Rejects Claim It Plans to 'Avoid' Age Verification in UK

Pornhub parent company Aylo told XBIZ on Monday that a recent report claiming the site will use a “loophole” to sidestep age verification requirements under the U.K.’s Online Safety Act is “misleading,” and that the company will always ensure its sites are compliant.

FSC Sues Tennessee Over AV Law, Seeks Preliminary Injunction

Free Speech Coalition, along with a group of adult industry stakeholders, has filed a legal challenge to Tennessee’s age verification law and requested an expedited preliminary injunction against enforcement.

Satisfyer Helps Dutch Police Dismantle Counterfeit Network

Satisfyer has teamed up with Dutch authorities to help dismantle a counterfeit network that sold fake products online, including items purporting to be the brand's Pro 2 and Penguin vibrators.

Indiana, Ohio AGs File Amicus Brief in Support of Texas AV Law

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, along with Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and officials from 22 other states, on Friday filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law.

Show More