More Fallout From U.S. Attorney Dismissals, DOJ Oversaw Sale of Obscene Materials

WASHINGTON — Reasons surrounding the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys last year may still remain unclear as the House Judiciary Committee continues to investigate, but court documents reveal that one of the ousted prosecutors, Arizona U.S Attorney Paul Charlton, may have been put on the chopping block because of the JM Productions obscenity trial.

In an ironic twist of fate, the U.S. government may have supervised the sale of the four adult titles now at issue in the JM Productions obscenity trial, according to court documents.

In an Aug. 31 motion to dismiss the obscenity charges against Christopher Ankeney and Five Star Video, attorney Richard Hertzberg argued that the government had overseen the sale of the videos in question — “Filthy Things 6,” “Gag Factor 15,” “Gag Factor 18” and “American Bukkake 13.”

According to court documents, the government’s involvement in the sale of the indicted JM videos began some years earlier when another Arizona retailer, The Castle Megastore corporation, filed for bankruptcy.

Under the terms of the bankruptcy settlement, the U.S. Trustee’s Office of the Justice Department administered Castle’s business while it attempted to pay off its creditors. During that time, the U.S. government appointed Vern Schweigert and Mark Franks to run the day-to-day operations of the company. Between 2003 and 2006, Castle stores throughout Arizona sold more than 100 copies of the four indicted titles, according to court papers.

In the motion to dismiss, Hertzberg argued that the U.S. government, which oversaw Castle’s business, was estopped — barred — from bringing an obscenity charge against his client, Five Star, because it had in fact approved the sale the indicted materials.

“The court should dismiss this case because the government itself has acquiesced in a community standard that permits sale of the indicted materials,” Hertzberg wrote.

Hertzberg declined to comment to XBIZ on the case or the politics surrounding Charlton’s dismissal, saying only that the former was an ongoing criminal matter.

Free Speech Coalition Board Chairman Jeffrey Douglas told XBIZ the government’s position in the case against JM and Five Star is embarrassing and hypocritical.

“It is bizarre beyond belief that the federal government is engaging in the same behavior that they themselves are indicting others for engaging in on a much smaller scale,” Douglas said.

Less than a month after Herzberg’s motion to dismiss, Brent Ward, who heads Justice’s obscenity task force, emailed Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, to raise concerns about Charlton and another U.S. attorney, Dan Bogden, with respect to obscenity prosecutions in their districts.

“We have two U.S. attorneys who are unwilling to take good cases we have presented to them,” Ward wrote. “They are Paul Charlton in Phoenix (this is urgent) and Dan Bogden in Las Vegas. In light of the AG's [Attorney General's] comments at the NAC to 'kick butt and take names,’ what do you suggest I do? Do you think at this point that these names should go through channels to reach the AG, or is it enough for me to give the names to you? If you want to act on what I give you, I will be glad to provide a little more context for each of the two situations.”

In Charlton’s case, the emphasis that the matter was urgent suggests that officials in Washington were referring to the only obscenity trial in Arizona — the JM/Five Star litigation.

Ann Harwood, Charlton’s second in command, told reporters that she knew of no other obscenity case in Arizona.

At the time, no case had been filed by Bogden in Nevada.

Whether officials at Justice pressed Charlton to go forward with a case that could have been a potential embarrassment to law enforcement in Arizona, given the federal government’s involvement in the Castle bankruptcy, or whether Charlton balked at such a proposition is unknown. However, Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich., has vowed to find out why eight U.S. attorneys, including Charlton and Bogden, were dismissed.

“We will get to the bottom of this crisis in our Justice Department with or without cooperation,” he said. “The U.S. attorneys are entrusted with tremendous power in our criminal justice system. Using the U.S. attorneys as political pawns undermines their critical work in fighting terrorism and risks subjecting the power of the prosecutor to partisan whims.”

One known element in the Charlton saga is Washington’s schizophrenic characterization of his suitability to hold the office of U.S. attorney. At times he was rated highly by the administration, while at other times his name appeared on memos of U.S. attorneys to be fired.

White House Counsel and former U.S. Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers, who headed the Bush Administration’s review of the U.S. attorneys to be dismissed, vacillated on Charlton. His name was not on the original March 2, 2005 list of attorneys to be dismissed, nor did Sampson originally include Charlton in a Jan. 1, 2006 memo regarding the same issue. Charlton’s name does appear on a Feb. 10, 2006 memo on the same subject, but an April 14 memo from Sampson does not list Charlton as an attorney to be dismissed.

The case against JM and Five Star remains a pending matter in the U.S. District Court for Arizona. No trial date has been set.

At the same time Conyers released his documents from his investigation to the press, Gonzales announced that Sampson, who orchestrated what Conyers called a purge, had resigned.

While it is not uncommon for U.S. Presidents to replace all U.S. attorneys, doing so midterm is an unusual step.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Project 2025 Leader Claims Big Tech Companies 'Deliberately Fuel Pornography Addiction' Among Men

Heritage Foundation president and Project 2025 leader Kevin Roberts published on Wednesday the text of a speech in which he persists with his past claim that “predatory Big Tech corporations” are “deliberately fueling pornography addiction” among young men.

FSC Petitions 10th Circuit for Review of Utah AV Dismissal

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) on Wednesday petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit to review a decision handed down earlier this month by a three-judge panel of the same appeals court, which denied FSC the right to challenge Utah’s controversial age verification law by suing state officials.

MyAdultAttorney's Corey D. Silverstein to Hold Post-Election Legal Impact Webinar

Industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein will hold a “Legal Impact” webinar titled “We Have a New U.S. President: Legal and Community Implications” on Nov. 12 at 1 p.m. PST.

Pornhub Shuts Down Access in Oklahoma Over Age Verification

Aylo began geo-blocking Pornhub across Oklahoma on Tuesday, three days in advance of the state’s new age verification law, SB 1959, taking effect.

Florida Age Verification Law Faces Legal Challenge

Tech industry trade groups NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) filed a lawsuit Monday challenging Florida’s HB 3, which includes a requirement for adult websites to verify the age of site visitors in the state.

Scotland Pushes Partnership With Anti-Porn Activist Who Thinks Sex Workers Are 'Possessed by the Devil'

A leading sex worker advocacy group in the U.K. reports that the Scottish government has instructed local authorities to partner with controversial English charity Azalea, led by a religious anti-porn activist who has stated that sex workers are “possessed by demons.”

#HandsOffMyPorn Campaign Ramps Up Anti-Project 2025 Ads on Barstool Sports, Similar Sites

The digital ad campaign #HandsOffMyPorn will up its spend from $200,000 to $500,000, and run all-new pre-roll spots on male-centric websites like Barstool Sports, GQ, Men's Health and Bleacher Report.

'Daily Caller' Column Condemns 'e-Harlots,' Urges 'Nuking' Porn Sites

In a column published Friday, the Tucker Carlson-founded right-wing news site Daily Caller advocates censorship of adult content, referring to adult creators in extremely derogatory terms and advocating for “nuking” porn sites to effect a “complete and total shutdown.”

UK Government Survey Reveals Online Safety Act Could Make Porn Sites 'Not Feasible' in the Country

The U.K. government released on Wednesday a new report assessing the likely impact of implementing the provisions of the controversial Online Safety Act (OSA), revealing adult industry concerns that a standalone provision directly targeting porn sites will render their operation in the U.K. “not feasible.”

'European Conservative' Editor Urges Total Porn Ban

One of Europe’s leading right-wing publications, the European Conservative, published an editorial this week claiming that “anti-porn activists have essentially won the public argument that pornography is poisoning our society” and calling for a total porn ban.

Show More