Appeals Court Won't Rehear Copyright Case Over DMCA Takedowns

Appeals Court Won't Rehear Copyright Case Over DMCA Takedowns

SAN FRANCISCO — The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday declined to rehear the so-called “dancing baby” case but made some amendments to its ruling on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s notice-and-takedown system.

The panel’s September ruling was the first time ever an appellate court held that “fair use” should be treated as a necessary consideration when copyright holders send takedown demands.  

Fair use permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders. It is one type of legal defense, called an affirmative defense, to the exclusive rights granted to the author of a creative work by copyright law.

Today’s amended appellate ruling left the original decision intact for the most part. But the new decision tossed out language on how automation might be used to evaluate fair use on a mass scale.

The 9th Circuit’s amended opinion excised several pages of its original ruling that said content owners’ fair use analysis need not be "searching or intensive” and that they could use automation through computer algorithms to help conduct the analysis.

In the September ruling, a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit affirmed a lower court’s decision for summary judgment in an action under the DMCA alleging that Universal Music Group violated 17 U.S.C. § 512(f) by misrepresenting in a takedown notification that plaintiff Stephanie Lenz’s home video of her “dancing baby” constituted an infringing use of a portion of a Prince composition, "Let's Go Crazy."

In 2007, Universal sent a takedown notice to YouTube, claiming Lenz didn't have permission to use the song and YouTube removed her video.

Lenz later successfully petitioned YouTube to restore the 29-second video and then sued Universal, stating the company failed to properly review the home video before submitting the takedown notice.

The appeals court said in the September decision that copyright owners like Universal can only send takedown notices if they’ve come to a good faith conclusion that the targeted upload is not a protected fair use of the copyrighted work.

As a result, Universal must stand trial over whether it wrongfully sent a copyright takedown notice to her.

Adult industry attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group told XBIZ that the amended decision released today was a mixed bag.

“I like that it makes it clear that fair use is a right, not an affirmative defense,” Randazza said. “At the same time, I find it sort of lame that they still leave the burden of proof of fair use on the fair user.”  

View today's amended ruling

Related:  

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Kiiroo, Pineapple Support Launch 'Empower Hour' Series on FeelHubX YouTube Channel

Kiiroo and Pineapple Support have teamed up to launch the “Empower Hour” series on the FeelHubX YouTube channel.

Kansas Law Firm Deploys Religion, Bunk Science While Recruiting Plaintiffs Under AV Law

Kansas-based personal injury law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley is promoting debunked scientific theories and leveraging religious affiliation against the industry while it seeks potential plaintiffs for lawsuits against adult companies under the state’s age verification law.

UK Tech Secretary Lists Age Verification Among OSA Priorities

Peter Kyle, the U.K.’s Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, on Wednesday made public a draft version of his priorities for implementing the Online Safety Act (OSA), including age verification.

AEBN Publishes Popular Seraches by Country for September, October

AEBN has released its list of popular searches from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Avery Jane Featured on 'Adult Time Podcast'

Avery Jane is the latest guest on the “Adult Time Podcast,” hosted by studio CCO Bree Mills.

FSC: Kansas Law Firm Threatens Adult Site Over Age Verification

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has been notified that Kansas law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley has sent a letter threatening an adult website with a lawsuit for breaking the state's age verification law.

10th Circuit Rejects Final FSC Appeal in Utah AV Case

The United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit on Monday rejected a motion by Free Speech Coalition (FSC) requesting that the full court rehear its appeal in Free Speech Coalition v. Anderson, the industry trade association’s challenge to Utah’s age verification law.

Trump Nominates Project 2025 Contributor, Section 230 Foe to Chair FCC

President-elect Donald Trump has nominated, as his pick to head the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr — an author of Project 2025 who has called for gutting Section 230 protections.

Streamate's Elevate Partners With Miss Mei on Decriminalization Initiative

Streamate’s Elevate initiative is debuting a November collaboration with creator and community advocate Miss Mei that will highlight the modern criminalization of sex work.

RedGIFs Launches New Mobile App

RedGIFs has launched a new mobile app designed to offer users a smoother, faster browsing experience.

Show More