Trademark Appeals Case Ends With New Standard in 5th Circuit

Trademark Appeals Case Ends With New Standard in 5th Circuit

NEW ORLEANS — The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today handed another victory to industry attorney D. Gill Sperlein and a client involved in the defense of a trademark infringement claim filed by a so-called AIDS denialist (the plantiff believes HIV does not cause AIDS).

Last month, the 5th Circuit shot down an appeal made over alleged infringement, ruling for the defendant, and today the court reversed and remanded the case to the lower court over attorneys fees.

The case involves plaintiff Clark Baker, who owns a trademark for his “HIV Innocence Group,” an organization that said it helps to defend people “who were wrongly accused of exposing others" to HIV.

Jeffrey DeShong, an HIV activist, set up HIVInnocenceGroupTruth.com to publish highly critical information about Baker and his group.

Baker sued in July 2013, accusing DeShong both of infringing his trademark and of defamation.

But a federal judge dismissed the trademark claims, ruling Baker had “failed to raise an inference that any reasonable person could confuse the content of DeShong's website” with his trademarked HIV Innocence Group.

Baker appealed the decision over infringement, as well as who should pay attorneys fees, losing both rounds.

Sperlein told XBIZ this afternoon that, in effect, “this ruling will deter others from trying to silence critics by bringing bogus trademark claims … and that is something I am proud to be a part of.”

“[I]t was no surprise when a Texas district court dismissed a case in which AIDS denialist Clark Baker and his organization, the Office of Military and Scientific Justice (OMSJ), sued Jeffrey DeShong for using the company’s trademark on a website criticizing Baker and his organization,” Sperlein said in a release today. “Although the lawyer should have known this was a frivolous claim, the judge was reluctant to go one step further and order an award of attorneys fees against Baker and OMSJ. Today, in Baker v. Deshong, the 5th Circuit ruled that the district court got it wrong.

“Under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) of the Lanham Act, a court should award attorneys’ fees to the prevailing party in an 'exceptional' case.  The issue on appeal, involved how to determine if a case is ‘exceptional.’” 

Under the new standard, Sperlein said, “an exceptional case is one where in considering both governing law and the facts of the case, the case stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position, or  the unsuccessful party has litigated the case in an ‘unreasonable manner.’” 

Sperlein noted that other federal circuit courts — namely the 3rd and 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals — have already adopted the standard.

Sperlein said that today’s ruling should likely have a significant impact on speech. 

“First, lawyers will be much more reluctant to bring a bogus trademark claim, just because they don’t like what a critic has to say,” Sperlein said. “They will have to decide if they can prove an alternative claim, such as defamation.  However, those claims are not often any more attractive to potential plaintiffs since the First Amendment and state anti-SLAPP laws offer significant protections to individuals who engage in public criticism. 

“Nonetheless, arrogant plaintiffs will continue to bring bogus trademark claims.  Therefore, the second effect the case will have may be more important.  With a more lenient standard for awarding attorney fees, defendants who have been unfairly sued will have an easier time in locating counsel willing to defend them on a pro bono basis, knowing that they have a good chance of obtaining an award for the fees the lawyer would normally charge.”

Sperlein, on a winning note, however, said that today’s victory was a financially hollow one.

“Because the defendant here has applied for bankruptcy, I don’t see a likelihood of collecting,” he told XBIZ.   

View today's ruling

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Adult Industry Educational, Networking Platform 'Imperfectly You' Launches

Imperfectly You, an educational and networking platform for adult industry workers, has officially launched.

Segpay to Launch News Network for High-Risk Merchants

Segpay has announced that it will launch the Segpay News Network (SNN) on April 15.

Age Verification Watch: Patching the Holes

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Pineapple Support to Host Autism Spectrum Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group for performers and creators who are, or suspect they may be, on the autism spectrum.

ImLive Launches Revamped Member Loyalty Program

Cam platform ImLive has revamped its member loyalty program.

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Show More