File-sharing Lawsuits in 2016 Take Nosedive, Researchers Say

File-sharing Lawsuits in 2016 Take Nosedive, Researchers Say

SAN FRANCISCO — File-sharing litigation appears to have been a “short-lived trend,” according to Lex Machina, a legal research firm operated by Lexis-Nexis.

Lex Machina said that the number of copyright lawsuits in the U.S. over file-sharing have dropped significantly this year — by more than half.

“In the second quarter of 2016, the drop off in the number of new file-sharing cases sharply accelerated, decreasing more than 50 percent over the first quarter (517 cases to 249 cases in the second quarter),” the research firm said.

“This suggests that file-sharing litigation, which had represented the majority of copyright litigation from the fourth quarter in 2014 through the fourth quarter in 2015, may have been a short-lived trend.”

Lex Machina defines file-sharing lawsuits as cases having "John Doe” defendants and accusations based on file-sharing technology such as BitTorrent.

In the past six years, most of the file-sharing suits have been filed by adult copyright holders in typical fashion: They would file complaints against Does and used early discovery mechanisms to determine the identities of the persons it alleged illegally downloaded films.

One in particular — Malibu Media, which operates X-art.com — has filed more than 4,300 infringement lawsuits in federal courts against those who illegally downloaded its films.

But X-art.com’s infringement numbers suddenly stopped. Since April 1, the adult company hasn’t filed any suits against alleged infringers.

Instead, the adult company is currently embroiled in a legal standoff with its former general counsel Keith Lipscomb and his Florida law firm, Lipscomb, Eisenberg & Baker.

X-art.com’s partnership with Lipscomb began to unravel after his firm stopped distributing funds to X-art.com owners Brigham Field and Collette Pelissier Field. In April, Lipscomb said the copyright operation was "winding down" because it was no longer profitable.  

X-art recently filed suit against Lipscomb and his firm in Los Angeles, while Lipscomb has filed his own suit against the adult company at Florida state court.

Another mass copyright infringement filer was the Prenda Law firm, which would set up a number of shell companies that purchased copyrights to adult videos and then seek judicial approval for early discovery mechanisms.

The shell companies would then mail letters threatening to sue unless the individual paid about $4,000 to “settle” the case.

By misusing the subpoena power of the court, a federal appeals court recently said, Prenda Law made millions of dollars from suing thousands of Does across the country.

The Prenda Law firm, no longer in business, dissolved in spectacular fashion and was forced later to defend itself against several sanction awards, which were upheld on appeal.

Things didn’t get better for the three controlling Prenda Law principals. Paul Hansmeier agreed to suspend his law license in Minnesota and is going through bankruptcy proceedings, John Steele faces disciplinary charges in Illinois and Paul Duffy died from heart and alcohol-related conditions. 

Prenda Law's surviving former members continue to be the subject of a federal probe over their trolling operation.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More