2257 Judge Delivers Big Win in Final Judgment, Decree

2257 Judge Delivers Big Win in Final Judgment, Decree

PHILADELPHIA — U.S. District Judge Michael Baylson today issued his final judgment and decree over the Free Speech Coalition’s First Amendment challenges over federal recordkeeping regulations for adult producers, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2257 and 2257A.

The ruling looked at “facial overbreath” challenges, which check to see if a law is overly broad, as well as “as-applied” claims made in the case over the statutes and its implementing regulations.

Baylson entered favorable judgment over the facial overbreath claims to the Justice Department.

However, with the FSC’s as-applied claims, the court said that the statutes and regulations should not apply to secondary producers, because they are unconstitutional.

As a result, Baylson permanently enjoined the Justice Department from enforcing the statutes as applied to secondary producers.

Under the ruling, primary producers can still be held liable under 2257 if they fail to check performers' identification documents and fail to verify their ages.

But Baylson also wrote that certain record-keeping requirements, labeling requirements and penalties under §§ 2257 and 2257A also were found to be unconstitutional.

Today’s final judgment and decree was a major win for the Free Speech Coalition, which along with other plaintiffs, waged and won First and Fourth Amendment claims over the statutes and accompanying regulations.

Baylson, in conclusion, said that there were a number of independent reasons, the court decided to grant the form of relief as requested by the plaintiffs. 

"In the first place, this is not a single plaintiff case. In some of the cases the defendant relies on, there have been only one or a few plaintiffs, and the facts alleged are common to all plaintiffs," Baylson wrote. "Here, there are numerous plaintiffs, representing many different aspects of the adult pornography industry. 

"The plaintiffs could have, and perhaps should have, brought the case as a class action, but the absence of a class does not, as a matter of law, limit the court’s ability in issuing a final decree that is fair to the parties and represents the legal reasoning as set forth by this court in several existing opinions, and in several opinions by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals," he wrote.

"This entire litigation was supported by many different plaintiffs involved in basically all aspects of the adult pornography industry. The plaintiffs include producers, performers, artists, promotors – and the trial testimony disclosed their activities in significant detail. 

"Thus, the court’s decision, holding at least some aspects of the statutes and regulations, invalid under the First Amendment, considered, in practical effect, a trial record concerning all aspects of the adult pornography industry.  Indeed, in the recent recorded telephone conference with counsel, government counsel could not detail any aspect of the adult pornography industry that would be unaffected by this court’s ruling, and still be subject to valid and constitutional enforcement of all aspects of the statutes in the future. 

"In addition, the 3rd Circuit has already struck down one aspect of the statute as unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, and although it did not enter a final judgment, the clear import of the 3rd Circuit’s ruling was that the government could not enforce the search-and-seizure provisions of the statute against anyone, not just the individual plaintiffs.  

"This case has been pending for almost nine years, with several 3rd Circuit decisions. Several aspects of the statute are still binding on the adult pornography industry, as reflected in the ... judgment, where the court declined to award relief.

"This court concludes, in its discretion, that there is no longer a strict dividing line between the relief that would be proper when a statute is facially unconstitutional, as opposed to a statute being declared unconstitutional as applied.”  

The Justice Department is expected to appeal today’s decision.

“Each party is to bear its own costs,” Baylson ordered.

The FSC is expected to issue a statement about the judgment and decree on Tuesday.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Penny Barber: The Fit Mommy Domme Reveals Her Auteur Side

When Penny Barber took home the 2025 XMAs trophy for MILF Performer of the Year, she was 39 — but she’d already been telling people she was a MILF for almost 20 years.

Summer Starz Makes Her WIFEY Debut

Creator Summer Starz has made her debut for Vixen Media Group (VMG) studio imprint WIFEY alongside her husband Dean Darkhole and Sheem.

Jewelz Blu Stars in Latest From Ricky's Room

Jewelz Blu stars with Mazee the Goat and site honcho Ricky Johnson in the latest release from Ricky’s Room, titled “Two Inside Of Jewelz Blu.”

Adult Time Releases New Installment of 'MILF Overload'

Adult Time has released the latest installment of director Jim Powers' series "MILF Overload."

Choice Talent Management Launches Fan Platform 'ChoiceFilmz'

Choice Talent Management CEO Chris Crisco has launched a new fan platform called ChoiceFilmz.

Dredd to Launch Official Site

Dredd has announced his new website OfficialDreddXXX.com, launching April 20.

River Lynn Toplines Pat Myne's 'Phat Ass for Days'

River Lynn headlines director Pat Myne's latest release, "Phat Ass for Days," from Evil Angel.

Kitana Lure, Angelika Grays Star in Latest From MixedX

Kitana Lure and Angelika Grays star in the latest release from MixedX, titled “The Power of Lust.”

Jessie Rogers Fronts Latest From Blacked

Jessie Rogers has made her debut for Vixen Media Group (VMG) studio imprint Blacked, alongside Damion Dayski.

Penny Barber Makes Her Slayed Debut

Reigning XMAs MILF Performer of the Year Penny Barber has made her debut for Vixen Media Group studio imprint Slayed, alongside Phoenix Marie.

Show More