Supreme Court Ruling Upholds Right to Register 'Immoral,' 'Scandalous' Trademarks

Supreme Court Ruling Upholds Right to Register 'Immoral,' 'Scandalous' Trademarks

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Supreme Court struck down today a federal law provision banning the registration of "immoral" or "scandalous" trademarks, calling it an infringement of the First Amendment, but Judge Alito called for Congress to legislate more explicitly against what he considers "vulgar" terms.

“The justices' ruling clears the way for a clothing designer to apply for a federal trademark for his clothing line called FUCT,” CNN reported.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote the majority opinion. The ruling was unanimous in part and 6-3 in part. Kagan was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch in full, while Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor dissented in part.

"We hold that this provision infringes the First Amendment," Kagan wrote, because it "disfavors certain ideas."

The ruling, according to CNN, “could open the doors to more requests to register words or phrases that have been considered vulgar, a concern that the court's minority feared.”

Justice Alito, however, suggested Congress should legislate to more explicitly prevent people from trademarking “vulgar terms,” which he apparently thinks do not play real part in ideological debates.

For the Conservative Justice, nominated by George W. Bush in 2006, Congress should define “vulgar terms” as words that “further coarsen our popular culture.”

FUCT owner, Erik Brunetti, named his brand in 1990 allegedly “to question authority.” Brunetti claims the made-up word, homophone for “fucked,” is actually an acronym for “FRIENDS U CAN'T TRUST."

Brunetti attempted to register his trademark in 2011, but the United States Patent and Trademark Office refused him.

The Patent Office, according to the CNN report, told Brunnetti that FUCT was “the ‘phonetic equivalent’ of the past tense of a vulgar word, and determined that federal law prohibits the registration of trademarks that consist of ‘scandalous’ subject matter.”

"This decision represents a significant victory for First Amendment rights, and will provide broad opportunity for adult businesses that use explicit brand names," Lawrence G. Walters, First Amendment attorney and owner of Walters Law Group told XBIZ. "Some of our clients have been waiting for this decision for many years. The idea that the USPTO could deny trademark registration based on a moral viewpoint has always conflicted with free speech rights. This case finally puts any doubt about that issue to rest."

"The opinion itself," Walters continued "is important for First Amendment jurisprudence going forward, particularly in viewpoint discrimination cases. As Justice Alito said, 'viewpoint discrimination is poison to a free society.' The Court made clear that the First Amendment will not tolerate government censorship based on viewpoint."

The Supreme Court Justices were more concerned with the wording of the federal law, which could be interpreted as preventing “the expression of ideas.”

Kagan’s opinion stressed that the law "does not draw the line at lewd, sexually explicit, or profane marks,” but could be applied to "the universe of immoral or scandalous" material. "A law disfavoring 'ideas that offend' discriminates based on viewpoint, in violation of the First Amendment," wrote Kagan.

According to CNN, the partial dissent, by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Sotomayor, “would have saved part of the statute that prohibits ‘scandalous’ trademarks. Breyer said he would do so because "these attention-grabbing words" may lead "to the creation of public spaces that many will find repellant, perhaps on occasion creating the risk of verbal altercations or even physical confrontations."

"Just think about how you might react if you saw someone wearing a t-shirt or using a product emblazoned with an odious racial epithet,” Breyer wrote.

Related:  

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Kiiroo, Pineapple Support Launch 'Empower Hour' Series on FeelHubX YouTube Channel

Kiiroo and Pineapple Support have teamed up to launch the “Empower Hour” series on the FeelHubX YouTube channel.

Cherry Kiss Toplines Pat Myne's 'Anal Fetish Babes'

Cherry Kiss headlines director Pat Myne’s “Anal Fetish Babes,” from Evil Angel.

Kansas Law Firm Deploys Religion, Bunk Science While Recruiting Plaintiffs Under AV Law

Kansas-based personal injury law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley is promoting debunked scientific theories and leveraging religious affiliation against the industry while it seeks potential plaintiffs for lawsuits against adult companies under the state’s age verification law.

UK Tech Secretary Lists Age Verification Among OSA Priorities

Peter Kyle, the U.K.’s Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, on Wednesday made public a draft version of his priorities for implementing the Online Safety Act (OSA), including age verification.

Nicole Aria Stars in Latest From Jules Jordan

Nicole Aria stars with John Strong and Zac Wild in the latest release from Jules Jordan.

Ellie Nova Is Hustler's 'Cover Honey' for December

Ellie Nova is the Cover Honey for the December issue of Hustler Magazine, appearing in a 14-page centerfold spread shot by ThisYearsModel.com.

Leah Gotti, Hazel Paige Topline 'Lesbian Neighbor Affairs 2'

Leah Gotti and Hazel Paige headline “Lesbian Neighbor Affairs 2,” from Girlfriends Films.

Mandy Muse Stars in Latest From New Sensations

Mandy Muse stars with Danny Mountain in the latest release from New Sensations, titled “Anal Time is Of the Essence For Mandy Muse.”

Orion Debuts 'Suck-O-Mat 3' Masturbator

Orion Wholesale has introduced the third edition of its Suck-O-Mat masturbator.

Biird Debuts 'Ohwii' Glass Dildo

Biird has introduced Ohwii, its new double-ended glass dildo.

Show More