AB5 Update: Judge Declines to Rule Uber Drivers Are Employees

AB5 Update: Judge Declines to Rule Uber Drivers Are Employees

LOS ANGELES — The newest data point in XBIZ’s ongoing coverage of California’s AB5 initiative comes from U.S. District Judge Edward Chen, who has declined to compel Uber to reclassify its drivers in California as employees.

Courthouse News Service has reported that the move seems to come down to a discrepancy over whether a sought-after injunction should be treated as being public or private — and is likely to not be the last word on Uber’s driver classification.

It is a saga studied by the industry as it seeks to steer clear of liability while continuing to make use of independent contractors, ranging from performers to programmers, cammers to consultants and everything in between who live in California or provide services to California businesses.

Uber plans to continue classifying drivers as contractors, claiming they are not employees under California’s “ABC Test” and is fighting to overturn the law. If it cannot win, Uber may be liable for drivers' job expenses, including gas, insurance, maintenance and phone plans.

On the flip side, the law’s supporters claim that many employees are mislabeled as contractors to save their employers money on taxes and benefits while depriving these workers of their rights under state law, such as a minimum wage, plus overtime and sick pay, workers’ compensation insurance and more.

Labor rights attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan believes that worker misclassification is “a significant factor in the erosion of the middle class and the rise in income inequality.”

“While the court declined to grant our request for injunctive relief on a preliminary basis, the court left open the possibility that we may obtain injunctive relief on a permanent basis later in the case,” Liss-Riordan told Courthouse News Service. “So, we look forward to proceeding with the case and at last requiring Uber to comply with California law and stop depriving its drivers of their basic rights under the California Labor Code.”

Stay tuned to XBIZ for the newest updates on AB5 and what it means for the future of your business.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

ImLive Launches Revamped Member Loyalty Program

Cam platform ImLive has revamped its member loyalty program.

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Creator Networking App 'Plaiir' Launches

Plaiir, a mobile networking app for creators, has officially launched.

Swedish Court Rules LELO Products Do Not Infringe 'Invalid' Satisfyer Patent

A Swedish district court has ruled that a patent filed by Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH is not valid, and therefore three products from pleasure brand LELO are not in violation.

Show More