Supreme Court Could Rule on Whether 'Revenge Porn' Is Protected Speech

Supreme Court Could Rule on Whether 'Revenge Porn' Is Protected Speech

LOS ANGELES — The United States Supreme Court may soon rule on the constitutionality of revenge porn law.

In a Washington Post article published yesterday, the case of Bethany Austin was discussed. Austin, an Illinois resident, was charged with the felony of "nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images" by an Illinois court. She had discovered her fiance had cheated on her, and after the fiance attempted to paint her as "crazy," she sent both of their families four pages of text messages between her fiance and his lover. The pages also included nude pictures of the woman the fiance had been cheating with.

Austin challenged the ruling on the grounds that Illinois' revenge porn law was an unconstitutional restriction of her freedom of speech. 

Two years after being charged, the original trial court dismissed the charge against Austin. The Illinois Supreme Court, however, reversed the ruling, and the charge was reinstated. In a 5-2 ruling, the court decided that the law meant to protect the privacy of the victim could not be constitutionally protected free speech.

"Viewed as a privacy regulation, [the law] is similar to laws prohibiting the unauthorized disclosure of other forms of private information, such as medical records, biometric data or Social Security numbers," the higher court said in its ruling. "The entire field of privacy law is based on the recognition that some types of information are more sensitive than others, the disclosure of which can and should be regulated."

Austin's attorney, Igor Bozic, has asked for a stay on the Illinois Supreme Court ruling while he files a petition for a writ of certiorari at the U.S. Supreme Court. 

"It covers the woman who reacts to an unwanted sexual text message by showing a friend," Bozic wrote. "It covers the woman who tries to deter that toxic behavior by forwarding the unsolicited image to the sender’s mother or girlfriend… And, of course, it gives controlling men — like Bethany Austin’s ex-fiancé — yet another legal tool for victimizing their intimate partners."

The Post spoke with Northwestern University law professor Andrew Koppelman, who wrote a law review article on the constitutionality of revenge porn laws which have now been passed in 46 states and the District of Columbia. He said that because the Illinois statute specifically mentions that the law is broken when the person disseminating the images knows that the person photographed did not give consent, it's not protected speech.

"There’s no good reason to construe free speech to protect malicious people who want to hurt people unless there’s no way to draw a line," Koppelman said. "The Illinois statute shows there is a sensible way to draw a line."

Image: US Bureau of Land Management

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More