Instagram, Facebook Moderation Now Regulated by Self-Appointed 'Oversight Board'

Instagram, Facebook Moderation Now Regulated by Self-Appointed 'Oversight Board'

MENLO PARK, Calif. — Earlier this month, as the world was preoccupied with adapting to the new challenges of the post-COVID-19 reality, Facebook announced it had established an international entity named the "Oversight Board" to make decisions about free speech and content moderation on its platforms, which include Instagram.

This development directly affects adult performers and companies, all of whom have been targeted by Facebook/Instagram’s Term of Services (which bundle nudity and consensual sex with horrendous hate crimes and violent crimes), by its discretionary enforcement (celebrities and major brands are allowed nudity, as numerous examples attest), by search shadowbanning (which the companies deny they practice) and by a secretive internal culture regarding censorship decisions.

This Oversight Board — named simply that, not "Facebook's Oversight Board" — is funded by Facebook, who appointed its four co-chairs. Those co-chairs then appointed 20 members, with 20 more members to be appointed later.

Facebook spent $130 million setting up the Oversight Board trust, but claims the board is completely independent. Facebook also committed itself to abiding by the board's decisions.

The creation of this Oversight Board was announced on May 6 by Nick Clegg, VP of Global Affairs and Communications.

Clegg said that the announcement of this unprecedented board, essentially a self-appointed international censorship body deciding on the limits of free speech, marked "a fundamental change in the way some of the most difficult and significant decisions around content on our platforms will be made."

Clegg quoted Mark Zuckerberg’s decree that "Facebook should not make so many important decisions about free expression and safety on our own."

A Pseudo-Legalistic International 'Court'

Paraphrasing the Spider-Man comic, Clegg explained that “with our size comes a great deal of responsibility and while we have always taken advice from experts on how to best keep our platforms safe, until now, we have made the final decisions about what should be allowed on our platforms and what should be removed. And these decisions often are not easy to make — most judgments do not have obvious, or uncontroversial, outcomes and yet many of them have significant implications for free expression.”

This is how Clegg described the process: “Facebook helped kick off the member selection process by choosing four co-chairs, who have since been working with us to select the additional 16 members announced today. Membership selection will continue in this way until the board has selected up to 40 members, at which point it alone will take responsibility for selection of members in the future. The recommendation portal remains open for additional suggestions.”

“The members contract directly with the Oversight Board, are not Facebook employees, and cannot be removed by Facebook,” Clegg added.

Clegg’s statement added a strange, pseudo-legalistic “commitment” (which is, of course, not legally binding) giving this self-appointed board the appearance of a sort of “international court of appeals”:

Our Commitment

For our part, Facebook will implement the board’s decisions unless doing so could violate the law, and will respond constructively and in good faith to policy guidance put forth by the board.

The board won’t be able to hear every case we or the public might want it to hear, but we look forward to working with the board to ensure that its scope grows over time. As it does, we know the board will play an increasingly important role in setting precedent and direction for content policy at Facebook. And in the long term, we hope its impact extends well beyond Facebook, and serves as a springboard for similar approaches to content governance in the online sphere.

As always, we remain hugely grateful to everyone who has lent their time, energy, and expertise to this first-of-its-kind project.

The Oversight Board was also introduced through a New York Times op-ed, penned by the four co-chairs, ominously titled “We Are a New Board Overseeing Facebook. Here’s What We’ll Decide.”

News of the Oversight Board creation, conveniently shared during a time when public opinion was distracted by COVID-19, only resulted in muted reactions.

Some pushback came from some American right wing, conservative and religious voices concerned about the international nature of the body, its questionable allegiance to U.S. Constitution-based free speech issues and Facebook’s future policies regarding political messaging.

To visit the Oversight Board's website, click here.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More