Senate Commerce Committee Holds Hearing on PACT Act, Section 230

Senate Commerce Committee Holds Hearing on PACT Act, Section 230

WASHINGTON — This morning, the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, Innovation and the Internet held a lengthy hearing on Section 230, assessing the impact of what the committee calls “the law that helped create the internet” and examining proposed reforms to it, particularly the PACT Act.

The hearing began at 7 a.m. (PDT) and continued for almost three hours, chaired by Senator John Thune (R-South Dakota). Many of the senators and witnesses participated via videoconference due to COVID-19 Senate regulations.

The purpose of the hearing was to "examine the important role of Section 230 in promoting and disseminating speech online, and the history, evolution and expansion of Section 230’s protections for online platforms."

It also aimed to “provide an opportunity to discuss ways to ensure platforms are accountable for their content moderation practices and what legislative measures, from transparency to accountability tools, can empower consumers online.”

The experts who were called as witnesses by the Subcommittee included Olivier Sylvain, Professor of Law at Fordham University; Jeff Kosseff, Assistant Professor at the United States Naval Academy’s Cyber Science Department; and Elizabeth Banker, Deputy General Counsel of the Internet Association.

But the star witness was former Orange County Representative Christopher Cox, who was the main author of Section 230 in the mid-1990s. Cox is currently the director of trade association NetChoice.

Cox patiently answered a variety of questions posed by the senators concerning the original purpose and intent behind Section 230. The senators asked about a host of different matters, depending on their particular interests, related to Section 230 and platform liability.

Several GOP senators used the hearing to criticize what they called social media platforms’ “viewpoint censorship” of political opinions.

FOSTA-SESTA was also mentioned as the precedent for bipartisan legislation that had stripped liability protections from platforms in cases of human trafficking. The prosecution of the former owners of Backpage.com — deeply related to the FOSTA-SESTA debate, although predating its signing by a few days — was invoked as an example of judicial confusion around Section 230.

The PACT Act is one of several projects that aim to reform the liability protections of Section 230.

Although there were important disagreements about whether targeting Section 230 was the best way to update the law for the current state of the internet and, as Senator Thune put it, “novel situations where we would like to see justice served,” a consensus between the senators and the witnesses was that the continuing evolution of the internet, AI and algorithms deserves "continued discussion."

This PACT Act hearing also presented a clear, sobering counterpoint to the recent Judiciary Committee hearing chaired by Lindsey Graham to rally support of his EARN IT Act, which would impose onerous compliance regulations on online companies and establish a committee appointed by Attorney General William Barr to police online content.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More