California Ride-Hailing Ruling Could Affect Freelancer Status of Some Sex Workers

California Ride-Hailing Ruling Could Affect Freelancer Status of Some Sex Workers

SAN FRANCISCO — In a case which may have consequences for cam models and sex workers who rely on a single platform for a majority of their income, a judge ordered ride-hailing companies Uber and Lyft this afternoon to re-classify their California drivers from independent contractors to employees.

The ruling would make Uber and Lyft employers, and would mandate them to provide the newly classified employees with benefits, in accordance with the AB5 legislation that came into effect on January 1.

San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ethan Schulman, who issued the injunction, also paused it for 10 days to allow for an appeal. The ride-hailing companies are expected to appeal the judge’s preliminary injunction in favor of the State of California. If upheld, the ruling could, according to Bloomberg News, “make them halt their services as they figure out how to adjust their business model to comply with it.”

Judge Schulman agreed with California Attorney General Xavier Becerra that Uber and Lyft are violating AB5.

The legislation — currently undergoing a revision process in Sacramento via a follow-up “clean-up” bill outlining exceptions — states that “workers can generally only be considered contractors if they perform duties outside the usual course of a company’s business,” according to Bloomberg.

Today’s ruling may have an impact on California cam models and other sex workers, if the State, or the workers themselves, decide to argue that their performances constitute duties that are essential to “the usual work” of a camming platform, cam studio or premium platform’s business.

The case is California v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc., CGC-20-584402, at the California Superior Court (San Francisco).

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Creator Networking App 'Plaiir' Launches

Plaiir, a mobile networking app for creators, has officially launched.

Swedish Court Rules LELO Products Do Not Infringe 'Invalid' Satisfyer Patent

A Swedish district court has ruled that a patent filed by Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH is not valid, and therefore three products from pleasure brand LELO are not in violation.

North Dakota House Committee Questions Anti-Porn 'Public Health Hazard' Claim

The North Dakota House of Representatives Education Committee on Monday amended a resolution that would have recognized pornography as a “public health hazard,” instead replacing that language with a call for further study into whether such a designation is appropriate.

Show More