Backpage.com Trial: Defendants Ask Appeals Court to Remove Judge

Backpage.com Trial: Defendants Ask Appeals Court to Remove Judge

PHOENIX — Former Backpage owners Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday seeking an order to recuse the Phoenix federal judge presiding over their criminal trial.

In late September, as XBIZ reported, the defense requested that U.S. District Court in Arizona Judge Susan Brnovich recuse herself over public statements made by her husband, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a vocal activist against what he calls “human trafficking,” which includes a lurid pamphlet published by his office.

A month later, Judge Brnovich issued a ruling detailing her refusal to recuse herself from the case, denying the defendants' contention that evidence of her husband’s explicit activism against them as part of a crusade alleging “human trafficking” resulted in a conflict of interest and cast doubts on her impartiality.

Yesterday, Lacey and Jim Larkin filed a “petition for a writ of mandamus” with the Ninth Circuit, asking the higher court to intervene in what they see as a potential source of prejudice against them.

'Inaccurate Assumptions About Backpage'

The development was first reported today by news site FrontPageConfidential.com, which is published by Lacey and Larkin and edited by Stephen Lemons, and is the last journalistic remnant of their once-powerful company, Village Voice Media.

According to Lacey and Larkin’s mouthpiece, AG Mark Brnovich’s “inaccurate assumptions about Backpage go to the heart of the case and raise the specter of potential bias on behalf of the judge.”

“The petition argues that Arizona AG Brnovich ‘has interests that could be significantly affected by the outcome of the case,’ and that his statements and actions 'could cause reasonable people to question the court’s impartiality,'" FrontPageConfidential reported.

As they have since their initial recusal filing in September, Lacey and Larkin made much of AG Mark Brnovich’s tawdry “anti-trafficking” 2017 pamphlet “Human Trafficking: Arizona’s Not Buying It,” which features a cover portraying a stock photo of a very young woman wearing a skimpy top and leaning into the window of a car.

The sensationalistic 2017 pamphlet, still available as a government publication, wildly exaggerates the prevalence of what it calls “human trafficking” in Arizona, illustrates it with stock photography of young cis white women in peril that do not match any known statistics about actual human trafficking and repeatedly mentions Backpage.com — at the time of publication not yet shuttered by the FBI — as engaging in and central to “human trafficking.”

The pamphlet is so much presented as the thoughts of AG Brnovich that it even begins with an introduction titled “Letter From Mark” (sic) where the public servant — and husband of the federal judge in charge of Backpage’s prosecution — takes full ownership of the alarmist statements that follow.

The Issue of Prejudice

In yesterday’s filing, FrontPageConfidential reports, “the defense contends that AG Brnovich, others on his behalf and organizations with which he is associated with have vilified Backpage, assumed its complicity in sex trafficking and drawn conclusions about facts that will be at issue in the trial of Lacey, Larkin and their four co-defendants, which is scheduled to begin April 12, 2021, almost three years to the day after they were arrested by the FBI.”

According to Lacey and Larkin’s lawyers, the recusal “is required under 28 U.S. Code § 455, the federal law that states that any justice, judge or magistrate ‘shall disqualify [herself] in any proceeding in which [her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned’.”

Last month, Judge Susan Brnovich had convinced herself — writing in the third person — of her lack of bias to her own satisfaction, concluding in the formal refusal to recuse herself that Lacey and Larkin are now appealing that “the court will remain impartial in this matter, and no reasonable person fully informed of the facts would question the court’s impartiality based on the court’s marriage to AG Brnovich."

For more of XBIZ's coverage of the Backpage.com trial, click here.

Main Image: The Brnovichs, Arizona's legal power couple.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More