Backpage.com Trial: Defendants Ask Appeals Court to Remove Judge

Backpage.com Trial: Defendants Ask Appeals Court to Remove Judge

PHOENIX — Former Backpage owners Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday seeking an order to recuse the Phoenix federal judge presiding over their criminal trial.

In late September, as XBIZ reported, the defense requested that U.S. District Court in Arizona Judge Susan Brnovich recuse herself over public statements made by her husband, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a vocal activist against what he calls “human trafficking,” which includes a lurid pamphlet published by his office.

A month later, Judge Brnovich issued a ruling detailing her refusal to recuse herself from the case, denying the defendants' contention that evidence of her husband’s explicit activism against them as part of a crusade alleging “human trafficking” resulted in a conflict of interest and cast doubts on her impartiality.

Yesterday, Lacey and Jim Larkin filed a “petition for a writ of mandamus” with the Ninth Circuit, asking the higher court to intervene in what they see as a potential source of prejudice against them.

'Inaccurate Assumptions About Backpage'

The development was first reported today by news site FrontPageConfidential.com, which is published by Lacey and Larkin and edited by Stephen Lemons, and is the last journalistic remnant of their once-powerful company, Village Voice Media.

According to Lacey and Larkin’s mouthpiece, AG Mark Brnovich’s “inaccurate assumptions about Backpage go to the heart of the case and raise the specter of potential bias on behalf of the judge.”

“The petition argues that Arizona AG Brnovich ‘has interests that could be significantly affected by the outcome of the case,’ and that his statements and actions 'could cause reasonable people to question the court’s impartiality,'" FrontPageConfidential reported.

As they have since their initial recusal filing in September, Lacey and Larkin made much of AG Mark Brnovich’s tawdry “anti-trafficking” 2017 pamphlet “Human Trafficking: Arizona’s Not Buying It,” which features a cover portraying a stock photo of a very young woman wearing a skimpy top and leaning into the window of a car.

The sensationalistic 2017 pamphlet, still available as a government publication, wildly exaggerates the prevalence of what it calls “human trafficking” in Arizona, illustrates it with stock photography of young cis white women in peril that do not match any known statistics about actual human trafficking and repeatedly mentions Backpage.com — at the time of publication not yet shuttered by the FBI — as engaging in and central to “human trafficking.”

The pamphlet is so much presented as the thoughts of AG Brnovich that it even begins with an introduction titled “Letter From Mark” (sic) where the public servant — and husband of the federal judge in charge of Backpage’s prosecution — takes full ownership of the alarmist statements that follow.

The Issue of Prejudice

In yesterday’s filing, FrontPageConfidential reports, “the defense contends that AG Brnovich, others on his behalf and organizations with which he is associated with have vilified Backpage, assumed its complicity in sex trafficking and drawn conclusions about facts that will be at issue in the trial of Lacey, Larkin and their four co-defendants, which is scheduled to begin April 12, 2021, almost three years to the day after they were arrested by the FBI.”

According to Lacey and Larkin’s lawyers, the recusal “is required under 28 U.S. Code § 455, the federal law that states that any justice, judge or magistrate ‘shall disqualify [herself] in any proceeding in which [her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned’.”

Last month, Judge Susan Brnovich had convinced herself — writing in the third person — of her lack of bias to her own satisfaction, concluding in the formal refusal to recuse herself that Lacey and Larkin are now appealing that “the court will remain impartial in this matter, and no reasonable person fully informed of the facts would question the court’s impartiality based on the court’s marriage to AG Brnovich."

For more of XBIZ's coverage of the Backpage.com trial, click here.

Main Image: The Brnovichs, Arizona's legal power couple.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Braindance Unveils '6DOF' VR Tech

Interactive virtual reality platform Braindance has debuted its new Six Degrees of Freedom (6DOF) VR technology.

Kiiroo, Pineapple Support Launch 'Empower Hour' Series on FeelHubX YouTube Channel

Kiiroo and Pineapple Support have teamed up to launch the “Empower Hour” series on the FeelHubX YouTube channel.

Kansas Law Firm Deploys Religion, Bunk Science While Recruiting Plaintiffs Under AV Law

Kansas-based personal injury law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley is promoting debunked scientific theories and leveraging religious affiliation against the industry while it seeks potential plaintiffs for lawsuits against adult companies under the state’s age verification law.

UK Tech Secretary Lists Age Verification Among OSA Priorities

Peter Kyle, the U.K.’s Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, on Wednesday made public a draft version of his priorities for implementing the Online Safety Act (OSA), including age verification.

AEBN Publishes Popular Seraches by Country for September, October

AEBN has released its list of popular searches from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Avery Jane Featured on 'Adult Time Podcast'

Avery Jane is the latest guest on the “Adult Time Podcast,” hosted by studio CCO Bree Mills.

FSC: Kansas Law Firm Threatens Adult Site Over Age Verification

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has been notified that Kansas law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley has sent a letter threatening an adult website with a lawsuit for breaking the state's age verification law.

10th Circuit Rejects Final FSC Appeal in Utah AV Case

The United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit on Monday rejected a motion by Free Speech Coalition (FSC) requesting that the full court rehear its appeal in Free Speech Coalition v. Anderson, the industry trade association’s challenge to Utah’s age verification law.

Trump Nominates Project 2025 Contributor, Section 230 Foe to Chair FCC

President-elect Donald Trump has nominated, as his pick to head the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr — an author of Project 2025 who has called for gutting Section 230 protections.

Streamate's Elevate Partners With Miss Mei on Decriminalization Initiative

Streamate’s Elevate initiative is debuting a November collaboration with creator and community advocate Miss Mei that will highlight the modern criminalization of sex work.

Show More