MindGeek Lawyers Ask Alabama Judge to Uphold Section 230 Protections

MindGeek Lawyers Ask Alabama Judge to Uphold Section 230 Protections

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — MindGeek lawyers presented this week their first on-record Section 230 arguments in the current onslaught of liability lawsuits over third-party content uploaded onto Pornhub, part of the War on Porn-driven campaign that kicked off with Nicholas Kristof’s New York Times article in early December 2020.

Two anonymous women filed a class action suit against MindGeek in Alabama in February, “claiming that videos and images depicting their past sexual abuse were sold or distributed on websites owned and operated by MindGeek,” reported legal news site Law360.

The company urged the Alabama federal judge "to dismiss the proposed class action raised by two female survivors of childhood sex trafficking, arguing that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects the company from their suit since third parties made and posted the sexually explicit videos depicting the women, not Pornhub,” the report continued.

As neutral observers have expected since Exodus Cry, NCOSE and other religiously-inspired anti-porn groups began their ongoing campaign to twist existing legislation and precedent in order to make platforms liable for the actions of uploaders — something that, by design, Section 230 was explicitly written to prevent — MindGeek’s lawyers argued that “internet service companies (like the defendants) cannot be held liable as the publishers of user-generated content (like the videos of plaintiffs third parties made and uploaded). Thus, because plaintiffs seek to hold defendants liable for content posted to their websites, their claims are proscribed by Section 230.”

"The complaint does not connect any website features to the specific harm plaintiffs allegedly suffered," the MindGeek lawyers continued. "Moreover, courts have consistently found that the sorts of content management tools plaintiffs point to do not vitiate Section 230 immunity."

Labeling and Monetization

The company also argued that merely “labeling content to make it easier to find” does not invalidate Section 230 immunity, as the platforms are not the creators of the content.

As for the claim that Pornhub “monetized” illegal videos that might have slipped through their moderation systems — a claim that was at the core of Nicholas Kristof’s December 4 article and that originated in anti-porn propaganda by NCOSE and Exodus Cry — the MindGeek lawyers point out that “an allegation that defendants monetized their websites in general does not imply that those advertising revenues were received 'because of' trafficking by third parties. Nor do plaintiffs allege that defendants received any benefit whatsoever from their specific videos."

Law360 also reported that “Reddit asserted a similar Section 230 defense three weeks ago, telling a California federal judge that the statute protects it from a proposed class action accusing the website of actively profiting from child pornography.”

The case is Doe No. 1 et al. v. MG Freesites LTD et al., case number 7:21-cv-00220, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More