Facebook Asks 3rd Circuit to Review Decision in Complex Section 230 Case

Facebook Asks 3rd Circuit to Review Decision in Complex Section 230 Case

PHILADELPHIA — Facebook asked the full Third Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday to review last month’s split-panel decision allowing a complex intellectual property and “right of publicity” lawsuit — which challenges Section 230 protections over third-party content and also mentions adult conglomerate WGCZ as co-defendant — to move forward.

The lawsuit, known as Hepp v. Facebook, was originally filed by Philadelphia Fox 29 news anchor Karen Hepp in September 2019, a year after she was "told by coworkers that her photograph was making its way around the internet,” court documents indicate.

“The image depicts Hepp in a convenience store, smiling in the center of the frame’s foreground. But the photograph was taken without Hepp’s knowledge or consent. She knows neither the convenience store’s location nor how the image was posted online. And she never authorized the image to be used in online advertisements for erectile dysfunction and dating websites.”

Hepp’s lawsuit, the filing continues, “included two sets of posts featuring her photograph. She alleged each violated her right of publicity under Pennsylvania law.”

She “seeks to hold liable sites on which her image appeared without her consent on advertisements for a dating app and an erectile dysfunction treatment, and for promoting pornography,” legal news site Law360 reported last week.

Facebook: Decision Fosters 'Speech-Chilling Uncertainty'

Hepp is suing Facebook, Reddit, image-sharing platform Imgur and WGCZ, the European conglomerate behind XVideos, Penthouse and several other adult products and brands, including one of the websites mentioned in the suit.

Last month, a panel of Third Circuit judges reversed a lower court decision, authorizing Hepp’s lawsuit to move forward.

Facebook has now requested an “en banc” review of the panel’s decision, weighing in the opinions of the full Third Circuit.

Facebook, Law360 reported, “slammed the majority's decision for introducing ‘speech-chilling uncertainty’ and argued that it forces other courts to figure out if ‘state-law torts qualify as intellectual property laws.’”

"The majority decision now invites litigants to sidestep [Section 230] and its immunity by repackaging claims as state-law intellectual property claims," the Facebook attorneys argued. "Plaintiffs will have ample incentives to do so, and courts will have precious few tools to divine whether a state law is an intellectual property law or something else, because, unlike Congress, states have no reason to label their laws as such."

In August 2020, before Hepp appealed to the Third Circuit, a district court released WGCZ from the lawsuit, “siding with its argument that it had no longer owned or operated [the site in question] when Hepp sued in September 2019,” Law360 explained.

The cases are Hepp v. Facebook et al., case numbers 20-2725 and 20-2885, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Main Image: The dating site ad featuring Karen Hepp's image (Source: Hepp v. Facebook)

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More