Alabama Federal Judge Denies Section 230 Immunity to MindGeek, Claims Pornhub Is a Publisher

Alabama Federal Judge Denies Section 230 Immunity to MindGeek, Claims Pornhub Is a Publisher

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — An Alabama federal judge today shut down MindGeek’s petition to dismiss a class action lawsuit filed by Jane Does over content posted on Pornhub that allegedly depicts instances of their human trafficking, claiming that Section 230 protections over third-party content do not apply because the company exercised “extensive control over the development of pornographic content on their websites.”

This is a highly unusual decision. Northern District of Alabama Chief Judge L. Scott Coogler, a George W. Bush appointee, sidestepped a discussion of the nuances of Section 230 by making the unprecedented blanket claim that Pornhub was a publisher and not a platform, thereby assigning liability to company for any third-party content posted on the tube site.

In the words of Judge Coogler:

  • The facts of this case are unlike those cases in which neutral search tools or algorithms were misused by bad actors. See Force v. Facebook, 934 F.3d 53, 66-68 (2nd Cir. 2019) (the content provider allegations failed where they were premised on Facebook’s friend- and content-suggestion algorithms, which merely blindly connected users based on their information); Grindr LLC, 765 F. App’x at 591 (Grindr “cannot be held liable for providing . . . tools and functionality available equally to bad actors and the [platform’s] intended users”).
  • Here, the allegations are that Defendants’ tools themselves function in a way to direct users to CSAM in particular, as opposed to treating CSAM the same way that lawful videos on Defendants’ websites are treated.
  • Indeed, Defendants exert extensive control over the development of pornographic content on their websites. Defendants have instructed uploaders and users, down to a granular level, on how to create content, and has made these instructions a condition of use for Modelhub members and Content Partners. Plaintiffs have alleged that Defendants intend to and do direct users to the CSAM that they are seeking by using criteria indicating the illegal nature of the content. 
  • Ultimately, Pornhub simply cannot be likened to other kinds of ICSs that were aptly described in a similar case as “the river[s] through which internet sexual trafficking flows.” 

Today, Judge Coogler decided that the Jane Does’ complaint, one of an array of lawsuits being pursued and promoted by religiously-inspired anti-porn crusading organizations like NCOSE and Exodus Cry, “alleges sufficient facts to plausibly state a claim that Defendants are providers of illegal CSAM content, not merely publishers of third party-created content. Therefore, Defendants are not entitled to CDA Section 230 immunity from Plaintiffs’ TVPRA claims.”

An Attempt to Narrow Section 230 Protections

XBIZ spoke to industry attorney Corey Silverstein, who expressed optimism that "Judge Coogler’s erroneous decision will not be the final word in this case. The 11th Circuit, if or when given the opportunity, will hopefully correct this wrong."

Regardless, Silverstein added, "this is just another example of the continued attacks and attempts to narrow the protections offered by Section 230 — the very law that has allowed the evolution of the free sharing of information on the internet. I continue to find these decisions and lawmakers' attempts, [such as the] EARN IT Act, to narrow and/or destroy Section 230 protections a direct attack on free speech.

“Further, I wish that lawmakers and the judiciary took more time to actually understand the rationale behind the creation of Section 230 to begin with and actually understand where the internet and the free flow of information and ideas would be without Section 230," he said.

“Why would any internet service provider even want to stay in that business were they liable for content that they neither created, authored or even removed?" Silverstein concluded. "As such, these anti-Section 230 folks defy logic and common sense. I would also note that many of these anti-230 lawmakers have been elected into office as a result of being able to campaign on the very online platforms that wouldn’t exist if not for Section 230.”

Alabama Federal Judge Decision on Pornhub/MindGeek

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More