Alabama Federal Judge Denies Section 230 Immunity to MindGeek, Claims Pornhub Is a Publisher

Alabama Federal Judge Denies Section 230 Immunity to MindGeek, Claims Pornhub Is a Publisher

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — An Alabama federal judge today shut down MindGeek’s petition to dismiss a class action lawsuit filed by Jane Does over content posted on Pornhub that allegedly depicts instances of their human trafficking, claiming that Section 230 protections over third-party content do not apply because the company exercised “extensive control over the development of pornographic content on their websites.”

This is a highly unusual decision. Northern District of Alabama Chief Judge L. Scott Coogler, a George W. Bush appointee, sidestepped a discussion of the nuances of Section 230 by making the unprecedented blanket claim that Pornhub was a publisher and not a platform, thereby assigning liability to company for any third-party content posted on the tube site.

In the words of Judge Coogler:

  • The facts of this case are unlike those cases in which neutral search tools or algorithms were misused by bad actors. See Force v. Facebook, 934 F.3d 53, 66-68 (2nd Cir. 2019) (the content provider allegations failed where they were premised on Facebook’s friend- and content-suggestion algorithms, which merely blindly connected users based on their information); Grindr LLC, 765 F. App’x at 591 (Grindr “cannot be held liable for providing . . . tools and functionality available equally to bad actors and the [platform’s] intended users”).
  • Here, the allegations are that Defendants’ tools themselves function in a way to direct users to CSAM in particular, as opposed to treating CSAM the same way that lawful videos on Defendants’ websites are treated.
  • Indeed, Defendants exert extensive control over the development of pornographic content on their websites. Defendants have instructed uploaders and users, down to a granular level, on how to create content, and has made these instructions a condition of use for Modelhub members and Content Partners. Plaintiffs have alleged that Defendants intend to and do direct users to the CSAM that they are seeking by using criteria indicating the illegal nature of the content. 
  • Ultimately, Pornhub simply cannot be likened to other kinds of ICSs that were aptly described in a similar case as “the river[s] through which internet sexual trafficking flows.” 

Today, Judge Coogler decided that the Jane Does’ complaint, one of an array of lawsuits being pursued and promoted by religiously-inspired anti-porn crusading organizations like NCOSE and Exodus Cry, “alleges sufficient facts to plausibly state a claim that Defendants are providers of illegal CSAM content, not merely publishers of third party-created content. Therefore, Defendants are not entitled to CDA Section 230 immunity from Plaintiffs’ TVPRA claims.”

An Attempt to Narrow Section 230 Protections

XBIZ spoke to industry attorney Corey Silverstein, who expressed optimism that "Judge Coogler’s erroneous decision will not be the final word in this case. The 11th Circuit, if or when given the opportunity, will hopefully correct this wrong."

Regardless, Silverstein added, "this is just another example of the continued attacks and attempts to narrow the protections offered by Section 230 — the very law that has allowed the evolution of the free sharing of information on the internet. I continue to find these decisions and lawmakers' attempts, [such as the] EARN IT Act, to narrow and/or destroy Section 230 protections a direct attack on free speech.

“Further, I wish that lawmakers and the judiciary took more time to actually understand the rationale behind the creation of Section 230 to begin with and actually understand where the internet and the free flow of information and ideas would be without Section 230," he said.

“Why would any internet service provider even want to stay in that business were they liable for content that they neither created, authored or even removed?" Silverstein concluded. "As such, these anti-Section 230 folks defy logic and common sense. I would also note that many of these anti-230 lawmakers have been elected into office as a result of being able to campaign on the very online platforms that wouldn’t exist if not for Section 230.”

Alabama Federal Judge Decision on Pornhub/MindGeek

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

ImLive Launches Revamped Member Loyalty Program

Cam platform ImLive has revamped its member loyalty program.

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Creator Networking App 'Plaiir' Launches

Plaiir, a mobile networking app for creators, has officially launched.

Swedish Court Rules LELO Products Do Not Infringe 'Invalid' Satisfyer Patent

A Swedish district court has ruled that a patent filed by Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH is not valid, and therefore three products from pleasure brand LELO are not in violation.

Show More