UK Government Unveils Controversial 'Digital Safety Bill'

UK Government Unveils Controversial 'Digital Safety Bill'

LONDON — Boris Johnson’s Conservative government in the U.K. has finally unveiled its controversial “Online Safety Bill,” and introduced it in Parliament today.

The government focused on “pornography” as the main supposed “online harm.”

The Online Safety Bill, the Johnson government claims, “will protect children from harmful content such as pornography and limit people’s exposure to illegal content, while protecting freedom of speech.”

The lengthy announcement about the proposed legislation declared that the bill’s main mission is for “Parliament to approve what types of ‘legal but harmful’ content platforms must tackle.”

The U.K. is a “constitutional monarchy” with no written constitution, bill of rights, First Amendment or codified Section 230 protection for the monarch’s subjects.

Grandiose Claims About 'Online Safety'

The Conservative government’s statement, published via the official gov.uk website, rather grandly claims the proposed measures are, in fact, “the world-first online safety laws.”

“Internet users are one step closer to a safer online environment as the government’s new world-leading online safety laws are brought before parliament today,” proclaimed the statement signed by Boris Johnson’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport and its leading official, Conservative MP Nadine Dorries.

“The Online Safety Bill marks a milestone in the fight for a new digital age which is safer for users and holds tech giants to account,” the government statement continued.

Chief targets of the bill are “social media platforms, search engines and other apps and websites allowing people to post their own content” — like OnlyFans or Pornhub, or mainstream sites like Twitter or Reddit, which tolerate adult content — “to protect children, tackle illegal activity and uphold their stated terms and conditions.”

Elevating Politicians as a New Online Censorship Body

The bill sets up the appointed U.K. officials running Ofcom, the government's communications regulatory agency, to become essentially a censorship body with “the power to fine companies failing to comply with the laws up to 10% of their annual global turnover, force them to improve their practices and block non-compliant sites.”

Johnson’s government also explicitly threatened “executives whose companies fail to cooperate with Ofcom’s information requests [with] prosecution or jail time within two months of the Bill becoming law, instead of two years as it was previously drafted.”

The government’s statement boasts of literally “a raft of other new offenses [which] have also been added to the Bill to make in-scope companies’ senior managers criminally liable for destroying evidence, failing to attend or providing false information in interviews with Ofcom, and for obstructing the regulator when it enters company offices.”

MP Dorries stated that, after the bill’s passage, “social media platforms will only be required to tackle ‘legal but harmful’ content, such as exposure to self-harm, harassment and eating disorders, set by the [Conservative] government and approved by Parliament.”

Also included within “harmful content,” however, is whatever the current government decides to define as “pornography.”

A 'Constitutional Monarchy' Without First Amendment Protections

Previous versions of the bill and statements by politicians and activists also appeared to target something called “violent pornography” or “extreme pornography,” the definition or assessment of which would be left to the discretion of government officials.

“Previously,” Dorries continued, platforms “would have had to consider whether additional content on their sites met the definition of legal but harmful material. This change removes any incentives or pressure for platforms to over-remove legal content or controversial comments and will clear up the grey area around what constitutes legal but harmful.”

The bill also presents a peculiar version of "freedom of the press" for the First Amendment-less U.K. with a special category of “recognized media outlets” which would get blanket protection to make any statements — regardless of accuracy — without platforms being able to do anything about it.

A Nightmarish Vision of the 'Depraved' Internet

Conservative Minister of State for Security and Borders Damian Hinds added his own vision of the internet where “the most depraved criminals have been given fresh avenues to exploit vulnerable people and ruin lives, whether that be by stealing the innocence of children or destroying finances.”

The new bill very specifically singles out “all websites which publish or host pornography, including commercial sites,” to “put robust checks in place to ensure users are 18 years old or over.”

The small print in the announcement includes the reveal that “the agreed categories of 'legal but harmful' content will be set out in secondary legislation and subject to approval by both Houses of Parliament. Social media platforms will only be required to act on the priority legal harms set out in that secondary legislation, meaning decisions on what types of content are harmful are not delegated to private companies or at the whim of internet executives.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More