9th Circuit Panel Denies Double-Jeopardy Dismissal in Backpage.com Case

9th Circuit Panel Denies Double-Jeopardy Dismissal in Backpage.com Case

SAN FRANCISCO —  A three-judge Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel has upheld a lower court's denial to dismiss the case against the former owners of Backpage.com.

Attorneys for former Backpage.com owners Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin, led by First Amendment expert and noted adult industry attorney Paul Cambria, had sought the dismissal due to double jeopardy, after the pair's first trial ended catastrophically for the government in a mistrial due to prosecutorial misconduct.

"We plan to win in court," Cambria told XBIZ today.

As XBIZ reported, oral arguments were presented earlier this month before judges William A. Fletcher, Jay Bybee and Lawrence Vandyke.

Yesterday, the judges denied the appeal. Federal prosecutors could now move ahead and retry the case.

The loss for Lacey and Larkin comes a year after controversial Judge Susan Brnovich — wife of Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, who recently campaigned for a U.S. Senate seat — declared a mistrial in the case.

The mistrial ruling came after prosecutors repeatedly ignored Judge Brnovich's instructions not to attempt to prejudice the jury by bringing up unrelated and inflammatory “child sex trafficking” insinuations.

“The trial judge declared a mistrial in September 2021 due to prosecutorial misconduct,” Stephen Lemons, editor of the Lacey and Larkin-associated website Front Page Confidential and the leading authority on the case, told XBIZ at the time. “The defense moved for dismissal, arguing that a new trial would violate the Fifth Amendment’s bar on trying someone twice for the same crime.”

Lemons explained that a new judge “denied that motion without holding an evidentiary hearing.” The defense then appealed to the Ninth Circuit, eventually resulting in today’s decision.

Judges: Government's Misconduct 'Not Egregious' Enough

The Ninth Circuit panel, Lemons reported today, “conceded that the government committed ‘misconduct’ and ‘did elicit prejudicial evidence in violation of pretrial rulings,’ but the panel ruled that the misconduct ‘was not so egregious as to compel a finding of an intent’ to provoke a mistrial.”

Lemons explained that “defense attorneys could seek a rehearing by the same panel, a review by a larger, en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit, and/or petition SCOTUS for a writ of certiori.”

A member of the defense team told Front Page Confidential that its attorneys “are still reviewing the decision at this time.”

The defense, Lemons told XBIZ today, "faced a near-Sisyphean task in overcoming the legal standard involved, which required them to show not only that the prosecution caused a mistrial in 2021, but that it intended to provoke a mistrial. Now we wait to see if the defense will seek a review of the panel's ruling and if another trial will be in the works."

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More