9th Circuit Panel Denies Double-Jeopardy Dismissal in Backpage.com Case

9th Circuit Panel Denies Double-Jeopardy Dismissal in Backpage.com Case

SAN FRANCISCO —  A three-judge Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel has upheld a lower court's denial to dismiss the case against the former owners of Backpage.com.

Attorneys for former Backpage.com owners Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin, led by First Amendment expert and noted adult industry attorney Paul Cambria, had sought the dismissal due to double jeopardy, after the pair's first trial ended catastrophically for the government in a mistrial due to prosecutorial misconduct.

"We plan to win in court," Cambria told XBIZ today.

As XBIZ reported, oral arguments were presented earlier this month before judges William A. Fletcher, Jay Bybee and Lawrence Vandyke.

Yesterday, the judges denied the appeal. Federal prosecutors could now move ahead and retry the case.

The loss for Lacey and Larkin comes a year after controversial Judge Susan Brnovich — wife of Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, who recently campaigned for a U.S. Senate seat — declared a mistrial in the case.

The mistrial ruling came after prosecutors repeatedly ignored Judge Brnovich's instructions not to attempt to prejudice the jury by bringing up unrelated and inflammatory “child sex trafficking” insinuations.

“The trial judge declared a mistrial in September 2021 due to prosecutorial misconduct,” Stephen Lemons, editor of the Lacey and Larkin-associated website Front Page Confidential and the leading authority on the case, told XBIZ at the time. “The defense moved for dismissal, arguing that a new trial would violate the Fifth Amendment’s bar on trying someone twice for the same crime.”

Lemons explained that a new judge “denied that motion without holding an evidentiary hearing.” The defense then appealed to the Ninth Circuit, eventually resulting in today’s decision.

Judges: Government's Misconduct 'Not Egregious' Enough

The Ninth Circuit panel, Lemons reported today, “conceded that the government committed ‘misconduct’ and ‘did elicit prejudicial evidence in violation of pretrial rulings,’ but the panel ruled that the misconduct ‘was not so egregious as to compel a finding of an intent’ to provoke a mistrial.”

Lemons explained that “defense attorneys could seek a rehearing by the same panel, a review by a larger, en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit, and/or petition SCOTUS for a writ of certiori.”

A member of the defense team told Front Page Confidential that its attorneys “are still reviewing the decision at this time.”

The defense, Lemons told XBIZ today, "faced a near-Sisyphean task in overcoming the legal standard involved, which required them to show not only that the prosecution caused a mistrial in 2021, but that it intended to provoke a mistrial. Now we wait to see if the defense will seek a review of the panel's ruling and if another trial will be in the works."

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

ImLive Announces Revamped Member Loyalty Program

Cam platform ImLive has revamped its member loyalty program.

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Creator Networking App 'Plaiir' Launches

Plaiir, a mobile networking app for creators, has officially launched.

Swedish Court Rules LELO Products Do Not Infringe 'Invalid' Satisfyer Patent

A Swedish district court has ruled that a patent filed by Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH is not valid, and therefore three products from pleasure brand LELO are not in violation.

Show More