Utah Republican Argues for Return to Pre-1973 Definition of 'Obscenity'

Utah Republican Argues for Return to Pre-1973 Definition of 'Obscenity'

SALT LAKE CITY — A Republican member of the Utah state legislature is arguing for a return to the pre-1973 standard for determining what speech or expression is “obscene” and therefore not protected by the First Amendment.

Utah Rep. Ken Ivory (R-West Jordan) previously authored a bill, HB 374, banning “pornographic and indecent books” in the state’s public schools; it was signed into law in March. Last week, he demanded a total reversal of the last 50 years of legal and judicial practice, dismissing the “Miller test,” which has been the nation's legal standard for a half century, as merely the opinion of a few Supreme Court justices at the time.

The Miller test, developed in the landmark 1973 case Miller v. California, establishes three conditions for determining “obscenity”: (i) Whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards" would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; (ii) Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law; and (iii) Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.

Ivory called for Utah to challenge the Miller test, and the “taken as a whole” concept in particular. Such a challenge, if successful, could open the floodgates for anyone wishing to challenge material based on sexual content or expression.

According to a report by local station KSL NewsRadio, before a meeting of the Education Interim Committee on Wednesday, a reporter asked Ivory if he agreed with the last 50 years of jurisprudence that works should be “taken as a whole” when determining whether they are First Amendment-protected speech.

“Three judges of nine on the Supreme Court said that,” Ivory answered. “It’s not the law. It’s not a holding of the Supreme Court and yet we act as if it is.”

The Purge of Libraries Must Go On

Ivory was at the Capitol demanding that the Utah State Board of Education (USBE) tighten enforcement of HB 374, claiming, “There are books containing graphic content that have been allowed to stay” after an initial purge.

USBE was seeking clarification about interpreting the law, leading the legislature’s managing associate general counsel, Michael Curtis, to remark that the school district is being forced to choose whether it prefers to be sued for “violating a right to access to free speech by removing a book” or for “violating a clear state statute prohibiting a material.”

Utah law, KSL NewsRadio reported, “further defines what is harmful to minors as well as pornography. Both of those definitions say a book has to be taken on the whole and assessed for its literary value.”

But Ivory and other supporters of censorship hope to appeal to Utah's indecency law, under which “if a depiction or description (of a book) violates any one of three criteria within that definition, the book can be pulled without taking it on the whole.” They cite the indecency law's language as “a bright line rule for when a book can be pulled.”

Bright Lines and 'Touching of the Human Buttock'

According to Utah state law, this “bright line” is whether a book depicts or describes the following: “Human genitals in a state of sexual stimulation or arousal. Acts of human masturbation, sexual intercourse, or sodomy. Fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals or pubic region. Fondling or other erotic touching of the human buttock or female breast that, when taken as a whole, has no serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors, considering ages of all minors who could be exposed to the material.”

The Utah version of the Miller test, specifically applied to minors, concerns whether a work “(i) Taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in sex of minors; (ii) is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable material for minors; and (iii) taken as a whole, does not have serious value for minors.”

After the Education Interim Committee meeting, Ivory issued a statement contending that a guidance memo from the state attorney general supported his contention of a "bright line" rule. Ultimately, lawsuits such as those posited by the legislative counsel could test this and potentially lead to a federal ruling.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Kansas Law Firm Deploys Religion, Bunk Science While Recruiting Plaintiffs Under AV Law

Kansas-based personal injury law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley is promoting debunked scientific theories and leveraging religious affiliation against the industry while it seeks potential plaintiffs for lawsuits against adult companies under the state’s age verification law.

UK Tech Secretary Lists Age Verification Among OSA Priorities

Peter Kyle, the U.K.’s Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, on Wednesday made public a draft version of his priorities for implementing the Online Safety Act (OSA), including age verification.

AEBN Publishes Popular Seraches by Country for September, October

AEBN has released its list of popular searches from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Avery Jane Featured on 'Adult Time Podcast'

Avery Jane is the latest guest on the “Adult Time Podcast,” hosted by studio CCO Bree Mills.

FSC: Kansas Law Firm Threatens Adult Site Over Age Verification

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has been notified that Kansas law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley has sent a letter threatening an adult website with a lawsuit for breaking the state's age verification law.

10th Circuit Rejects Final FSC Appeal in Utah AV Case

The United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit on Monday rejected a motion by Free Speech Coalition (FSC) requesting that the full court rehear its appeal in Free Speech Coalition v. Anderson, the industry trade association’s challenge to Utah’s age verification law.

Trump Nominates Project 2025 Contributor, Section 230 Foe to Chair FCC

President-elect Donald Trump has nominated, as his pick to head the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr — an author of Project 2025 who has called for gutting Section 230 protections.

Streamate's Elevate Partners With Miss Mei on Decriminalization Initiative

Streamate’s Elevate initiative is debuting a November collaboration with creator and community advocate Miss Mei that will highlight the modern criminalization of sex work.

RedGIFs Launches New Mobile App

RedGIFs has launched a new mobile app designed to offer users a smoother, faster browsing experience.

Nicole Aniston Guests on Chaturbate's 'Sex Tales' Podcast

Nicole Aniston is the latest guest on Chaturbate’s “Sex Tales” podcast, hosted by Melissa Stratton and Vanniall and streaming on the company’s “Camming Life” YouTube channel.

Show More