Republicans Move Forward With Redefinition of 'Prurient Interest' in Arkansas

Republicans Move Forward With Redefinition of 'Prurient Interest' in Arkansas

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Democratic state senators and LGBTQ+ advocates in Arkansas are raising concerns that a proposed bill targeting drag performances would limit the rights of transgender people and also redefine the legal concept of “prurient interest,” which is at the core of recent Republican attempts to reinstate obscenity prosecutions.

Arkansas Senate Bill 43, sponsored by Sen. Gary Stubblefield (R-Branch), defines a drag performance as a show in which at least one performer exhibits a “gender identity that is different from the performer's gender assigned at birth” and which appeals to the prurient interest, the Arkansas Democrat Gazette reported.

Critics of SB 43 point out that the term “prurient” is “not legally well-defined and could apply to plays and events such as drag queens reading storybooks to children,” the Arkansas Democrat Gazette noted. The term is not currently defined in Arkansas law, but Stubblefield — like other Republican lawmakers across the country — wants to define it to mean “showing excessive interests in sexual matters.” 

The Arkansas Senate approved SB 43 on Tuesday in a 29-6 vote along party lines. If the bill is approved by the State House, it will be sent to Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R).

Gov. Sanders Claims Bill 'Protects the Children'

Yesterday, Sanders endorsed SB 43 and told the press she would sign the bill because she believes it “protects the children of Arkansas.”

Stubblefield told senators on Tuesday that he “can’t think of anything good that can come from taking children and putting them in front of a bunch of grown men dressed like women.”

“Morally, we are going down a funnel,” Stubblefield added.

During a committee hearing last week, Stubblefield quoted at length statements that he alleged came from a drag queen he did not identify. Stubblefield said this anonymous person had “asked him to protect Arkansas’s youth from the titillation of glittery gender-bending artistic displays,” the Arkansas Times reported.

Stubblefield claimed this person had told him that their fellow drag queens “put on makeup, jump up on the floor, writhe around and do sexual things.”

“Would you want a stripper, or porn, to influence your child? It makes no sense at all!” Stubblefield continued. “These are not my words. This is the testimony from a person who is a drag queen. There’s a lot of filth that goes on, a lot of sexual stuff that goes on backstage. There’s a lot of nudity, a lot of sex, a lot of things.”

Stubblefield closed his testimony by reading from the book of Deuteronomy, preaching that “the Bible says if a man dresses like a woman and a woman dresses like a man, it is an abomination to God.”

“It appears to me you’re trying to put a target on people’s backs that are not, according to you, normal,” Sen. Stephanie Flowers (D-Pine Bluff) told Stubblefield.

A Blitz of Republican Bill Proposals to Revive Morality Prosecutions

As XBIZ reported, last week two other Republican state senators in Arkansas introduced a bill requiring age verification before viewing pornographic websites.

Senate Bill 66, which proposes a “Protection of Minors from Distribution of Harmful Material Act,” is sponsored by Sen. Tyler Dees (R-Siloam Springs) and Sen. Jim Petty (R-Van Buren). The proposed legislation is a copycat version of Louisiana’s Act 440, a new law championed by a religious anti-porn activist Republican legislator.

According to NBC affiliate KARK, SB 66 would require “a digitized identification card to prove that anyone from Arkansas trying to enter a pornography website is over 18.”

The bill also claims that “pornography is creating a public health crisis and contributes to the hyper-sexualization of minors,” KARK reported.

The bill includes the senators’ definition of what kinds of material would constitute “pornography,” and mandates that “any website with over 23.33% of its material meeting the pornography description” institute age verification.

Republicans throughout the country are seeking to outlaw all adult content by overturning the 1973 “Miller Test” differentiating First Amendment-protected sexual material from illegal “obscene” material produced to appeal to “a prurient interest.”

The United States does not currently have a national definition of obscenity. Jurisprudence has established the Miller Test, which has been a legal standard in federal courts for a half-century.

Last month, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), a bill that nominally aims to “establish a national definition of obscenity” but which would, in effect, outlaw all online sexual content nationwide.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More