Meta Requests Sanctions After Performers Withdraw Allegations of Wire Transfers in OnlyFans Conspiracy Case

Meta Requests Sanctions After Performers Withdraw Allegations of Wire Transfers in OnlyFans Conspiracy Case

SAN FRANCISCO — Meta is asking a California federal judge to reject the civil lawsuit alleging a conspiracy to blacklist OnlyFans’ competitors and their brand ambassadors.

The internet giant is also seeking sanctions against plaintiffs Alana Evans, Kelly Pierce and Ruby after the performers earlier this month withdrew their previous statements about alleged wire transfers between OnlyFans parent company Fenix International Ltd. and Meta executives.

On Monday, Meta filed a supplemental report in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California asserting that the performers’ disavowal is evidence that their allegations were “false and frivolous from the outset.”

As XBIZ reported, Adult Performance Artists Guild board officers Evans, Pierce and Ruby originally filed the civil lawsuit in February 2022, against OnlyFans, its owner Leonid Radvinsky and Instagram and Facebook’s parent company, Meta. The suit replicates claims from an earlier lawsuit filed on behalf of FanCentro in November 2021, alleging a conspiracy to engage in “tortious interference with contract and intentional interference with prospective business.”

Attorney David Azar of Beverly Hills firm Milberg Coleman Bryson Grossman, who is representing the group as the first three of a class involving all adult performers and content creators, is also one of the lawyers representing FanCentro in its related action against OnlyFans.

In early July, OnlyFans and Meta filed motions seeking dismissal of the performers’ lawsuit, alleging that the discovery process revealed no evidence of a conspiracy.

At the time, Fenix International also asked District Judge William Alsup to sanction the performers for spreading “frivolous allegations.”

Performers Formally Withdraw Allegations of Wire Transfers

On July 19, Evans, Pierce and Ruby formally withdrew their assertions about wire transfers made as part of their amended complaint and also “any statements that appear in briefs they have filed, or that were made during oral arguments, that advocated on the basis of the withdrawn allegations.”

Following the initial discovery phase, they told the judge, “Plaintiffs can no longer certify that the particular factual contentions in the withdrawn paragraphs and exhibit will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery.”

Last Thursday, Evans, Pierce and Ruby urged the judge to reject Fenix’s bid for sanctions, saying “they presented their anti-competitive allegations in good faith after doing their due diligence,” legal news site Law360 reported.

“No one has explained why there was different treatment of identical content, or why that differential treatment does not support a reasonable inference that it resulted from a quid pro quo between Fenix defendants and individuals working for Meta,” the performers told the judge.

Meta: 'It's a Classic Bait-and-Switch'

In this week’s filing, Meta argued that the performers’ withdrawal of their claims about the supposed wire transfers was not sufficient, Law 360 reported.

“That is not how this works,” the Meta attorneys told the judge. “This court should not permit plaintiffs to breeze into federal court, level incendiary allegations that very senior Meta personnel were bribed by OnlyFans, and then simply say, ‘Oops, never mind’ when it is shown that those allegations were false and frivolous from the outset.”

According to Meta, the claims against the company by Evans, Pierce and Ruby “rise and fall on the veracity of their allegations of bribery” and were a basis upon which U.S. District Judge William Alsup allowed the lawsuit to continue. Meta attorneys are therefore requesting dismissal of the lawsuit or else an expedited summary judgment schedule.

According to Meta’s filing, “plaintiffs have litigated this case as a classic bait-and-switch: they made specific bribery allegations that allowed this case to survive a motion to dismiss, failed to provide or obtain any evidence supporting those allegations, and now seek to withdraw those allegations — all while seemingly expecting this case to proceed in some form. This abuse of the court system should not be permitted.”

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Braindance Unveils '6DOF' VR Tech

Interactive virtual reality platform Braindance has debuted its new Six Degrees of Freedom (6DOF) VR technology.

Kiiroo, Pineapple Support Launch 'Empower Hour' Series on FeelHubX YouTube Channel

Kiiroo and Pineapple Support have teamed up to launch the “Empower Hour” series on the FeelHubX YouTube channel.

Kansas Law Firm Deploys Religion, Bunk Science While Recruiting Plaintiffs Under AV Law

Kansas-based personal injury law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley is promoting debunked scientific theories and leveraging religious affiliation against the industry while it seeks potential plaintiffs for lawsuits against adult companies under the state’s age verification law.

UK Tech Secretary Lists Age Verification Among OSA Priorities

Peter Kyle, the U.K.’s Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, on Wednesday made public a draft version of his priorities for implementing the Online Safety Act (OSA), including age verification.

AEBN Publishes Popular Seraches by Country for September, October

AEBN has released its list of popular searches from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Avery Jane Featured on 'Adult Time Podcast'

Avery Jane is the latest guest on the “Adult Time Podcast,” hosted by studio CCO Bree Mills.

FSC: Kansas Law Firm Threatens Adult Site Over Age Verification

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has been notified that Kansas law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley has sent a letter threatening an adult website with a lawsuit for breaking the state's age verification law.

10th Circuit Rejects Final FSC Appeal in Utah AV Case

The United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit on Monday rejected a motion by Free Speech Coalition (FSC) requesting that the full court rehear its appeal in Free Speech Coalition v. Anderson, the industry trade association’s challenge to Utah’s age verification law.

Trump Nominates Project 2025 Contributor, Section 230 Foe to Chair FCC

President-elect Donald Trump has nominated, as his pick to head the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr — an author of Project 2025 who has called for gutting Section 230 protections.

Streamate's Elevate Partners With Miss Mei on Decriminalization Initiative

Streamate’s Elevate initiative is debuting a November collaboration with creator and community advocate Miss Mei that will highlight the modern criminalization of sex work.

Show More