Google's New Explicit Image Takedown Policy Unlikely to Affect Commercial Images

Google's New Explicit Image Takedown Policy Unlikely to Affect Commercial Images

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — Google’s updated policies allowing individuals to remove “personal, explicit images” from Google Search results will not affect most commercial images created by a third party with appropriate contracts and releases.

As XBIZ reported, the policy, which was unveiled last week, was designed to target nonconsensual explicit imagery and to enable individuals “to remove from Search any of their personal, explicit images that they no longer wish to be visible in Search,” Google VP for Trust Danielle Romain shared through the platform’s blog.

At the time, Romain specified that the new policy “doesn’t apply to content you are currently commercializing.”

Still, questions lingered among adult companies and creators about situations involving explicit images of individuals who were under contract and/or had given full releases to third-party content producers, including studios and companies.

A Google rep told XBIZ that under the new takedown policy, individuals “can request the removal of third-party created content that features them, if it has been removed by the original publisher.”

The Google rep directed XBIZ to the full text of the new policy, which states that for the company to consider the content for removal, it must meet the following requirements:

The imagery shows you (or the individual you’re representing) nude, in a sexual act, or an intimate state.

You (or the individual you’re representing) didn’t consent to the imagery or the act and it was made publicly available, or the imagery was made available online without your consent.

You are not currently being paid for this content online or elsewhere.

For non-authorized commercial content, such as pirated material, that does not fall under those requirements, Google instead recommends requesting the removal under DMCA.

Two Specific Scenarios

According to the policy, if Individual A agrees to perform in an explicit sex scene for Company B and signs a contract, release form and 2257 form, which are in the possession of Company B, but then later changes their mind and wants the content removed from Search, the content can only be removed if Company B has withdrawn it from distribution.

Under the new policy, Google would also not automatically remove content if, for example, Individual A agreed to perform in an explicit sex scene for Company B, but Company B later sold the content and transferred the rights to Company C, which marketed it in a way that Individual A disapproved of, leading Individual A to request its removal from Search.

The performer might have other options, however, particularly if the third-party publisher were found to have utilized predatory means in the production of the content featuring the reporting user. A notable example of that scenario would be the GirlsDoPorn case.

Another scenario in which the performer could request removal of search images is if the third-party producer relinquished its rights to the content.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More