Australia's Top Online Censor Fines X for Refusing to Answer Moderation Questions

Australia's Top Online Censor Fines X for Refusing to Answer Moderation Questions

CANBERRA, Australia — Australia’s top censor, E-Safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, has slapped X.com with a fine of 610,500 Australian dollars (approximately $386,000) for violating the country’s new Online Safety Act.

The fine is reportedly the first instance of Inman Grant’s office penalizing an online platform over issues related to user-generated content. However, X is not the only company under scrutiny by Inman Grant.

Earlier this year, Inman Grant sent formal questions to several international online platforms demanding explanations as to “what they were doing to tackle a proliferation of child sexual exploitation, sexual extortion and the livestreaming of child sexual abuse,” the Associated Press reported Monday.

According to The Guardian, the tech companies, as well as gaming platforms Twitch and Discord, were given 35 days to respond to the commissioner’s questions or risk fines of up to $687,000 a day, legal demands which came six months after similar notices were issued to Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Snap and Omegle.

Inman Grant claimed that X and Google “did not comply with the notices, with Google giving generic responses to some specific questions, while some questions to X went entirely unanswered,” The Guardian reported Monday.

“I think there’s a degree of defiance there,” Inman Grant told the AP as justification for the six-figure fine to X.com. She cited the company’s refusal to answer questions about how many staffers remained on its trust and safety team since Elon Musk purchased the company in 2022.

Google has been given a formal warning, while X was given an infringement notice and now has 28 days to either pay the fine or provide responses to all her questions.

An Anti-Porn Bureaucrat With Broad Oversight Powers

As XBIZ reported, the vocally anti-porn Inman Grant was appointed by the former conservative government of Australia. She has acknowledged having conversations with U.S.-based, religiously-inspired lobby NCOSE and even appeared on an NCOSE podcast at the Coalition to End Sexual Exploitation summit in July 2021, shortly after the Australian Parliament passed the country’s Online Safety Act.

Before moving to Australia, Inman Grant received degrees from Boston University and American University, worked in politics in Washington D.C. and then for tech giants Microsoft, Twitter and Adobe. According to her official bio, she now claims to “lead the world’s first government regulatory agency committed to keeping its citizens safer online.” She was reappointed for a further five-year term by the Australian government in January 2022.

Inman Grant submitted her road map for imposing age verification requirements on “online pornographic sites” back in March, but in August, the liberal-leaning Australian government announced that it will not require adult websites to implement age verification, one of Inman Grant’s main objectives. According to a report by The Guardian, the decision was made due to “concerns about privacy and the lack of maturity of the technology.”

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland’s response to the document instead instructed Inman Grant “to work with the industry to develop a new code to educate parents on how to access filtering software and limit children’s access to such material or sites that are not appropriate,” the Guardian reported in August.

Main Image: Australia's top online censor, E-Safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC Drops Opposition to California Age Verification Bill After Amendments

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has dropped its formal opposition to California’s age verification bill AB 3080, after an amendment secured through months of discussions with the bill’s author was heard by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Texas Age Verification Challenge

The United States Supreme Court granted on Tuesday the petition for a writ of certiorari in the Free Speech Coalition-led challenge to Texas’ age verification law, agreeing to hear the case in the next term.

Dorcel Group Acquires LifeSelector

Dorcel Group has acquired interactive content company LifeSelector.

Etsy Updates Policy to Ban Sale of Most Adult Pleasure Products, Content

Etsy will ban sales of most pleasure products and content that depicts sex acts and genitalia starting July 29.

Jamie Page Is LoyalFans' 'Featured Creator' for July

LoyalFans has named Jamie Page as its Featured Creator for July.

Stripper, Adult Businesses Challenge Florida's Under-21 Ban for Adult Entertainment Workers

Strip clubs and other adult entertainment establishments in Florida are challenging the state’s law that prevents them from employing adults between the ages of 18 and 20.

Byborg's Le Shaw Research Institute Teams Up With SWOP Behind Bars

LiveJasmin parent company Byborg Enterprises’ Le Shaw International Sexual Health and Wellness Research Institute has joined forces with U.S.-based sex worker advocacy group SWOP Behind Bars.

AI Erotic Storytelling Platform 'Erota' Launches

Erota, a new AI-powered erotic storytelling platform, has debuted.

Indiana Court Blocks Age Verification Law

A U.S. district court in Indiana has blocked the state's age verification law from taking effect this coming Monday, July 1.

Sex Worker Rights Advocates Speak at UN Criticizing Stigmatizing Report

Several sex worker rights organizations and advocates provided input this week at the United Nations office in Geneva, addressing a recent controversial report by the Human Rights Council’s special rapporteur on violence against women and girls, which made broad claims about sex work and adult content, and also endorsed different forms of criminalization.

Show More