Judge in Performers' Blacklisting Lawsuit Says Meta Policy Sounds 'Nefarious'

Judge in Performers' Blacklisting Lawsuit Says Meta Policy Sounds 'Nefarious'

SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge, overseeing a lawsuit claiming that Meta conspired with OnlyFans to blacklist rival premium fan platforms’ talent, said during a hearing Wednesday that the tech giant’s lack of archiving of its “Dangerous Organizations and Individuals” (DOI) list sounded “nefarious.”

As XBIZ reported, Adult Performance Artists Guild board officers Alana Evans, Kelly Pierce and Ruby filed the civil lawsuit in February 2022 against OnlyFans and its owner, as well as against Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook. The suit replicated claims from an earlier lawsuit filed on behalf of FanCentro in November 2021, alleging a conspiracy to engage in “tortious interference with contract and intentional interference with prospective business.”

In March, however, the plaintiffs sought to drop the lawsuit, telling the court that “based on the information Meta defendants provided, the information essential to plaintiffs’ class allegations is not available,” making further discovery efforts “futile.” This was after Meta informed them that the company “found no evidence that any competitor platform was currently on the list, or had been nominated for inclusion,” according to the plaintiffs’ motion.

The plaintiffs are now seeking to drop the suit in such a way as to leave open the possibility of future antitrust claims. Disputing this, Meta has asked the judge to instead issue a summary judgment in the company’s favor.

During this week’s hearing, U.S. District Judge William Alsup questioned the plaintiffs’ counsel’s strategy of not deposing the witnesses offered by Meta, but reserved his strongest language to lambast the tech giant for its peculiar record-keeping methods regarding updates and changes to its controversial DOI blacklist.

The rebuke was in response to Meta attorney K. Winn Allen’s explanation that Meta “has a collaborative review process before new users are added to Meta’s DOI list that involves Meta’s content team, policy team, communications team and legal departments, among others,” legal news site Law 360 reported.

Meta only produced selected old versions of the DOI lists that were included in the email communications disclosed during discovery.

The judge added that it bothers him that a large company like Meta would not have a protocol to regularly store and archive the different versions of its DOI list.

“That sounds nefarious to me, that you are destroying evidence before it is needed,” Alsup told Meta’s attorneys when they implied that the list was a “living” document, always mutating. 

“The list is not living,” the judge pointed out. “It dies each day.”

Alsup appeared especially baffled by the practice of not keeping records on the list because of his background as a corporate attorney familiar with compliance issues. When reviewing the statements by Meta’s attorneys, he said, he thought, “My god, why don’t they keep that?” 

“If I was a lawyer, I would advise them to keep the document,” he added, noting that this would enable the company to share updates of the DOI list with law enforcement.

“So you see, I’m suspicious,” Alsup told Allen. “Your explanation raises more questions than it answers.”

The plaintiffs celebrated the judge’s remarks as a victory.

“I am happy that the judge is having just as hard of a time as we are believing the data doesn’t exist,” Evans told XBIZ. “I hope to see this continue to move forward.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Creator Networking App 'Plaiir' Launches

Plaiir, a mobile networking app for creators, has officially launched.

Swedish Court Rules LELO Products Do Not Infringe 'Invalid' Satisfyer Patent

A Swedish district court has ruled that a patent filed by Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH is not valid, and therefore three products from pleasure brand LELO are not in violation.

North Dakota House Committee Questions Anti-Porn 'Public Health Hazard' Claim

The North Dakota House of Representatives Education Committee on Monday amended a resolution that would have recognized pornography as a “public health hazard,” instead replacing that language with a call for further study into whether such a designation is appropriate.

Show More