Internet Defamation Case Goes to Calif. High Court

SAN FRANCISCO — California’s highest court on Wednesday unanimously accepted a case that will determine whether Internet businesses can be held liable for defamatory website postings.

The state Supreme Court said it will hear a civil suit filed by Roger M. Grace, an eBay seller who sued a buyer and eBay after the buyer had posted negative comments about him.

Earlier this year, the state’s Court of Appeal said that website operators who knowingly repeat a defamatory remark are not immune from liability under the federal Communications Decency Act because it does not immunize distributors.

The appellate court did, however, uphold the dismissal of eBay Inc. from a suit by Grace. His claim against eBay is within the scope of a release that is part of the eBay user agreement, the appeal court said in its ruling.

The libel claim against eBay was initiated after Tim Neeley, who sells Hollywood memorabilia on the site, posted on eBay a feedback comment about Grace, who purchased several items from the seller: “Complaint: SHOULD BE BANNED FROM EBAY!!!! DISHONEST ALL THE WAY!!!!”

Grace, publisher of the Los Angeles Bulletin and the Metropolitan News-Enterprise, notified eBay that the seller’s comments were defamatory, but eBay refused to remove them.

Grace sued eBay and the seller, alleging counts against eBay for libel, specific performance of eBay’s user agreement with the seller, and violation of the unfair competition law. Grace withdrew the second count after eBay removed the challenged comments from its website.

The appellate court concluded that eBay could not avail itself of CDA immunity because it was a distributor.

“Although a distributor can be held liable for libel in certain circumstances, a distributor is subject to a different standard of liability from that of a primary publisher, and liability as a distributor ordinarily requires a greater showing of culpability,” the court said in its ruling.

EBay also contested the complaint based on language of 1996’s CDA and a release clause in its user agreement.

EBay's website “User Agreement” contains a written release that states, "Because we are a venue, in the event that you have a dispute with one or more users, you release eBay (and our officers, directors ... ) from claims, demands and damages (actual and consequential) of every kind and nature, known and unknown, suspected and unsuspected, disclosed and undisclosed, arising out of or in any way connected with such disputes."

In his appeal to the state Court of Appeal, Grace argued that the language of the release is not sufficiently precise to encompass a claim against eBay based on defamatory information provided by a third party and that his dispute is not merely a dispute with a user, but a dispute with eBay directly.

It disagreed, holding that the type of dispute referenced in the release clearly encompasses a dispute with another user relating to comments posted by the user on the website.

Grace, who is also an attorney, was told by the appeal court that he likely blundered in his legal strategy.

“The appropriate place for such a legal argument would have been in Grace’s opposition to the demurrer and in his opening brief on appeal, rather than in an amended complaint,” the court said. “In any event, in light of our conclusion that 47 U.S.C. § 230 [of the CDA] provides no immunity in these circumstances and that Grace released his claims and demands against eBay, the question of constitutionality does not arise.”

After the state Court of Appeal ruling, Grace blasted the court’s reasoning to a reporter at ZDNet, calling it “disturbing.”

"The ruling is just too sophomoric and silly not to be appealed," Grace said. “I don't think [eBay] can shrug their shoulders and stand on immunity."

The case is Roger M. Grace vs. eBay Inc., No. S127338.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Ofcom: Age Assurance Going Live Across 'Thousands' of Porn Sites

U.K. communications regulator Ofcom said in a statement Thursday that providers of online pornography are implementing age assurance across “thousands of sites” accessible in the U.K., in response to Ofcom’s Online Safety Act (OSA) enforcement program.

Age Verification Watch: Patching the Holes

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Ofcom Fines OnlyFans Parent Company Over Inaccurate Age Verification Reporting

U.K. communications regulator Ofcom has fined OnlyFans parent company Fenix International Ltd. $1.36 million for inaccurate reporting of its age verification measures.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Swedish Court Rules LELO Products Do Not Infringe 'Invalid' Satisfyer Patent

A Swedish district court has ruled that a patent filed by Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH is not valid, and therefore three products from pleasure brand LELO are not in violation.

North Dakota House Committee Questions Anti-Porn 'Public Health Hazard' Claim

The North Dakota House of Representatives Education Committee on Monday amended a resolution that would have recognized pornography as a “public health hazard,” instead replacing that language with a call for further study into whether such a designation is appropriate.

Wyoming Governor Signs Age Verification Law

Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon signed the state's new age verification bill into law yesterday.

Show More