ICANN Updates Domain Transfer Policy

MARINA DEL REY, Calif. – Recently, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) announced that its new inter-registrar domain name transfer policy had gone into effect after unanimous approval by both the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) and ICANN's Board of Directors.

According to a statement released by ICANN, "[E]nhanced domain name portability will provide for greater consumer and business choice, enabling domain name registrants to select the registrar that offers the best services and price." The new transfer policy is designed to simplify and standardize the domain name transfer process in order to prevent abuse, and is conceptually similar to how telephone number portability works in many countries.

Central to the new policy is its efforts to provide strong protections against unauthorized transfers, requiring registrars to use a clear, standardized form of authorization that "provides for the express consent of the domain name registrant prior to the initiation of any transfer." While registrants may elect to "lock" their domains as a means of preventing unauthorized transfers from one registrar to another, the policy also has provisions allowing authorized parties to easily remove this "lock."

One of the key elements of the new policy is the establishment of a robust dispute resolution process for resolving disputes between registrars, including registries implementing a "transfer undo" functionality to provide for efficiently reversing any transfer initiated in violation of the policy.

This dispute resolution process may be put to the test over a controversial element of the new policy, that is outlined in Section 3: "Failure by the Registrar of Record to respond within five (5) calendar days to a notification from the Registry regarding a transfer request will result in a default 'approval' of the transfer. In the event that a Transfer Contact listed in the Whois has not confirmed their request to transfer with the Registrar of Record and the Registrar of Record has not explicitly denied the transfer request, the default action will be that the Registrar of Record must allow the transfer to proceed."

The upshot of this provision is that anyone can submit a transfer request for any domain, and if the domain holder does not respond to the email notification regarding this transfer within 5 days, the registrant could effectively lose their domain.

Despite this potentially problematic provision, a recent OECD report concluded that "ICANN's reform of the market structure for the registration of generic top level domain names has been very successful. The division between registry and registrar functions has created a competitive market that has lowered prices and encouraged innovation. The initial experience with competition at the registry level, in association with a successful process to introduce new gTLDs, has also shown positive results."

Domain name owners have also recently begun benefiting from ICANN's implementation of a Redemption Grace Period Service that provides a 30-day period for domain name holders to reclaim their names if deleted unintentionally from a registry database.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Peter Hooke Launches New Paysite

Peter Hooke has launched an official website through PAYSITE.

Pineapple Support Names Ny Ny Lew as Brand Ambassador

Pineapple Support has named Ny Ny Lew as its newest brand ambassador.

Federal AV Proposal Passes House, Faces Senate Opposition

The U.S. House of Representatives on Monday passed the Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act, which includes provisions to make age verification by adult websites federal law, but the bill still faces tough going in the Senate.

Devin Drills Launches New Paysite

Creator Devin Drills has launched an official website through PAYSITE.

AV Bulletin: Midyear Roundup

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, more state age verification laws have been enacted around the United States, as well as proposed at the federal level and in other countries. Meanwhile, lawsuits resulting from AV laws have begun to play out in the courts. This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Judge Dismisses Last NCOSE-Backed Suit Over Kansas AV Law

A federal judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit alleging that adult site SuperPorn violated Kansas’ age verification law, citing lack of jurisdiction after similarly dismissing two related cases earlier this year.

ASACP Updates 'Restricted to Adults' Labeling Resource Page

The Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) has updated its Restricted to Adults (RTA) labeling resource page.

Federal AV Proposal Scores Minor Win in House but Remains in Doubt

A newly announced bipartisan agreement in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce may soon bring a proposed federal age verification law before the full House, but the measure continues to face an uphill battle.

Arizona Governor Vetoes 'Protect Act' With New Consent Provisions

Arizona Governor Kate Hobbs on Friday vetoed HB 2133, the “Protect Act,” which would have imposed new requirements for adult content uploaded online.

Brazil Begins Monitoring 18 Adult Sites for AV Compliance

Brazil’s National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) is now monitoring 18 high-traffic adult websites for compliance with the country’s Digital Statute for Children and Adolescents (Digital ECA), which requires such sites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Show More