Extreme Associates Ruling Isn’t Necessarily Victory for Adult

JOHNSTOWN, Pa. — Friday’s federal court decision dismissing obscenity charges against the owners of Extreme Associates Inc. presents a victory for Rob Black and partner Janet Romano, buts its implications for adult industry as a whole remain up in the air, a legal expert says.

While the ruling is currently being considered a blow to the Justice Department’s two-year pursuit of Extreme, it could also set a dangerous precedent if it is appealed and reversed by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

U.S. District Judge Gary L. Lancaster in Pittsburgh found federal obscenity laws unconstitutional as applied to the case of Black, aka Robert Zicari, of Chatsworth, Calif.

The case against Black, owner of gonzo-themed ExtremeAssociates.com, was the first federal obscenity prosecution against a video manufacturer in a decade. If convicted, Black and Romano faced up to 50 years in prison and a fine of $2.5 million.

The government’s case zeroed-in on the video ''Forced Entry,'' which stars and is directed by Black's wife, Romano, under the name Lizzie Borden. The company bills the film as a ''stunningly disturbing look at a serial killer, Satanic rituals, and the depths of human depravity.''

In a release shortly after the ruling, U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan in Johnstown, Pa., said that her office is “reviewing the ruling and examining our options, which could include an appeal to the [3rd Circuit].”

A spokeswoman for Buchanan on Monday would not elaborate on the Justice Department’s next step, but First Amendment attorney J. D. Obenberger expounded on possible legal scenarios.

“The government will surely move for reconsideration. Reconsideration will probably be denied,” Obenberger said. “Then the government must decide whether to appeal the decision.

“By doing so, it risks that the 3rd Circuit, sitting in Philadelphia, will affirm, broading the precedential [binding] effect of this decision to a much larger part of the East.

“After resolution by the 3rd Circuit, either side might then seek review in the U.S. Supreme Court. When before the Supreme Court, the validity of all obscenity statutes as applied to COPA-compliant adult sites, will be in issue.”

With the Justice Department’s initial blow in United States vs. Extreme Associates Inc., No. 03-0203, Obenberger said that obscenity indictments will continue, despite Friday’s ruling.

“We cannot expect the obscenity laws to fall like apples from a tree in Autumn,” he said. “This decision binds no other court and it is very, very possible that other judges in other jurisdictions will disagree as the issue comes before them.”

In related news, ABC's "Nightline" will conduct an interview with Black and discuss the case against Extreme Associates. Monday's program begins at 11:30 p.m.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Ofcom Fines OnlyFans Parent Company Over Inaccurate Age Verification Reporting

U.K. communications regulator Ofcom has fined OnlyFans parent company Fenix International Ltd. $1.36 million for inaccurate reporting of its age verification measures.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Swedish Court Rules LELO Products Do Not Infringe 'Invalid' Satisfyer Patent

A Swedish district court has ruled that a patent filed by Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH is not valid, and therefore three products from pleasure brand LELO are not in violation.

North Dakota House Committee Questions Anti-Porn 'Public Health Hazard' Claim

The North Dakota House of Representatives Education Committee on Monday amended a resolution that would have recognized pornography as a “public health hazard,” instead replacing that language with a call for further study into whether such a designation is appropriate.

Wyoming Governor Signs Age Verification Law

Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon signed the state's new age verification bill into law yesterday.

Florida Bill Would Auto-Filter Porn for All Users, Not Just Minors

Florida lawmakers have introduced legislation to require manufacturers to equip tablets and smartphones with a filter that would prevent all users from accessing material deemed harmful to minors, to be automatically enabled on devices activated in that state.

Nigeria to Ban All Porn Websites, Penalize Non-Compliant ISPs

Nigeria's House of Representatives on Tuesday directed its telecom regulator, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), to immediately block all porn websites across the country and to enforce that ban.

Show More