Google Cloaking and Stuffing Its Own Pages?

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — Rumors that Google may have been engaging in a cloaking and keyword stuffing activities, forbidden by the search engine’s own policies, have gained more credence, as examinations of Google HTML code seem to point to the search giant displaying different results for surfers than it does for its own spidering tool.

The discovery places an ominous tone on a seemingly innocuous statement made by CEO Eric Shmidt in an August 2004 article about the company’s IPO.

When asked about “Don’t be evil,” the Google corporate motto, Schmidt said, “Evil is what [co-founder] Sergey [Brin] says it is.”

Typically, Google frowns deeply on both cloaking, the act of displaying one web page to surfers and a different one to bots, and keyword stuffing, or placing a ton of similar keywords within a page in order to artificially increase its page rank. In fact, Google’s own guidelines warn webmasters that either activity could result in a permanent ban from the Google index.

A look at the source code of both this page about AdWords policies and a cached version of the same page that Google has since removed seem to bear out the accusations.

While the title of the non-cached version that users typically see reads, “Google AdWords Support: Why do traffic estimates for my Ad Group differ from those given by the standalone tool,” the title of the cached version, the one that is displayed to search engine bots as they spider sites, reads, “traffic estimator, traffic estimates, traffic tool, estimate traffic Google AdWords Support.”

What the implications of a corporate entity like Google, which has a fiduciary duty to its stock holders and, therefore, a right to tailor its engine to make money, violating its own terms of service are unclear, as is whether Google even did something wrong.

The page in question was one of Google’s own help pages and not competing for ranks with outside pages.

“Looks to me like they’re using the technique internally to file things orderly, since they’re generating content that directly populates the database,” wrote Slashdotter Mr. Z. “The nice, handy newline between the keywords and the actual title in the HTML source also makes it trivial for scripts to strip it out later. If they were trying to hide something, they’d teach their cacher to delete the ‘secret’ keyword.”

“Absolutely,” responded pbranes. “People tend to forget that Google is a corporation. They can do whatever they want with their search engine. Their goal in life is to keep you looking at their pages and using their search engine so that they can show you more ads. It’s all about money.”

Google was unavailable for comment at deadline and had not issued a statement about the source code or why they removed the page.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More