Google Cloaking and Stuffing Its Own Pages?

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — Rumors that Google may have been engaging in a cloaking and keyword stuffing activities, forbidden by the search engine’s own policies, have gained more credence, as examinations of Google HTML code seem to point to the search giant displaying different results for surfers than it does for its own spidering tool.

The discovery places an ominous tone on a seemingly innocuous statement made by CEO Eric Shmidt in an August 2004 article about the company’s IPO.

When asked about “Don’t be evil,” the Google corporate motto, Schmidt said, “Evil is what [co-founder] Sergey [Brin] says it is.”

Typically, Google frowns deeply on both cloaking, the act of displaying one web page to surfers and a different one to bots, and keyword stuffing, or placing a ton of similar keywords within a page in order to artificially increase its page rank. In fact, Google’s own guidelines warn webmasters that either activity could result in a permanent ban from the Google index.

A look at the source code of both this page about AdWords policies and a cached version of the same page that Google has since removed seem to bear out the accusations.

While the title of the non-cached version that users typically see reads, “Google AdWords Support: Why do traffic estimates for my Ad Group differ from those given by the standalone tool,” the title of the cached version, the one that is displayed to search engine bots as they spider sites, reads, “traffic estimator, traffic estimates, traffic tool, estimate traffic Google AdWords Support.”

What the implications of a corporate entity like Google, which has a fiduciary duty to its stock holders and, therefore, a right to tailor its engine to make money, violating its own terms of service are unclear, as is whether Google even did something wrong.

The page in question was one of Google’s own help pages and not competing for ranks with outside pages.

“Looks to me like they’re using the technique internally to file things orderly, since they’re generating content that directly populates the database,” wrote Slashdotter Mr. Z. “The nice, handy newline between the keywords and the actual title in the HTML source also makes it trivial for scripts to strip it out later. If they were trying to hide something, they’d teach their cacher to delete the ‘secret’ keyword.”

“Absolutely,” responded pbranes. “People tend to forget that Google is a corporation. They can do whatever they want with their search engine. Their goal in life is to keep you looking at their pages and using their search engine so that they can show you more ads. It’s all about money.”

Google was unavailable for comment at deadline and had not issued a statement about the source code or why they removed the page.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

SWR Data Publishes 'Clip Trend' Report

Adult industry market research outfit SWR Data has published a report on the performance of clip platforms and sales.

Another German Court Rejects Blocking Orders Against Pornhub, YouPorn

A German court has blocked the Rhineland-Palatinate Media Authority (MA RLP) from forcing telecom providers based within the court’s jurisdiction to cut off access to Aylo-owned adult sites Pornhub and YouPorn.

Ofcom Fines Kick Online Entertainment $1 Million for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Thursday fined Kick Online Entertainment 800,000 pounds (more than $1 million) for failing to implement age checks as required for compliance with the Online Safety Act.

FSC Details Legislative Outlook for 2026

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has laid out the legislative outlook for the industry in 2026.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches by Country for December, January

AEBN has released the list of popular searches from its straight and gay theaters, by country, for December and January.

Jim Austin Joins CrakRevenue Team

Strategist Jim Austin has been hired by CrakRevenue.

Judge Dismisses NCOSE-Backed Suits Against Adult Sites Over Kansas AV Law

A federal judge on Tuesday dismissed lawsuits brought against two adult websites in Kansas for alleged violations of the state’s age verification law.

Aylo/SWOP Panel Spotlights Creators' Struggle for Digital, Financial Rights

Aylo and Sex Workers Outreach Project (SWOP) Behind Bars presented, on Tuesday, an online panel on creators’ rights, debanking and deplatforming.

AV Bulletin: Canada, Italy, Australia Updates

Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, more state age verification laws have been enacted around the United States, as well as proposed at the federal level and in other countries. This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Holly Randall Soft Launches 'Wet Ink' Magazine

Holly Randall has officially soft-launched the creator-focused publication Wet Ink Magazine.

Show More