Obscenity Bill in Kansas Could Expose Educators to Prosecution

TOPEKA, Kan. — A new measure being considered by the state legislature would remove educator exemptions from Kansas’ obscenity laws and require teachers there to receive approval from their local school board to use any teaching materials that could be considered legally obscene.

The state’s current obscenity law holds that it is a “defense to a prosecution for obscenity” if the allegedly obscene material was “purchased, leased or otherwise acquired by a public, private or parochial school, college or university, and that such material was either sold, leased, distributed or disseminated by a teacher, instructor, professor or other faculty member or administrator of such school as part of or incident to an approved course or program of instruction at such school.”

An amendment to Senate Bill 492 (SB492) proposed by Sen. Karin Brownlee, R-Olathe, would introduce new language to existing state law that “a teacher shall not read, use or display in a school any material for which an affirmative defense to prosecution may be asserted” under the state’s law prohibiting the promotion of obscenity, unless “such use, reading or display has been approved by the board of education of the school district in which such school is located.”

The original purpose of SB492 was to change state law to allow a person convicted of a misdemeanor driving under the influence charge to obtain a teaching license in Kansas, something which is currently prohibited in the state. Brownlee’s amendment introduced the language concerning the display of possibly obscene materials, and would hold school principles responsible for allowing teachers to use materials not approved by the school board.

In support of her measure, Brownlee has cited a 2005 controversy in the Blue Valley School District as evidence of need for the new law. That controversy involved a petition signed by approximately 500 residents in the Blue Valley district who demanded the removal of 14 “vulgar” novels from the district’s high school reading list. The offending novels reportedly included Toni Morrison’s “Beloved” and Cormac McCarthy’s “All the Pretty Horses.”

Brownlee has said that she recognizes that not everyone will agree on what constitutes “obscene” literature or viewing material, but asserted that Kansas residents have a right to their own standard.

“What’s acceptable in San Francisco may not be in Kansas,” Brownlee recently said during testimony before the House Education Committee. “Let the school board set the community standard.”

Jeffrey Douglas, chairman of the Free Speech Coalition (FSC), told XBIZ that Brownlee’s bill is “entirely unnecessary,” and added that it is very hard to imagine that any teacher would display material in a classroom that would it would be possible to successfully prosecute as legally obscene.

The state’s legal definition of obscenity is virtually identical to the Miller test, which defines the federal obscenity standard. Under Kansas law, material or performances are deemed to be obscene if “[t]he average person applying contemporary community standards would find that the material or performance, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; the average person applying contemporary community standards would find that the material or performance has patently offensive representations or descriptions of … ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including sexual intercourse or sodomy, or … masturbation, excretory functions, sadomasochistic abuse or lewd exhibition of the genitals; and taken as a whole, a reasonable person would find that the material or performance lacks serious literary, educational, artistic, political or scientific value.”

Douglas noted that however unlikely it is that any book or other teaching material used by teachers could successfully prosecuted as obscene, the language of Brownlee’s amendment can be interpreted to apply to any book that could be accused of being obscene, regardless of the prospects for a successful obscenity prosecution.

If the bill were to pass in its current form, the result would be a “chilling effect” that trickled down from the school board and into the classroom, Douglas said. Out of fear of upsetting parents in their district, school boards could be reticent to approve any remotely sexually explicit materials to be used in the classroom, thereby reducing the scope of both literature and sex education materials for teachers to use.

Douglas said he thinks the bill is most likely a political maneuver, and not an attempt to address an actual pressing need to curb the display of allegedly obscene materials in the state’s classrooms. He also predicted that the bill would never make it to Governor Kathleen Sebelius for her signature.

“These kinds of laws aren’t created to address a problem, but to create the impression that there is a problem in the first place,” Douglas said. “It is unfortunate but commonplace for legislators in one branch to suggest bills that they know will never pass the other [branch]. Doing this creates the appearance that they are doing something proactive, and leaves the responsibility for the measure being rejected on somebody else.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC Publishes Analysis of Federal Trade Commission Event Promoting AV

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published an analysis of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) event held this week that promoted age verification among other forms of speech regulation.

GirlsDoPorn Owner Michael Pratt Pleads Guilty to Sex Trafficking

Michael Pratt, former owner of the rogue website GirlsDoPorn, pleaded guilty in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California on Thursday to sex trafficking and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking charges, according to a report by City News Service.

Federal Judge Grants Partial Halt of Florida AV Law

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division, has granted a preliminary injunction against HB 3, the state's age verification law, as a lawsuit filed by two online trade associations challenging the law makes its way through the courts.

Aylo Releases Statement on Suspending Access to Pornhub in France

Technology and media company Aylo, which operates adult sites including Pornhub, YouPorn, and Redtube, has released a public statement regarding its decision to block access to its sites in France.

Pornhub Blocks Access in France in Response to SREN Law

Pornhub parent company Aylo has opted to block access to its sites in France rather than comply with age verification requirements under the country’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law.

Canadian Senator Revives Push for National AV Law

Sen. Julie Miville-Dechêne, whose previous multiple attempts to legislate national age verification requirements all failed, has introduced a new bill that would impose fines of up to $500,000 on adult sites that do not implement age verification for Canadian viewers.

FSC Submits Statement to House Committee in Support of FIRM Act

Free Speech Coalition has announced that it submitted a statement to the House Financial Services Committee in support of the Financial Integrity and Regulation Management (FIRM) Act.The announcement follows:

Trump Tariffs Remain in Effect Pending Appeal of Trade Court Ruling

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday stayed an injunction by the U.S. Court of International Trade, delaying the trade court’s order blocking the Trump administration’s sweeping tariffs, which have significantly impacted the pleasure industry.

EU Investigating 4 Adult Sites for 'Suspected Breaches' of DSA

The European Commission has initiated formal proceedings against Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX and XVideos for “suspected breaches” of the Digital Services Act (DSA), the Commission announced in a statement Monday.

Luxembourg Rejects Request to Enforce French AV Law

Government officials in Luxembourg have rebuffed a French government request to help enforce France’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law by taking action against webcam platform LiveJasmin, the Luxembourg Times is reporting.

Show More