Lylith LaVey Claims Mr. Marcus Shoot Led to Emotional Distress

LOS ANGELES — Mr. Marcus' attorney says that performer Lylith LaVey's emotional distress suit against the male porn star at center of last year's syphilis-infection outbreak is full of holes because she knew the risks involved in shoots.

LaVey filed suit in September alleging emotional distress stemming from a June 24 Bang Bros shoot involving herself and Mr. Marcus. The suit filed at Van Nuys Superior Court surfaced after MikeSouth.com posted a case summary of it yesterday.

In the Bang Bros video, LaVey could be seen giving fellatio to Mr. Marcus, whose penis clearly showed evidence of a possible STI.   

Mr. Marcus, in a previous interview with XBIZ, said the sores at the time looked more like a skin irritation. “It looked like a patch of rough skin, like maybe a reaction to some kind of lube that irritated me," he previously told XBIZ.

While the case is in its early discovery phases, the emotional distress case hinges on LaVey's claim that Mr. Marcus didn't inform the female performer that he had earlier contracted an STI, according to Mr. Marcus attorney Martin Cutler.

"In my 24 years of practicing law, I have never seen a more frivolous case against a defendant  than this one," Cutler told XBIZ. "There was an assumption of risk in the case of the shoot. She's a porn actress — she knew what she was getting into."

Los Angeles' adult film industry expressed sharp emotions over the syphilis outbreak last year that put livelihoods on pause during a performance moratorium.

At the epicenter of the outbreak was Mr. Marcus, who on Aug. 21 admitted he had performed in three sex scenes after doctoring his STI test to conceal that he had contracted syphilis. The revelation struck the adult film community as a betrayal and reaction was swift and merciless.

While Marcus drew the brunt of people’s outrage, many also suggested that industry testing lab Talent Testing Services and the Free Speech Coalition’s Adult Production Health & Safety Services mishandled the crisis due to “politics.”

LaVey did not respond to XBIZ calls over the suit. Her attorney, Adam Rose, could not be contacted.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

XBIZ LA Conference Website Goes Live, Registration Now Open

The event website for the XBIZ LA conference is now live, offering comprehensive information about the upcoming event, taking place Jan. 7-10 at the JW Marriott L.A. LIVE.

CrakRevenue Rolls Out 'Aff Companion' Real-Time Mobile Notification App

CrakRevenue has launched Aff Companion, a mobile app that sends affiliates real-time notifications about clicks, conversions, and revenue.

ERIKALUST Releases 'Close Up'

Spookie Shelbie and Delfine Dahlia star in the latest release from ERIKALUST, titled “Close Up.”

Lexi Lore Makes Her Vixen Debut

Lexi Lore has made her debut for Vixen Media Group's flagship imprint alongside Parker Ambrose in the studio's latest release.

Goddess Lilith Launches New Official Website Through PAYSITE

Goddess Lilith has rolled out her new official site, QueenGoddessLilith, through PAYSITE.

Penthouse Names Madiiitay as October's 'Pet of the Month'

Penthouse Magazine has named Seattle content creator and professional modeling newcomer Madiiitay as Pet of the Month for October.

Pineapple Support to Host 'Reclaiming Intimacy' Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group for performers with trauma-impacted intimacy issues.

Wendy Marvell, Shadow Dimitri Make Their Immoral Debuts

Wendy Marvell and newly crowned XMA Europe Male Performer of the Year Shadow Dimitri have made their debuts for Immoral Productions alongside Marvell's husband Matt Bird, Irish Bull, John Price, and studio honcho "Porno Dan" Leal.

Ofcom Cites Web Prime, Porntrex for Alleged AV Violations

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Tuesday notified two operators of adult websites of the agency’s provisional determination that the companies have failed to comply with provisions of the Online Safety Act.

Show More