opinion

Thought Police Claim More Victims

In this country, we put adults in a cage for making a movie about a sexual fantasy. Rob Black and Lizzy Borden (a/k/a Robert Zicari and Janet Romano) both received a year and a day in a federal penitentiary, for making movies with consenting performers for enjoyment by consenting adults.

While I have seen it many times, and have had to escort a client or two of my own to the courtroom for sentencing in obscenity cases, the concept never ceases to amaze me. How far is this from jailing citizens for political dissent? Not very far, in my view. The United States is looked to as the standard-bearer of freedom and liberty in the world — yet we do this to our own citizens.

Was the material produced by these folks disturbing? Sure... to most. Was it degrading to women? Not unless it caused someone to degrade women just by seeing it. The women in the films choose to perform, and were paid to play a role. They were not degraded. You'd still have to convince me that people act on what they see in a movie. That link has never been successfully established in the social research. Was it obscene? I don't know. What does that mean, anyway? A politically-motivated prosecutor obviously thought so, and decided to initiate the prosecution. A federal judge agreed to accept the defendants' guilty plea, so he must be ok with the concept. But does it matter if something is 'obscene' in current society? Does it matter enough to put people behind bars with the likes of Bernie Madolf and the Unibomber? I have yet to hear a rational policy argument for the continued viability of obscenity laws. Originally, the government claimed that these laws were necessary to prevent the inadvertent exposure to obscene material by the unwilling viewer, and to protect children. How does a random obscenity prosecution, here and there, protect the unwilling viewer? The Internet would need to be shut down to accomplish that goal. What about protecting children? Ok, how does putting a few people in jail every year, for obscenity violations, protect children from viewing this material? Obscenity laws make no reference to exposure to children, for a violation to occur. The arguments in favor of their constitutionality would be substantially more sound if that were the case. But in the Rob Black case, there was no allegation that children viewed the material, or that it was available to children. The material was made by adults for adults. The only adults who were forced to watch it were the judge and (if the case had gone to trial) the jury.

This material was no more 'obscene' than terabytes of media found on the web, with a click of the mouse. How does a citizen tell the difference between illegal obscenity, and constitutionally protected pornography? As many judges have admitted, they can't. While due process mandates that citizens be put on notice as to what activity is criminal, so they can conform their actions to the dictates of the law – obscenity laws are the obvious exception. There is no fair notice, when it comes to obscenity. The only time that a defendant knows whether he or she committed the crime is when the jury comes back and announces its verdict.

Rob Black and Lizzy Borden are freedom fighters. They pushed the envelope of free speech, and the government pushed back. While it would have been interesting to see if a jury actually convicted them for this material, they will spend a year of their life in a free country, behind bars for making a fantasy come to life on film. The judge could have recognized the absurdity of this law, and placed them on probation. He didn't.

I will think about Rob and Lizzy, along with all the other free citizens that this country confines to a cage, every time I go into a courtroom and push back against government censorship. It was not in vain, folks. Keep the faith.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

profile

WIA Profile: Lexi Morin

Lexi Morin’s journey into the adult industry began with a Craigslist ad and a leap of faith. In 2011, fresh-faced and ambitious, she was scrolling through job ads on Craigslist when she stumbled upon a listing for an assistant makeup artist.

Women In Adult ·
profile

Still Rocking: The Hun Celebrates 30 Years in the Game

In the ever-changing landscape of adult entertainment, The Hun’s Yellow Pages stands out for its endurance. As one of the internet’s original fixtures, literally nearly as old as the web itself, The Hun has functioned as a living archive for online adult content, quietly maintaining its relevance with an interface that feels more nostalgic than flashy.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

Digital Desires: AI's Emerging Role in Adult Entertainment

The adult industry has always been ahead of the curve when it comes to embracing new technology. From the early days of dial-up internet and grainy video clips to today’s polished social media platforms and streaming services, our industry has never been afraid to innovate. But now, artificial intelligence (AI) is shaking things up in ways that are exciting but also daunting.

Steve Lightspeed ·
opinion

More Than Money: Why Donating Time Matters for Nonprofits

The adult industry faces constant legal battles, societal stigma and workplace challenges. Fortunately, a number of nonprofit organizations work tirelessly to protect the rights and well-being of adult performers, producers and industry workers. When folks in the industry think about supporting these groups, donating money is naturally the first solution that comes to mind.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Consent Guardrails: How to Protect Your Content Platform

The adult industry takes a strong and definite stance against the creation or publication of nonconsensual materials. Adult industry creators, producers, processors, banks and hosts all share a vested interest in ensuring that the recording and publication of sexually explicit content is supported by informed consent.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
opinion

Payment Systems: Facilitator vs. Gateway Explained

Understanding and selecting the right payment platform can be confusing for anyone. Recently, Segpay launched its payment gateway. Since then, we’ve received numerous questions about the difference between a payment facilitator and a payment gateway. Most merchants want to know which type of platform best meets their business needs.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

Reinventing Intimacy: A Look at AI's Implications for Adult Platforms

The adult industry has long revolved around delivering pleasure and entertainment, but now it’s moving into new territory: intimacy, connection and emotional fulfillment. And AI companions are at the forefront of that shift.

Daniel Keating ·
profile

Nicole Vaunt on Turning Desire Into a Work of Art

It’s not every day you come across someone who can speak just as passionately about smutty novels and tabletop board games as they can about lighting, lens choices and shooting adult content in sub-zero temperatures. But Nicole Vaunt doesn’t fit easily into one box — and that’s just the way she likes it.

Jackie Backman ·
profile

WIA: Sara Edwards on Evolving Clip Culture and Creator Empowerment

Though she works behind the scenes, Sara Edwards has had a front-row seat to the evolution of adult content creation. Having been immersed in the sector since 1995, she has a unique perspective on the industry.

Jackie Backman ·
profile

Segpay Marks 20 Years of High-Risk Triumphs

Payment processors are behind-the-scenes players in the world of ecommerce, yet their role is critical. Ensuring secure, seamless transactions while navigating a rapidly changing regulatory landscape requires both technological expertise and business acumen.

Jackie Backman ·
Show More