educational

California Tax Law Update

In an effort to raise revenue, the California state government made a few legislation changes this year that will likely affect every entity doing business in California:

  • Suspending the NOL deduction and limiting the use of business credits to 50 percent of a taxpayer's tax liability for tax years 2008 and 2009, except for taxpayers with net business incomes of less than $500,000 in either year;
  • Limiting business tax credits and allowing corporate taxpayers to assign eligible credits to affiliated corporations that are members of the same combined reporting group;
  • Reinstating and making permanent the 12-month presumption period for application of the use tax to vehicles, vessels and aircraft purchased outside California and subsequently brought into the state; and
  • Requiring taxpayers to make estimated payment of the Limited Liability Company fee by June 15 of the current taxable year.

NOL Suspension
NOL deductions are disallowed for the 2008 and 2009 tax years, except for taxpayers with net business incomes of less than $500,000 in either year. For taxpayers with NOLs incurred before 2008, the 10-year period is tolled between 2008 and 2010.

NOLs incurred in prior years can generally be used to offset taxable income in future years (e.g., when a company becomes profitable). The ability to offset prior year losses against future income effectively reduces the future California tax liability of corporations with carry-forward NOLs. For corporations that rely on the NOL deduction, a suspension of the NOLs will have a significant cash flow impact — an unwelcome surprise to corporations that are not used to paying tax in California and likely pay no federal income tax.

Furthermore, the California tax law change allows for NOLs incurred on or after Jan. 1, 2008, to be carried forward up to 20 years, and NOLs incurred on or after Jan. 1, 2011, to be carried back up to two years. The carry-back provisions will be gradually phased in. Fifty percent of 2011 NOLs may be carried back to a taxable year, and 75 percent of 2012 NOLs may likewise be carried back. The full amount of NOLs attributable to a taxable year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2013, may be carried back to a taxable year.

To reduce California tax liabilities during the NOL suspension period, taxpayers should consider strategies to defer income such as with accounting method changes and qualifying for research and development credit, employee hiring credits, and the various enterprise zone credits.

However, these planning techniques to reduce a business's California tax liability are subject to new limitations. See the next section for more detail.

Business Tax Credits
For tax years 2008 and 2009, taxpayers may not use business tax credits (including the Research and Development credit, the Enterprise Zone credit, and the Low-Income Housing credit) to reduce their tax liability below 50 percent of their net tax, before application of any other credits. This limitation does not apply to taxpayers with net business incomes of less than $500,000 in either year.

Beginning July 1, 2008, corporate taxpayers may assign "eligible credits" to affiliated corporations that are members of the same combined reporting group. Assignees may apply such credits against their tax liability for taxable years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2010.

Increase in Corporate Underpayment Penalties
To further raise revenue, the legislative changes have also increased the corporate underpayment penalties. A penalty of 20 percent (of the amount of any corporate franchise tax underpayment in excess of $1 million) will be assessed in addition to the current 10 percent annual interest applied to these late payments.

This penalty applies to each taxable year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2003, which remains open under the statute of limitations. Once the penalty is assessed there are no protest rights. Arguably, taxpayers included in a combined report can avoid this penalty by filing separate returns if their individual liability is under $1 million.

There is no reasonable cause exception (unlike the substantial understatement penalty under California Revenue and Tax Code Section 19164). The only way to protect against the penalty will be to have predicted what the underpayments would be, filed amended returns, and have paid the tax by May 31 of this year.

Taxpayers may avoid this underpayment penalty by placing greater importance on seeking professional tax services to ensure properly filing and paying the appropriate amount of California corporate franchise tax.

Please contact us if you have any questions on how these California tax law changes will affect your business.

Montage Services Inc. provides international and domestic tax consulting and advisory services, primarily for corporations. To inquire about a particular tax issue or seek consulting services, contact Scott Wentz, managing director, at (415) 963-4016 or scott@montage-services.com.

Related:  

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

Why Cyber Insurance Is Crucial for Adult Businesses

From streaming services and interactive platforms to ecommerce and virtual reality experiences, the adult industry has long stood at the forefront of online innovation. However, the same technology-forward approach that has enabled adult businesses to deliver unique and personalized content to consumers worldwide also exposes them to myriad risks.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Best Practices for Payment Gateway Security

Securing digital payment transactions is critical for all businesses, but especially those in high-risk industries. Payment gateways are a core component of the digital payment ecosystem, and therefore must follow best practices to keep customer data safe.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Ready for New Visa Acquirer Changes?

Next spring, Visa will roll out the U.S. version of its new Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program (VAMP), which goes into effect April 1, 2025. This follows Visa Europe, which rolled out VAMP back in June. VAMP charts a new path for acquirers to manage fraud and chargeback ratios.

Cathy Beardsley ·
profile

WIA Profile: Siren Obscura

Siren Obscura grew up in Arizona, surrounded by rugged beauty and desert landscapes that she describes as having a quiet power to them. That environment strongly shaped her appreciation for contrasts and natural light, which plays a significant role in her work today.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

How to Thwart Holiday Fraudsters With Finesse

The holiday season is a prime time for shopping. Unfortunately, it’s also peak season for credit card fraud. With increased transactions both online and in-store, fraudsters have more opportunities to exploit vulnerabilities — and they are getting better at it every day.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

How to Halt Hackers as Fraud Attacks Rise

For hackers, it’s often a game of trial and error. Bad actors will perform enumeration and account testing, repeating the same test on a system to look for vulnerabilities — and if you are not equipped with the proper tools, your merchant account could be the next target.

Cathy Beardsley ·
profile

VerifyMy Seeks to Provide Frictionless Online Safety, Compliance Solutions

Before founding VerifyMy, Ryan Shaw was simply looking for an age verification solution for his previous business. The ones he found, however, were too expensive, too difficult to integrate with, or failed to take into account the needs of either the businesses implementing them or the end users who would be required to interact with them.

Alejandro Freixes ·
opinion

How Adult Website Operators Can Cash in on the 'Interchange' Class Action

The Payment Card Interchange Fee Settlement resulted from a landmark antitrust lawsuit involving Visa, Mastercard and several major banks. The case centered around the interchange fees charged to merchants for processing credit and debit card transactions. These fees are set by card networks and are paid by merchants to the banks that issue the cards.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

It's Time to Rock the Vote and Make Your Voice Heard

When I worked to defeat California’s Proposition 60 in 2016, our opposition campaign was outspent nearly 10 to 1. Nevertheless, our community came together and garnered enough support and awareness to defeat that harmful, misguided piece of proposed legislation — by more than a million votes.

Siouxsie Q ·
opinion

Staying Compliant to Avoid the Takedown Shakedown

Dealing with complaints is an everyday part of doing business — and a crucial one, since not dealing with them properly can haunt your business in multiple ways. Card brand regulations require every merchant doing business online to have in place a complaint process for reporting content that may be illegal or that violates the card brand rules.

Cathy Beardsley ·
Show More