educational

Dwindling Liberties v. The War On Terrorism

In light of the recent tragedy of September 11, 2001 and the war against the terrorism, that the United States and its allies have waged against Afghanistan and all the terrorist networks around the world, United States' Congress has been busy enacting new legislation to deal with the "new" threat to our country.

Many of the proposed legislation was faced with opposition by the civil rights groups such as the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) and other Washington leftist liberals. Among the many proposals, the one piece of legislation that passed through both Houses of Congress with virtually no opposition by any of the members of the Congress, was U.S.A. Patriot Act.

Strangely enough, this is one legislation that is strongly opposed by groups, on both ends of the political spectrum. ACLU, the voice for civil rights and liberties, on the left, and the N.R.A. (National Rifle Association) the advocate for gun rights and the Second Amendment, to the right, have both expressed their concern and discontent with the broad implications of the USA Patriot Act.

As a compromise and to curb the opposition to this legislation, Congress has put in place a four year limit on the USA Patriot Act. This means that unless Congress enacts an extension to this legislation, it will automatically expire and no longer be in effect.

The provisions that specially should concern all of us living in the United States, both as citizens and lawful immigrants, are ones that allow federal law enforcement to conduct secret searches, using warrants issued by the Foreign Intelligence Court. Foreign Intelligence Court, despite what its name may suggest, is not much of a court at all.

This "Court" is housed in the basement of the United States Justice Department, meets in secret, does not allow public access, uses secret evidence to issue warrants, and has never refused a request for a warrant by the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigations). This Court by its nature of operation, goes against every safe guard that our Federal Constitution has put in place to guarantee a fair and unbiased Judiciary.

Other controversial provisions, provide that the Federal law enforcement do not need to knock and announce their presence, when serving warrants. This means that every time a person walks into his house or apartment and sees his door knocked down and his belongings missing, he needs not to worry. It is possible that he has been a subject of a secret warrant by the FBI, and not a burglary.

As outrageous as the new broad powers granted to the Federal authorities maybe, most Americans are willing to go along with them to ensure national security and to restore safety of our country. What we need to consider however, is that once we have overcome the terrorist threats, all of the might and enormous powers granted to the Federal law enforcement is still going to be available to them and probably going to be directed towards other Federal agendas. ...you can be sure that they will find another "Evil" to pursue.

Once all the newly hired Federal Agents do not have their hands full with chasing Usama Bin Laden around the world and have brought down the terrorist networks, you can be sure that they will find another "Evil" to pursue. Traditionally both local and Federal Authorities have found easy targets in the adult entertainment industry. Once it is settled law that warrants can be issued based on secret evidence, in certain circumstances, we will be that much closer to having Federal Raids on film studios based on secret tips to the police, stopping publishers from putting out certain articles based on evidence that government is not inclined to disclose and whatever else the government deems to be appropriate.

So please, lets unite and be vigilant so we can win the war on terrorism as soon as it is humanly possible; and once we are done with that, lets demand to get all of our Constitutional Rights restored immediately. The only way to enjoy being an American is to enjoy Freedom, and lets not forget that!

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

Best Practices for Payment Gateway Security

Securing digital payment transactions is critical for all businesses, but especially those in high-risk industries. Payment gateways are a core component of the digital payment ecosystem, and therefore must follow best practices to keep customer data safe.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Ready for New Visa Acquirer Changes?

Next spring, Visa will roll out the U.S. version of its new Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program (VAMP), which goes into effect April 1, 2025. This follows Visa Europe, which rolled out VAMP back in June. VAMP charts a new path for acquirers to manage fraud and chargeback ratios.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

How to Halt Hackers as Fraud Attacks Rise

For hackers, it’s often a game of trial and error. Bad actors will perform enumeration and account testing, repeating the same test on a system to look for vulnerabilities — and if you are not equipped with the proper tools, your merchant account could be the next target.

Cathy Beardsley ·
profile

VerifyMy Seeks to Provide Frictionless Online Safety, Compliance Solutions

Before founding VerifyMy, Ryan Shaw was simply looking for an age verification solution for his previous business. The ones he found, however, were too expensive, too difficult to integrate with, or failed to take into account the needs of either the businesses implementing them or the end users who would be required to interact with them.

Alejandro Freixes ·
opinion

How Adult Website Operators Can Cash in on the 'Interchange' Class Action

The Payment Card Interchange Fee Settlement resulted from a landmark antitrust lawsuit involving Visa, Mastercard and several major banks. The case centered around the interchange fees charged to merchants for processing credit and debit card transactions. These fees are set by card networks and are paid by merchants to the banks that issue the cards.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

It's Time to Rock the Vote and Make Your Voice Heard

When I worked to defeat California’s Proposition 60 in 2016, our opposition campaign was outspent nearly 10 to 1. Nevertheless, our community came together and garnered enough support and awareness to defeat that harmful, misguided piece of proposed legislation — by more than a million votes.

Siouxsie Q ·
opinion

Staying Compliant to Avoid the Takedown Shakedown

Dealing with complaints is an everyday part of doing business — and a crucial one, since not dealing with them properly can haunt your business in multiple ways. Card brand regulations require every merchant doing business online to have in place a complaint process for reporting content that may be illegal or that violates the card brand rules.

Cathy Beardsley ·
profile

WIA Profile: Patricia Ucros

Born in Bogota, Colombia, Ucros graduated from college with a degree in education. She spent three years teaching third grade, which she enjoyed a lot, before heeding her father’s advice and moving to South Florida.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Creating Payment Redundancies to Maximize Payout Uptime

During the global CrowdStrike outage that took place toward the end of July, a flawed software update brought air travel and electronic commerce to a grinding halt worldwide. This dramatically underscores the importance of having a backup plan in place for critical infrastructure.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

The Need for Minimal Friction in Age Verification Technology

In the adult sector, robust age assurance, comprised of age verification and age estimation methods, is critical to ensuring legal compliance with ever-evolving regulations, safeguarding minors from inappropriate content and protecting the privacy of adults wishing to view adult content.

Gavin Worrall ·
Show More