opinion

Dissecting the EU Directive's Onslaught Against Free Speech

Dissecting the EU Directive's Onslaught Against Free Speech

Now that Article 11 and 13 have passed in the EU Parliament, alarmists are arguing that the internet as we know it is about to die. Lobbyists have tried in vain for years to bring about draconian copyright reform with SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act), PIPA (Protect IP Act) and ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement), but the internet successfully stopped them at every turn. However, the powers that be are nothing if not persistent, and they kept trying until they eventually pushed through problematic new laws that will undermine free speech, online creativity and alternative news media and may even make most internet memes impossible.

The European Parliament recently rubber-stamped copyright reform with 348 votes in favor and 274 against. Years of counter-campaigning have proven futile, and in the end, the EU seems to have gotten what it wanted: a new means of controlling and censoring the web and the free passage of information. As a consequence, it also now has a mechanism for scrubbing populist and nationalist movements from the internet. Corporate lobbyists in the mainstream media (film, television, music and the video game industry) are celebrating. Any content they own can henceforth be removed on their say-so even if its usage previously fell under “Fair Use.”

Even the staunchest pro-EU supporter is going to have a hard time justifying their love for the EU if it plans to play catch-up with China in terms of censorship.

The film, TV and music industries have been unhappy with the internet since day one, and they've oddly failed to clamp down on piracy. Under the new EU copyright directive, they'll be granted complete control over every image, video and song they own. Article 13 allows/demands the identification of any material uploaded to social networks, before instantly monetizing it or removing it regardless as to whether that material is non-commercial. Content ID matching is set to become the norm. Spreading funny or satirical memes that make use of copyrighted imagery will be impossible. Hence the term “Meme Ban.”

Mainstream media wants more of the pie at the expense of the little guy. Article 13 requires social networks to filter every bit of content uploaded and cross-reference it with commercial rights holders’ databases. Article 11, on the other hand, is referred to as the “Link Tax.” Small blogs or alternative/independent media commentators running websites that link to a news story from a major publication will (at least in theory) have to pay a fee. The inclusion of text snippets from major news outlets in a fair use capacity will require a licensing charge. For critics of this development, an attack on the hyperlink is an attack on the very internet itself. Even individual social media users posting links to articles on Facebook or Twitter won't be able to do that without agreeing to pay these link taxes. Now, social networks may or may not agree to these fees, but it has been suggested that they will choose to cease operations in the EU because the cost will become prohibitively expensive. Small social networks like BitChute, Gab and Minds will be facing the same fees as the big players.

The idea of a flawless “Upload Filter” (Article 13) itself seems impractical and utopian. After all, we're talking about highly sophisticated machine learning systems able to trawl through an infinitely large database of material while accurately detecting what was original content and what belonged to a movie or music studio. The dizzying complexity of implementing such systems would be phenomenal, to say nothing about the expenses. Some argue that politically speaking, the European Union is the main beneficiary of the copyright directive but for different reasons. The EU itself is under threat and to a certain degree, it no longer wishes for its citizens to be able to question its rulings, policies and actions freely. Are we really steering towards an anti-democratic, bureaucratic Superstate that wishes to answer to no one? European mainstream media is predominantly pro-EU. It's the Euroskeptic alternative media who fear censorship, and this is where so-called “hate speech” legislation usually comes into play. Information is incredibly difficult to police because too many people have the ability not only to access dissenting viewpoints but to spread inconvenient truths far and wide across the web. Information is power, and the EU knows it.

The hate speech argument is wearing thin. The EU faces legitimate criticism about controlling media narrative and restricting what its citizens can say or see online. In a dystopian vision of the near future, the copyright directive could allow the EU to censor the internet, but it will no longer be under the guise of combating “hate speech” or “fake news.” Five million Europeans, spearheaded by leading internet technology experts and academics protested with petitions. Even the staunchest pro-EU supporter is going to have a hard time justifying their love for the EU if it plans to play catch-up with China in terms of censorship. Deplatforming, demonetizing and shutting down free speech not approved of by Big Media and the political establishment must never be considered viable options.

A recent statement from YouTube said that the final legislation which passed was "an improvement" from when it was first announced, but that the platform is indeed "concerned" that Article 13 could have "unintended consequences that may harm Europe's creative and digital economy." Hope remains for those who oppose the directives in that each EU member country has two years to peruse the legislation, then tweak and improve it before its implementation in their own country. It isn't clear what that means for the UK though, given that Brexit confusion rages on.

Jonathan Corona has 15 years of experience in the electronic payments industry. As MobiusPay’s EVP, Corona is primarily responsible for day-to-day operations as well as reviewing and advising merchants on a multitude of compliance standards set forth by the card associations. MobiusPay specializes in merchant accounts in the U.S., E.U. and Asia. Follow them @MobiusPay on Twitter, FB and IG.

Related:  

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

The Search for Perfection in Your Payments Page

There has been a lot of talk about changes to cross sales and checkout pages. You have likely noticed that acquirers are now actively pushing back on allowing merchants to offer a negative option, upsell or any cross sales on payment pages.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

Unpacking the Payment Card Industry's Latest Data Security Standard

The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) is a set of requirements and guidelines that apply to all businesses that accept credit card payments, and is designed to ensure the security of those transactions.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Compliance With State Age Verification Laws

During the past year, website operators have faced a slew of new state age verification laws entailing a variety of inconsistent compliance obligations.

Lawrence Walters ·
opinion

Merchants in Spotlight With Visa's VIRP

By now, most merchants know about the Visa Integrity Risk Program (VIRP) rolled out in spring 2023. The program is designed to ensure that acquirers and their designated agents — payment facilitators, independent sales organizations and wallets — maintain proper controls and oversight to prevent illegal transactions from entering the Visa payment system.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

How to Know When Hosting Upgrades Are Really Needed

I was reminded about an annoyingly common experience that often frustrates website owners: upgrades. Sometimes, an upgrade of physical system resources like CPU, RAM or storage really is required to solve a problem or improve performance… but how do you know you’re not just being upsold?

Brad Mitchell ·
profile

WIA Profile: Natasha Inamorata

Natasha Inamorata was just a kid when she first picked up a disposable camera. She quickly became enamored with it and continued to shoot with whatever equipment she could afford. In her teens, she saved enough money to purchase a digital Canon ELPH, began taking portraits of her friends, shot an entire wedding on a point-and-shoot camera and edited the photos with Picnik.

Women in Adult ·
trends

Collab Nation: Top Creators Share Best Practices for Fruitful Co-Shoots

One of the fastest ways for creators to gain new subscribers and buyers, not to mention monetize their existing fan base, is to collaborate with other creators. The extra star power can multiply potential earnings, broaden brand reach and boost a creator’s reputation in the community.

Alejandro Freixes ·
opinion

Bridging Generational Divides in Payment Preferences

While Baby Boomers and Gen Xers tend to be most comfortable with the traditional payment methods to which they are accustomed, like cash and credit cards, the younger cohorts — Millennials and Gen Z — have veered sharply toward digital-first payment solutions.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Legal and Business Safety for Creators at Trade Shows

As I write this, I am preparing to attend XBIZ Miami, which reminds me of attending my first trade show 20 years ago. Since then, I have met thousands of people from all over the world who were doing business — or seeking to do business — in the adult industry.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Adding AI to Your Company's Tech Toolbox

Artificial intelligence is all the rage. Not only is AI all over the headlines, it is also top of mind for many company leadership teams, who find themselves asking, “How can this new tool help our company?”

Cathy Beardsley ·
Show More