opinion

The Scarlet Letter Returns With Stigmatizing AB 2389

The Scarlet Letter Returns With Stigmatizing AB 2389

In 1850, Nathaniel Hawthorne published one of the greatest literary creations in history: “The Scarlet Letter: A Romance.” The novel tells the story of Hester Prynne, who conceives a daughter through an affair and then struggles to create a new life of repentance and dignity. She is required to wear a scarlet “A” on her dress when she is in front of townspeople to shame her. If you haven’t had the opportunity to read this literary classic, then I encourage you to visit your nearest library or Amazon.com. As you read “The Scarlet Letter” story for the first time, you’ll be hard-pressed not to consider its similarities to what has been proposed in AB 2389.

In February 2020 and about 170 years after the release of Hawthorne’s novel, California Assembly Members Cristina Garcia and Lorena Gonzalez introduced Assembly Bill 2389 (“AB 2389”). Initially, AB 2389 required any person working “… as an entertainer at an adult entertainment business or as a performer in any adult entertainment video, including, but not limited to, internet web-camming sites …” to pay for and engage in training every three years, to be fingerprinted and obtain a valid business license. Almost immediately after its public release, AB 2389 was promptly attacked by virtually every member of the adult entertainment industry, including performers, writers, producers and lawyers. Mainstream media outlets also aggressively reported on the negative reception AB 2389 received.

This is an attack on freedom of speech and expression and thankfully, if the State of California erroneously decides to pass this disgraceful bill, first amendment attorneys will be lined up to take on this fight.

Shortly after the widespread backlash, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez quickly announced that she would pull her name from the legislation. Also, in light of the public backlash, Assembly Member Cristina Garcia amended AB 2389 to remove the requirements for fingerprinting and obtaining a work license. Regardless of the amendments, AB 2389 still requires any person seeking to work in the adult entertainment business, to obtain a “certificate of training completion issued by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement.” AB 2389 is nothing more than another attempt to force anyone in the State of California seeking to legally engage in the adult entertainment industry to have to be subjected to potential humiliation, embarrassment and unnecessary hurdles while scarifying that person’s first amendment rights. Why not just skip all the tip-toeing and propose a law that requires all adult entertainers to be forced to tattoo a scarlet “A” to their chests?

Since first reading AB 2389 I’d been scratching my head trying to figure out what Assemblywoman Garcia was thinking and so common sense told me that the place to start would be to research what Assemblywoman Garcia was thinking herself. It didn’t take me long to reach the conclusion that Assemblywoman Garcia has little to no understanding of the adult entertainment industry when she released a statement indicating: “My goal is that the training required by AB 2389 will result in a certification process similar to that of other industries. For example, the food service industry requires a food handlers training course, in which workers complete a training course and at the end take a quiz. Upon passing the quiz, they are certified food handlers in this state.” I really can’t think of a worse comparison for Assemblywoman Garcia to have made and I’m not remotely surprised that the former co-sponsor of AB 2389 is running for cover.

I’m going to take this opportunity to be blunt. I don’t really care that Assemblywoman Garcia amended the bill to remove the fingerprinting and licensing requirements. The very fact that anyone would ever think that requiring an adult entertainer to be fingerprinted and licensed prior to working in the adult entertainment industry tells you exactly what Assemblywoman Garcia’s intentions are. One can only conclude that Assemblywoman Garcia wanted to be able to identify, track and regulate adult entertainers. AB 2389’s intent is clear; it is yet another hurdle for a person to clear before they knowingly and willfully work in the adult entertainment industry. This is an attack on freedom of speech and expression and thankfully, if the State of California erroneously decides to pass this disgraceful bill, first amendment attorneys will be lined up to take on this fight.

California residents and adult entertainers shouldn’t be surprised at the State of California once again targeting the adult entertainment industry — 2012 brought Los Angeles’ mandatory testing statute (Measure B) and of course 2016 brought the failed Proposition 60. In terms of long-term planning, my office continues to advise adult entertainers to be prepared to fight for the ability to engage in your chosen trade and it truly is a shame that politicians seemingly want to make adult entertainers feel as unwelcome as possible.

It’s very important to note that at this time, AB 2389 is nothing more than a proposed bill and there is plenty to do by every individual potentially affected by this horrendous proposed law. Comment publicly, work with the various adult industry associations working against AB 2389 and submit letters objecting to the bill to Assemblywoman Garcia and your local assemblyperson.

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) and the Adult Industry Laborers & Artists Association (AILAA) are doing everything they can to try to stop AB 2389, but they continue to need your support. If you haven’t done so already, I encourage you to become a member of both organizations and follow their suggestions for how and what you can do to help stop AB 2389.

This article does not constitute legal advice and is provided for your information only and should not be relied upon in lieu of consultation with legal advisors in your own jurisdiction. It may not be current as the laws in this area change frequently. Transmission of the information contained in this article is not intended to create, and the receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver.

Corey D. Silverstein is the managing and founding member of Silverstein Legal. His practice focuses on representing all areas of the adult industry and his clientele includes hosting companies, affiliate programs, content producers, processors, designers, developers, operators and more. He is licensed in numerous jurisdictions including Michigan, Arizona, the District of Colombia, Georgia and New York. Contact him at MyAdultAttorney.com, corey@myadultattorney.com and (248) 290-0655.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

profile

WIA Profile: Reba Rocket

As chief operating officer and chief marketing officer of Takedown Piracy, long at the forefront of intellectual property protection in adult entertainment, Rocket is dedicated to safeguarding the livelihoods of content creators and producers while fostering a more ethical and sustainable industry.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Protecting Content Ownership Rights When Using AI

In today’s digital age, content producers have more tools at their disposal than ever before. Among these tools, artificial intelligence (AI) content generation has emerged as a game changer, enabling creators to produce high-quality content quickly and efficiently.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

How Payment Orchestration Can Help Your Business

An emerging payment solution is making waves in the merchant world: the payment orchestration platform (POP). It’s quickly gaining traction as a powerful tool for managing online payments — but questions abound.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

Fine-Tuning Refund and Cancellation Policies

For adult websites, managing refunds and cancellations isn’t just about customer service. It’s a crucial factor in maintaining compliance with the regulations of payment processors and payment networks such as Visa and Mastercard.

Jonathan Corona ·
profile

WIA Profile: Laurel Bencomo

Born in Cambridge, England but raised in Spain, Laurel Bencomo initially chose to study business at the University of Barcelona simply because it felt familiar — both of her parents are entrepreneurs. She went on to earn a master’s degree in sales and marketing management at the EADA Business School, while working in events for a group of restaurants in Barcelona.

Women In Adult ·
profile

Gregory Dorcel on Building Upon His Brand's Signature Legacy

“Whether reflected in the storyline or the cast or even the locations, the entertainment we deliver is based on fantasy,” he elaborates. “Our business is not, and never has been, reality. People who are buying our content aren’t expecting reality, or direct contact with stars like you can have with OnlyFans,” he says.

Jeff Dana ·
opinion

How to Turn Card Brand Compliance Into Effective Marketing

In the adult sector, compliance is often treated as a gauntlet of mandatory checkboxes. While it’s true that those boxes need to be ticked and regulations must be followed, sites that view compliance strictly as a chore risk missing out on a bigger opportunity.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

A Look at the Latest AI Tools for Online Safety

One of the defining challenges for adult businesses is helping to combat the proliferation of illegal or nonconsensual content, as well as preventing minors from accessing inappropriate or harmful material — all the more so because companies or sites unable or unwilling to do so may expose themselves to significant penalties and put their users at risk.

Gavin Worrall ·
opinion

Know When to Drop Domains You Don't Need

Do you own too many domains? If so, you’re not alone. Like other things we accumulate, every registered domain means something to us. Sometimes a domain represents a dream project we have always wanted to do but have never quite gotten around to.

Juicy Jay ·
opinion

Understanding 'Indemnification' in Business Contracts

Clients frequently tell me that they didn’t understand — or sometimes, even read — certain portions of a contract because those sections appeared to be just “standard legalese.” They are referring, of course, to the specialized language used in legal documents, including contracts.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
Show More