opinion

Section 230 Isn’t a Blank Check to Shut Down Speech

Section 230 Isn’t a Blank Check to Shut Down Speech

Political censorship on social media sites should raise eyebrows of anyone working in adult. We, as an industry, should not support censorship in any way, as censoring some speech (whether we agree with it or not) will likely lead to continuing and worsened censorship of adult industry speech and expression. Instead, supporting education on fact-checking, first amendment rights and independent thought would lead to a better outcome for all.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was written to allow free dissemination of ideas. It relinquishes the liability of website operators of “interactive computer service[s],” such as social media sites, for actions of third-party users on the sites. Section 230 says, in summary, that such a website operator is not to be treated as the publisher or speaker of information shared on the service by a third-party user. Since the website operator is not treated as the publisher or speaker, it is not responsible for certain liabilities caused by third party users.

If it is acceptable for a social media website to remove certain [e.g., political] content because of the nature of the content, then it reinforces their position that they should have the right to remove adult content as well.

Right now, we’re seeing members of government attack that law from both sides of the political aisle. Republicans are alleging that some social media sites are acting as publishers and editorializing, essentially saying that the sites are not the neutral party which the law was meant to protect. Democrats are alleging that misinformation and fake news is allowed to be spread on social media sites without recourse.

Let us take a look at this from each side.

Looking at the issue from the perspective of removing content, on its face, sounds like a reasonable action on the part of website operators to block or remove content they deem false. When you dig deeper though, it is actually a form of censorship not much different from the censorship of sexual expression that the adult industry fights every day.

When website operators remove what they believe to be fake news, users never get to review the material. They never get to make an opinion for themselves on the truth or falsity of the content. Instead, they are sheltered from the viewpoint of the article altogether.

Doesn’t this sound familiar? Facebook and similar companies have been removing adult content for years. Although FOSTA accelerated the pace of this, it is not completely at fault. The censorship existed even prior to passage of FOSTA, but FOSTA made things even worse in causing social media sites to fear new legal liability under the law.

I believe that censorship should not be tolerated by the public, and especially by our industry. It is a slippery slope. If it is acceptable for a social media website to remove certain [e.g., political] content because of the nature of the content, then it reinforces their position that they should have the right to remove adult content as well.

I am not proposing that fake news is a positive thing, by any stretch of the imagination. But I am saying that to combat it, rather than invest in censorship, investment should be made into teaching people how to research and review articles and information to make their own conclusions on the truth or falsity of a particular story.

Now, let’s turn our focus to the side of the issue where problematic fake news can spread virally if left unchecked. If people are able to discern false content because they are educated on how to detect it, then they will be much less likely to share it. And, the outcome is likely that fake news will not spread very far, if at all.

Education on fact-checking, first amendment rights and independent thought will, accordingly, help prevent imposed censorship. While weakening Section 230 as a result of political issues is dangerous, unmitigated censorship of today's "public square" by unelected and faceless Big Tech employees needs to be addressed meaningfully. Fight for the continued existence of Section 230, but also against censorship, regardless of your political views.

Disclaimer: The content of this article constitutes general information, and is not legal advice. If you would like legal advice from Maxine Lynn, an attorney-client relationship must be formed by signing a letter of engagement with her law firm. To inquire, visit Sextech.Lawyer.

Maxine Lynn is an intellectual property (IP) attorney with the law firm of Keohane & D’Alessandro, PLLC. She focuses her practice on prosecution of patents for sex technology, trademarks for adult business brands and copyrights for porn and other creative materials. Through her company, Unzipped Media, Inc., she publishes the Unzipped: Sex, Tech & the Law blog and the Sex Tech Patent IndeXXX bulletin at SexTechLaw.com.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

profile

WIA Profile: Reba Rocket

As chief operating officer and chief marketing officer of Takedown Piracy, long at the forefront of intellectual property protection in adult entertainment, Rocket is dedicated to safeguarding the livelihoods of content creators and producers while fostering a more ethical and sustainable industry.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Protecting Content Ownership Rights When Using AI

In today’s digital age, content producers have more tools at their disposal than ever before. Among these tools, artificial intelligence (AI) content generation has emerged as a game changer, enabling creators to produce high-quality content quickly and efficiently.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

How Payment Orchestration Can Help Your Business

An emerging payment solution is making waves in the merchant world: the payment orchestration platform (POP). It’s quickly gaining traction as a powerful tool for managing online payments — but questions abound.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

Fine-Tuning Refund and Cancellation Policies

For adult websites, managing refunds and cancellations isn’t just about customer service. It’s a crucial factor in maintaining compliance with the regulations of payment processors and payment networks such as Visa and Mastercard.

Jonathan Corona ·
profile

WIA Profile: Laurel Bencomo

Born in Cambridge, England but raised in Spain, Laurel Bencomo initially chose to study business at the University of Barcelona simply because it felt familiar — both of her parents are entrepreneurs. She went on to earn a master’s degree in sales and marketing management at the EADA Business School, while working in events for a group of restaurants in Barcelona.

Women In Adult ·
profile

Gregory Dorcel on Building Upon His Brand's Signature Legacy

“Whether reflected in the storyline or the cast or even the locations, the entertainment we deliver is based on fantasy,” he elaborates. “Our business is not, and never has been, reality. People who are buying our content aren’t expecting reality, or direct contact with stars like you can have with OnlyFans,” he says.

Jeff Dana ·
opinion

How to Turn Card Brand Compliance Into Effective Marketing

In the adult sector, compliance is often treated as a gauntlet of mandatory checkboxes. While it’s true that those boxes need to be ticked and regulations must be followed, sites that view compliance strictly as a chore risk missing out on a bigger opportunity.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

A Look at the Latest AI Tools for Online Safety

One of the defining challenges for adult businesses is helping to combat the proliferation of illegal or nonconsensual content, as well as preventing minors from accessing inappropriate or harmful material — all the more so because companies or sites unable or unwilling to do so may expose themselves to significant penalties and put their users at risk.

Gavin Worrall ·
opinion

Know When to Drop Domains You Don't Need

Do you own too many domains? If so, you’re not alone. Like other things we accumulate, every registered domain means something to us. Sometimes a domain represents a dream project we have always wanted to do but have never quite gotten around to.

Juicy Jay ·
opinion

Understanding 'Indemnification' in Business Contracts

Clients frequently tell me that they didn’t understand — or sometimes, even read — certain portions of a contract because those sections appeared to be just “standard legalese.” They are referring, of course, to the specialized language used in legal documents, including contracts.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
Show More