Lamebook, in Preemptive Move, Says It Isn't Infringing

AUSTIN, Texas — This legal maneuver isn't so lame, after all.

Lamebook.com, fearing it might get sued by Facebook.com, has fired off a preemptive bullet, seeking a judgment declaring it isn't infringing, diluting or violating the rights of Facebook.

Facebook in recent months has been aggressive in its defense of its trademark by going against websites starting with the word “face” or ending in “book.”

The mainstream social network recently filed suit against the Bergen, Norway-based operator of adult social network Faceporn.com, claiming the site siphons away its traffic and dilutes the brand. It also sued Teachbook.com.

In the latest legal squirmish, Lamebook operators declare the site serves as a "humorous parody of Facebook and the role it plays in society," but that the social network's heavy-handed legal tactics are causing uncertainty to its business.

The case got legs in March when Lamebook's two founders, graphic designers Jonathan Standefer and Matthew Genitempo of Austin, Texas, were contacted by Facebook counsel. They claimed in correspondence that Lamebook infringes and dilutes Facebook's mark.

Lamebook counsel later responded by stating that it is a "clear parody" of the Facebook mark, according to the suit filed at U.S. District Court in Austin, Texas.

"As such it does not infringe or dilute the Facebook mark and is a protected form of expression under the 1st Amendment," Lamebook attorneys said.

Nevertheless, Facebook served a cease-and-desist letter to Lamebook, which promptly replied with a lawsuit complaining Facebook has "created a reasonable apprehension of litigation and have placed a cloud over Lamebook's ability to make use of the Lamebook mark."

Lamebook, on its site, has asked for surfers to help out in its legal journey by donating to a fund.

"They’ve decided to pick on the little guys: small business owners who seem to be no match for a multibillion-dollar behemoth," Lamebook said on its site. "But this is one website that’s not going down without a fight.

"With our 1st Amendment rights under fire, we’ve made a daring legal move that we believe will help us defend ourselves under the law and keep this site up, allowing us to keep bringing you, your friends, your parents, and your creepy uncle the insanity that’s had us in stitches since we started."

Lamebook is seeking a declaratory judgment, any other relief and attorneys fees.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Judge Dismisses Last NCOSE-Backed Suit Over Kansas AV Law

A federal judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit alleging that adult site SuperPorn violated Kansas’ age verification law, citing lack of jurisdiction after similarly dismissing two related cases earlier this year.

ASACP Rolls Out 'Restricted to Adults' Labeling Tool Updates

The Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) has updated its Restricted to Adults (RTA) labeling system.

Federal AV Proposal Scores Minor Win in House but Remains in Doubt

A newly announced bipartisan agreement in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce may soon bring a proposed federal age verification law before the full House, but the measure continues to face an uphill battle.

Arizona Governor Vetoes 'Protect Act' With New Consent Provisions

Arizona Governor Kate Hobbs on Friday vetoed HB 2133, the “Protect Act,” which would have imposed new requirements for adult content uploaded online.

Brazil Begins Monitoring 18 Adult Sites for AV Compliance

Brazil’s National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) is now monitoring 18 high-traffic adult websites for compliance with the country’s Digital Statute for Children and Adolescents (Digital ECA), which requires such sites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Ofcom Fines First Time Videos $100,000 for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Thursday imposed a fine of 80,000 pounds (more than $100,000) against First Time Videos, which operates FTVGirls.com and FTVMilfs.com, for failing to implement age checks required for compliance with the Online Safety Act.

Curves Ahead: How BBW Creators are Turning Differentiation Into Competitive Advantage

For centuries, curves have been celebrated as a symbol of beauty, sensuality and power. From the soft opulence of Rubens paintings to the glamorous silhouettes of pinup icons, fuller figures have long occupied a place in art, fashion and fantasy.

Woodhull Freedom Foundation to Host Virtual 'Pride' Edition of 'Fact Checked' Series

Woodhull Freedom Foundation is hosting a Pride Month virtual edition of its series “Fact Checked by Woodhull.”

'InMelanin' Relaunches Through PAYSITE

InMelanin.com has officially relaunched through PAYSITE.

Pearl Industry Network Partners With Takedown Piracy

Industry trade group Pearl Industry Network (PiN) has officially partnered with Takedown Piracy.

Show More